What would the world be like if America JUST STAYED HOME?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 12, 2002
3,583
101
0
GoProGraphics.com
#22
Im just making an observation. I think al ot of you are into that doomsday shit. You all jump to fight for invisible causes. WHERES THE PROOF????

If we stayed home, we would have lost WW2 prolly. We would be better off now if we never got involved in most areas of the world. ONLY BECAUSE we make promises and then leave without fullfilling them. IRAQ will be a nother disaster we turn our backs on.
 
Nov 8, 2002
1,693
31
48
47
#23
I'm not just talking about War. I'm talking about Dropping Food meds, Help...
everything else. You think China would be helping Africa with aids or India would be helping Serbia?
 
Apr 25, 2002
508
0
0
39
wind.prohosting.com
#24
What a lot of people fail to relize is we are not "going to war" with iraq. All we are doing is stopping a mad man and libirating a people of a nation. We will hold an election after sadamm is out of power. The people of iraq will actually be able to vote for someone bisides prepunched ballets with 1 person on it lol. We can all agree Sadamm needs to get out. and if u dont........im sorry but you are a fuccin moron. If you think diffrent i compel you to live in iraq for a year come bacc and tell me everything is great and u could live there for the rest of your life. What kind of leader orders the gassing of 2000 of his own people? not a very good one.
 
May 8, 2002
549
0
0
40
#25
What a lot of people fail to relize is we are not "going to war" with iraq. All we are doing is stopping a mad man and libirating a people of a nation
So killing people is liberating them. All going to war is going to do is make more terrorists. Were gonna kill these peoples familys and they WONT BE HAPPY ABOUT IT.

We will hold an election after sadamm is out of power.
No we wont, we will put someone in charge there. Who will most likely turn on us.
 
Apr 25, 2002
508
0
0
39
wind.prohosting.com
#26
drankedout said:


So killing people is liberating them. All going to war is going to do is make more terrorists. Were gonna kill these peoples familys and they WONT BE HAPPY ABOUT IT.



No we wont, we will put someone in charge there. Who will most likely turn on us.

first off. you have no idea what u are talking about. we dont go into towns and kill women and children for no reason. terroists do that. However we have rules of conduct called rules of engagement. If u violate them the punishment is death. And yes we will hold an election or find someone who the people want in there. Just as we did n afganistan after overthrownign the taliban. The people told US who to put in charge. After interviewing him we found he was a worthy canidate. Most of our training now is geared towards how to capture surredering enmies rather then to kill them.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#28
KleanKut said:

first off. you have no idea what u are talking about. we dont go into towns and kill women and children for no reason. terroists do that. However we have rules of conduct called rules of engagement. If u violate them the punishment is death.
the US bombed aghan, and killed 3,000 innocent civillians


what happen to the rules of conduct there?

was that not terrorism?
 
Nov 27, 2006
33
0
0
39
#29
if america stayed at home yugoslavia would still be a country, kosovo wouldnt be overrun with albanians, so der would be no argument about its independence, and a shit load of innocent ppl would be alive
 
Nov 27, 2006
33
0
0
39
#30
nefar559 said:
the US bombed aghan, and killed 3,000 innocent civillians


what happen to the rules of conduct there?

was that not terrorism?
good point
u guys dont go into towns and kill woman and children haha u fuckers stay in da air and bomb hospitals and schools, or just go and rape woman, why dont u guys just go and finish dat war in iraq already its been a couple years
 
Nov 18, 2004
407
0
0
#35
International Policy should be determined by Hemisphere. The American government would do well to focus more on domestic issues. If every American was afforded the basic humanistic rights of 'shelter & purpose' it would be able to effectively adopt a model to be mirrored by otherwise inept governments.
 
May 14, 2002
6,278
6,950
0
42
#37
If America stayed home, America would be flat broke by now and

They invade countries, kick a lot of mess, robb it blind and leave it in rubbles or rebuild it to their own image and making $$$ by sending their companies (macdonalds etc) after.