what do you think about Arnold taking away licenses?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
4,692
2,577
113
44
Houston
#21
Re: DAMN

D-Locc60 said:
WTF??
YOUR COMMENTS MAKE NO DAMN SENSE.

You are implying that the children of parents with no license, do not want to learn and are not serious about their education.

WHERE THE FUCC DO YOU GET THAT IDEA FROM?


really...your comment is just str8 STUPID.


i could go on.....but it wouldn't do any good.

Actually, it does. The child may be serious about their education, but that was a bad decision on the parent's part. Depriving your kids of their education to obtain what you want is not the right way to go. Obviously, in my opinion, the parents don't value their child's education too much.

And by the way, I work in school districts in the areas, so I do know.






**shakes head**
Actually, it does. The child may be serious about their education, but that was a bad decision on the parent's part. Depriving your kids of their education to obtain what you want is not the right way to go. Obviously, in my opinion, the parents don't value their child's education too much.

And by the way, I work in school districts in the areas, so I do know.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#22
mExIcaNox4 said:
all gotta say is who is gonna take your orders at all the fast food joints, whose gonna serve you tacos, who i s gonna get rid of the leaves on ground during fall time , who is gonna pick our fruit in the central valley for us to eat, i can go on. american is built on immagrants legal or illegal.......
any1 who wants the job wether it be american citizens or Legal immigrants.

mExIcaNox4 said:
i say if a person came here to obey the law n purse the american dream whatever that is....then he has a right to be here...
No NON-AMERICAN has the right to be here unless our government OK's it.

they can have the best of intentions but if they break the law they should be deported immediatley.

it isnt fair to all the other immigrants that have been waiting for months and some even years that are trying to come here legally.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,602
23
38
SF
#23
Re: Re: DAMN

AdolfOliverBush said:
The child may be serious about their education, but that was a bad decision on the parent's part. Depriving your kids of their education to obtain what you want is not the right way to go. Obviously, in my opinion, the parents don't value their child's education too much.

And by the way, I work in school districts in the areas, so I do know.
I agree with you that it wasnt the best way to go about it. they should still have tried to get their kids to school somehow. i know a lot of teachers who called parents at home telling them not to pull their kids out of school. but i dont agree that it means that they don;t value their child's education. that's a pretty broad generalization bordering on stereotype.
it doesnt justify you saying this: "A lot of teachers said that it was the best day they have had all year because all of the students that actually want to learn and are serious about their education attended school today." just because thier parents made a certain decision does not mean that the students themselves are not serious about their education. i work with education too, and i know that a lot of those kids who were missing that day try really hard to do well in school. unless you yourself came here as an immigrant knowing very little english you have no idea how hard it is for some of them to do well.
 
Apr 26, 2002
3,707
17
38
117
Bacc In Texas
#24
Actually, it does. The child may be serious about their education, but that was a bad decision on the parent's part.
WTF?? WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
WHAT DECISION ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?

MANN, I DON'T WHAT CONVO YOU ARE IN, BUT IT DOESN'T APPEAR THAT YOU ARE IN THIS ONE.

Depriving your kids of their education to obtain what you want is not the right way to go. Obviously, in my opinion, the parents don't value their child's education too much.
AGAIN...WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
THE PARENTS ARE NOT DEPRIVING THEIR KIDS OF AN EDUCATION.
HOW?
CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT?



I FEEL LIKE I'M TALKING ABOUT CARS AND YOUR TALKING ABOUT PENS...
TOO DIFFERENT THINGS.
 
Sep 13, 2002
1,983
0
0
41
#25
they are because if they didnt come here illegally there wouldnt be this fucking proble,. stay in ya own country and wait till we let you in.


fuck i got family in sweden that wants to come here. they been waiting forever. its pure bull shit. make shit fair dont fuck over certain people just cause they made there country run right.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,602
23
38
SF
#26
D-Locc60 said:
WTF?? WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
WHAT DECISION ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
LOL D-Locc. I'm talking about the decision they made to boycott public institutions by keeping their kids home from school as a strategy for protesting Arnold's decision to revoke their licenses. lol, so yeah we're on the same topic (sort of.. I go off on tangents sometimes)

and by the way I agree with you mExIcaNox4, not very many people would be willing to take some of the jobs that immigrants (especially illegals) do. especially at the pay that they receive.
Mcleanhatch, you're pretty idealistic to think that "any1 who wants the job" would fill those positions. that may be true, but how many people actually WANT those jobs??? I implore you to conduct a survey and share your results with the rest of us..
 
Sep 13, 2002
1,983
0
0
41
#27
krishna the funny thing is. there has always been those jobs. these arnt jobs that just magicaly apeared when people ran across the border.


so there are people that will fill them. shit i see white people working at mc donalds everyday. and what you think they make bank?
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,602
23
38
SF
#28
^^ @proppa
you're right, i see white people working at McDonald's too. but i dont ever see white people picking strawberries on the fields at the the side of the highway 10 hours a day 6 days a week (minimum)

and jobs like those may have always existed, but not to the extent that they do today. and even before "people ran across the border" (as you put it), the lowliest of jobs were filled by lower class people. and the lower classes have historically been composed of immigrants (both legal and illegal). since you are so pro-American, you should be more aware of your country's history.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#29
D-Locc60 said:
AGAIN...WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
THE PARENTS ARE NOT DEPRIVING THEIR KIDS OF AN EDUCATION.
HOW?
he is talking about parents that hold their kids ourt of school to take a political stand.

as it is these schools are not doing well in america, many kids are failing and for parents to hold them out of class for political reasons doesnt make sense.

if the parents got the nerve and want to protest by missing work, hey that is there decision (but then they also shouldnt cry in they come back to find that their job has been replaced by another) and they can do it.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,602
23
38
SF
#30
^^ just to clear things up, the "boycott" was only for one day, so most people who participated werent in any danger of losing their jobs (at least in my city. I dont know what the situation was like elsewhere in the state)
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#31
krishna said:
Mcleanhatch, you're pretty idealistic to think that "any1 who wants the job" would fill those positions. that may be true, but how many people actually WANT those jobs??? I implore you to conduct a survey and share your results with the rest of us..
it has happened throughout the history of this country. the italians did it, the irish did it, then the eastern europeans did it.

now the immigrants from latin american countries are doing it.

krishna said:
Mcleanhatch, you're pretty idealistic to think that "any1 who wants the job" would fill those positions. that may be true, but how many people actually WANT those jobs??? I implore you to conduct a survey and share your results with the rest of us..
there are many people who would be willing to do these jobs if it werent for such programs that at times reward people for doing nothing. force a person to fend for themselves and i guarantee you those jobs will get filled.

does any1 here know about the program in SF. i have only heard about it briefly, but from what i have heard anyperson who doesnt have a job or is homeless can go in and sign up for some sort of AID where the City cuts them out $400 checks monthly. i mean with a program like that why would any1 want to go to work.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#32
Mcleanhatch said:

does any1 here know about the program in SF. i have only heard about it briefly, but from what i have heard anyperson who doesnt have a job or is homeless can go in and sign up for some sort of AID where the City cuts them out $400 checks monthly. i mean with a program like that why would any1 want to go to work.

oh shit, just what everybody wanted to be a .... bum


:dead:
 
Sep 13, 2002
1,983
0
0
41
#35
yea nefar thems are you people. real speak.

you think everyone should get paid the same no matter how lazy they are. those are you people. they make money while looking dirty smelling and taking up nice streets to sleep on.
 
May 1, 2002
2,930
567
0
41
#36
Then the us government needs to develop a a better system then the one we got now...cuz that shit sucks

like when people over stay their visa permit....the gov does not do anything....the only reason some change occured was because of 9-11

ok how about those american citizens who are homeless...they could easily go to your local market or whatever job that does not require a education...why don't they cuz there layzie fuks who are lucky that they don't live a 3rd world country
 
Apr 26, 2002
3,707
17
38
117
Bacc In Texas
#37
krishna-you str8 mann, my comments are directed at AdolfOliverBush. I know what you talking about.


LOL D-Locc. I'm talking about the decision they made to boycott public institutions by keeping their kids home from school as a strategy for protesting Arnold's decision to revoke their licenses. lol, so yeah we're on the same topic
yea,....I agree.




he is talking about parents that hold their kids ourt of school to take a political stand.

as it is these schools are not doing well in america, many kids are failing and for parents to hold them out of class for political reasons doesnt make sense.

if the parents got the nerve and want to protest by missing work, hey that is there decision (but then they also shouldnt cry in they come back to find that their job has been replaced by another) and they can do it.
Again, i agree.
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,692
2,577
113
44
Houston
#38
I am also talking about the older students who will look for any excuse to get out of school, and a lot of them used this boycott as one. I remember back in 8th grade (1994-95) when California was voting on Prop. 187 (I think that is the Prop). That was an unfair Prop. A lot of students at my school protested it and walked out of class. But there were also a lot who had no idea what the Prop was about and just left to get out of class. This is kind of where I am going with "The teachers had one of their best days".
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,602
23
38
SF
#39
^^ yea I know there are a lot of kids like that. they'll use any excuse to miss school. but i dont think that has anything to do with them being immigrants or not, thats just the way lots of teenagers are