Week 4: Seahawks @ Colts

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Which team will win? Seahawks or Colts?


  • Total voters
    43
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#62
Alright man. I'll give it to you. Injuries kill you guys every week I guess.

That being said, it's time to start looking for more durable players because injuries are as much a part of football as first downs are.
 
Feb 14, 2004
16,667
4,746
113
41
#65
too many old players on that seahawk team
The oldest active player in the game was Patrick Kerney, and he made no mistakes. I blame the loss on Frye. I already knew Peyton was going to have a field day with our D, though. Our O-line sucks big time. We got pretty much a 3rd stringer at LT, I don't even know who replaced Rob Sims at LG when he went out during the 1st quarter of the game, and both of our Centers suck(Spencer and Vallos), have a rookie at RG in Max Unger and the 2nd stringer Ray Willis at RT. So in a nut shell, our o-line is garbage.
 
Feb 14, 2004
16,667
4,746
113
41
#66
If i'm not mistaken the Colts were missing a few starters as well.
If i'm not mistaken the Colts can win games with their main starter Peyton. No other NFL team is as banged up as the Hawks. A team needs all of their key players to play a game. This was pretty much a practice game for Peyton.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#67
No other NFL team is as banged up as the Hawks.
Like I said, it's time to start looking for more durable, quality players. Jonas Jennings was a very good Tackle for us, but he was always hurt so he rarely helped us. You can't use injury as an excuse all year long. Teams are always looking for depth for a reason and your overall team is not very good when your depth sucks and your starters can't stay healthy.
 
Dec 3, 2005
2,626
166
63
45
#69
The oldest active player in the game was Patrick Kerney, and he made no mistakes. I blame the loss on Frye. I already knew Peyton was going to have a field day with our D, though. Our O-line sucks big time. We got pretty much a 3rd stringer at LT, I don't even know who replaced Rob Sims at LG when he went out during the 1st quarter of the game, and both of our Centers suck(Spencer and Vallos), have a rookie at RG in Max Unger and the 2nd stringer Ray Willis at RT. So in a nut shell, our o-line is garbage.
you blame the loss on Frye? just Frye huh? off all the piss poor football that seattle put out there today you are blaming Frye. there is lots of blame to go around but saying "I blame the loss on Frye" is retarded. i agree our o line is garbage but if we had all starters healthy on the offensive line we still wouldnt have won.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#74
This season is more or less lost already. I don't know how i feel about the coaching staff and these injuries are just the icing on the cake.
Looks like I might be right about the Seahawks finishing 3rd. I thought it would be a fight between us and the Cardinals for the division, but a lot of people were picking the Seahawks and I just didn't understand why. You guys can chalk it up to injuries or whatever you guys think is the reason, but any way you look at it, the Seahawks will likely finish 3rd in the West.

I know you guys have had a lot of key injuries, but personally I think you still would have lost all 3 of the games that you lost even if they were healthy. You guys may not have lost as badly against SF and Indy, but I still think you would have lost.

But that's just me.
 
Feb 14, 2004
16,667
4,746
113
41
#75
you blame the loss on Frye? just Frye huh? off all the piss poor football that seattle put out there today you are blaming Frye. there is lots of blame to go around but saying "I blame the loss on Frye" is retarded. i agree our o line is garbage but if we had all starters healthy on the offensive line we still wouldnt have won.
Yea more or less. But also Travis Fisher, too.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#77
No it isn't. It's still the beginning of the season, and we've yet to get some key players back. I don't think we'll stink this bad once we get them back.
Look forward to some disappointment then. They just dont look like they wanna even play out there. Wallace played better yesterday but everyone else looked like they just said "fuck it" after the 1st Q.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#78
Looks like I might be right about the Seahawks finishing 3rd. I thought it would be a fight between us and the Cardinals for the division, but a lot of people were picking the Seahawks and I just didn't understand why. You guys can chalk it up to injuries or whatever you guys think is the reason, but any way you look at it, the Seahawks will likely finish 3rd in the West.

I know you guys have had a lot of key injuries, but personally I think you still would have lost all 3 of the games that you lost even if they were healthy. You guys may not have lost as badly against SF and Indy, but I still think you would have lost.

But that's just me.
We will never know about the 9ers, becuase Matt went out and it kinda just went all bad from there.

We SHOULD have beat the Bears, but there was some "WTF" plays made by Seneca that took us OUT of the game, missed FG's, and a botched call that would have given the ball to the Seahawks, and taken AWAY a TD for the Bears.

I would take 2-2 anyday.