so unless your dog is a fighting machine and wins you sum feds in battle (which is illegal), then all that game talk is BS. there are dogs that are more loyal (indefinately), there are dogs that are more protective, more agile, faster, stronger, smarter, easier to keep, etc.... my point is you can love the pit all you want, but to say sum shit like "no other breeds can hold a candle to the pitbull" is nothing but an opinion, and not a well though out one at that-FatalNyghtmare
Bacc in the day true fanciers of the breed never set up matches for profit, but to determine which dogs were (or were not) worthy enough to be bred. Nowadays this isn't the case, and people who fight their dogs don't give a shit bout them. I was talking "gameness" strictly on a historical level, the search for gameness in these dogs is what got us the breed we have today. Any modern day dogs that have pedigrees tracing bacc to Wallace, Boudreaux, Colby, Heinzl, Bullyson, etc, these were all game tested in the beginning