What are your feelings on the war with Iraq?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#21
krishna said:
man I think war is bullshit.

the ones who are going to suffer the most are the ones that have nothing to do with it- Iraqi children/civilians
you mean as opposed to the thousands of children/civilians that could end up like the thousands that already ended up parentless because of the 9-11 attacks if future attacks were to occur
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#23
WiCkEd said:
its all bush trying to save his ass,trying to boost up the economy...if they really cared about terrorizm then they would bomb the real people funding them like iran and saudi arabia,instead they pick on poor ass broke saddam hussien who cant even defend himself..wag the dog..either way it wont work cause bush is gonna get voted out on the next election..
iran and saudi arabia is the closest thing to a democratic govt.

saudi arabia is always helping us.

just because the people of iraq are broke doesnt mean saddamn is
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#24
EDJ said:
MAN,
MINORITIES ARE AT THE BOTTOM AND WE IS THE ONES THAT ARE gONNA SUFFER MORE. NATIONAL SECURITY MY ASS.
thats nothing new, minorities have always been at the bottom.

in the 1700's it was the irish and other western europeans, in the 1800's it was the italians and other eastern europeans, in the 1900's it was blacks, hispanics, middleeasterners and slavics.

and what does that have to do with national security anyway
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#25
krishna said:
Shea, why are you so sure that Iraq wants to bomb the US?

they have no reason to.
if they do, the US will retaliate and the US's arsenal is enormous.

Saddam doesnt want to start shit.
thats what every1 said about hitler and mousilini too isn't it
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,373
2
0
39
#26
I think Bush and Saddam should just knuckle up and go toe to toe. They should set up a fight on national TV...like a CNN special or some shit. I know Id take the time outta my day to watch Bush get his ass beat.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,373
2
0
39
#27
And the thought that Saddam is gonna attack America is a fuckin joke. He's evil, but he's far from stupid. See, what separates Saddam from all the terrorists is that he actually cares about living. And he, just like the leader of any other country in this world, knows that nuking the US would result in swift and complete destruction of his entire country. Now this is a guy who has a dozen lookalikes and never sleeps in the same bed twice....obviously because he doesnt wanna die. But he's gonna commit suicide by bombing the US just for the sake of killing Americans? I dont get why people haven't stopped to look at this from a common sense angle.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#28
YoungVicious said:
And the thought that Saddam is gonna attack America is a fuckin joke. He's evil, but he's far from stupid. See, what separates Saddam from all the terrorists is that he actually cares about living. And he, just like the leader of any other country in this world, knows that nuking the US would result in swift and complete destruction of his entire country. Now this is a guy who has a dozen lookalikes and never sleeps in the same bed twice....obviously because he doesnt wanna die. But he's gonna commit suicide by bombing the US just for the sake of killing Americans? I dont get why people haven't stopped to look at this from a common sense angle.
your right he isnt stupid obviously but he is psychotic (sp).

why would bombing america be like suicide. bin laden isnt dead yet. maybe sadamn thinks he could hit and run too. we all seen what happened when we ignored bin laden can we do the same for sadamn?
 
Apr 25, 2002
10,848
198
0
39
#29
Mcleanhatch said:


thats nothing new, minorities have always been at the bottom.

in the 1700's it was the irish and other western europeans, in the 1800's it was the italians and other eastern europeans, in the 1900's it was blacks, hispanics, middleeasterners and slavics.

and what does that have to do with national security anyway
1700s slavery was still in america n killing of many native tribes

1800s the slaughter and mass genocide of millions native people ,this and it was going on befor the 1800s , andrew jackson killed many seminoles and was called a hero , look at custerd , look at genral sherman, the chineese who worked on the rail roads risked there lives alot died in hope , slavery was still going on for a while during the 1800s


many "hispanics" ancestory are indegenous , recordnize mexicans are of many tribes to the toltec , mexica , and even mayans , we share a very simliar history with american tribes. most spanish men who took "native wives" most likey raped them.
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,134
4
0
53
www.mexica-movement.org
#30
iran and saudi arabia is the closest thing to a democratic govt.
cmon dog havent you been keeping up ..there is numerous evidence that saudi arabia is funding these terrorists groups ..did you forget ben ladin is from saudi arabia...iraq is just a smoke screen ...that fool couldnt shoot a bird with a bb gun if he wanted too..check the link,to see what im talking about
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,134
4
0
53
www.mexica-movement.org
#32
Testimony to the U.S. Congress contradicted assertions by the Bush administration that Saudi Arabia has stopped financial support for organizations linked to terrorism.

Last week, three Saudi princes and major Saudi banks were listed as defendants in a $1 trillion suit filed by the families of the victims of the Sept. 11 Al Qaida attacks on New York and Washington. Among the princes is Saudi Defense Minister Prince Sultan Bin Abdul Aziz.

Levitt told the Senate that Saudi Arabia has avoided a genuine crackdown on Islamic charities accused of funding terrorists because this could reveal donations by high-ranking Saudi princes. He said that despite the suicide attacks on New York and Washington "Saudi officials have exhibited, at a minimum, a clear pattern of tolerating funds earmarked for extremist purposes."

The testimony to the Senate was in line with that of other U.S. counterinsurgency experts that dismissed Saudi efforts to halt financing to Al Qaida and allied groups.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#33
YOuNg WiNo said:


1700s slavery was still in america n killing of many native tribes

1800s the slaughter and mass genocide of millions native people ,this and it was going on befor the 1800s , andrew jackson killed many seminoles and was called a hero , look at custerd , look at genral sherman, the chineese who worked on the rail roads risked there lives alot died in hope , slavery was still going on for a while during the 1800s


many "hispanics" ancestory are indegenous , recordnize mexicans are of many tribes to the toltec , mexica , and even mayans , we share a very simliar history with american tribes. most spanish men who took "native wives" most likey raped them.
exactly what my point was nearly all minorities has gone through that faze.

only thing i dont get is what natives are you talking about that were slaughtered and mass genocide in the 1800's
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#34
WiCkEd said:
cmon dog havent you been keeping up ..there is numerous evidence that saudi arabia is funding these terrorists groups ..did you forget ben ladin is from saudi arabia...iraq is just a smoke screen ...that fool couldnt shoot a bird with a bb gun if he wanted too..check the link,to see what im talking about
i acknowledge that because saudi arabia is playing both sides. behind the scenes it appears they are with us (their govt) but they have to also play the other side to calm the radical masses.

do you know where our biggest military base in the middle east is
 

EDJ

Sicc OG
May 3, 2002
11,608
234
63
www.myspace.com
#35
MCLEANHATCH,
WHAT DOES IT gOT TO DO WITH NATIONAL SECURITY?! THIS JUST LET'S ME KNOW HOW BLIND YOU IS. ALL THESE LAWS AND NEW LAWS BEIN' CREATED CAUSE OF THE PARANOIA OF THE gOVERNMENT AND THE PREDOMINANT MAJORITY MASSES OF THE U.S. NOW RACIAL PROFILIN' IS JUSTIFIED CAUSE OF THIS. NOW MORE FREEDOMS ARE BEIN' TOOKEN CAUSE OF THIS. NOW FBI, POLICE OR N-E BASTARD COULD JUSTIFY THEIR ACTIONS AND INJUSTICES IN THE NAME OF NATIONAL SECURITY. I THOUgHT THE WORLD WAS FUCCED OFF BEFORE 9-11. THE gAME DONE gOT TIgHTER.
 
Apr 25, 2002
1,373
2
0
39
#36
Mcleanhatch said:
why would bombing america be like suicide. bin laden isnt dead yet. maybe sadamn thinks he could hit and run too. we all seen what happened when we ignored bin laden can we do the same for sadamn?
Ummm....there is a big difference between the leader of a country and a terrorist with nothing to lose. Any country in this world knows that nucular bombing of the US would result it swift and complete destruction of their entire country. Sure, Saddam could bomb the US and then run out of his country to safety....but what is he without a country to rule? So yes, him bombing America would be suicide....and he's smart enough to know that if he's smart enough to elude all the people that have wanted to kill him in his lifetime. Its pretty obvious that life and power is all that matters to him. But he's gonna throw all that away just for the sake of killing some Americans? Yea right
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#39
EDJ said:
NOW FBI, POLICE OR N-E BASTARD COULD JUSTIFY THEIR ACTIONS AND INJUSTICES IN THE NAME OF NATIONAL SECURITY. I THOUgHT THE WORLD WAS FUCCED OFF BEFORE 9-11. THE gAME DONE gOT TIgHTER.

tighter for who? if you are a law abiding-citizen then you have nothing to worry about.