Week 11 Seahawks @ Vikings
- Thread starter savage
- Start date
LOL...again, terrible, as already pointed out.
Forsett rushed 9...yes, that is correct...9 times. Seattle did NOTHING to establish the running game early, and it completely screwed the game up. Here is a run down of our play calling in the first half:
first Possession = 1 rushing attempt.
second possession = 1 rushing attempt.
third possession = 1 rushing attempt.
fourth possession = 1 rushing attempt
fifth possession = 0 rushing attempts
Number of times in shotgun in the first half=12.
In the second half, it was no different:
1st: 2 rushing attempts
2nd: 1 rush attempt
3rd: 3 attempts (most on ANY drive).
So as you can see, not establishing the run early, and trying to make it work, barely, late in the game just FAILED miserably. Fault? That is COACHING.
How many games have you seen Forsett run the ball? A simple question that requires a simple answer: a number.
From what i can tell, you have watched ONE: today's. Maybe you missed last week when Forsett had 123 yards against the 4th toughest running D in the NFL, in which the Hawks established the run EARLY on: 12 times to be exact, which is nearly 3X the amount we ran THIS week in the 1st half.
What does this all mean? Seattle never stuck with the run game, played against quite possibly the best front 4 in the NFL, ON THE ROAD (where we haven't won in over a year) with quite possibly the worst OL in the league. Your analysis means CRAP because your basing a rushing performance of a non-starting RB in his FIRST game starting EVER, in his second season, with a terrible OL.
But Forsett is weak and terrible and can never play in the NFL, based on your one game analysis of him. Give this guy a job in the front office of a NFL team, somebody....he knows his shit!
:ermm:
Forsett rushed 9...yes, that is correct...9 times. Seattle did NOTHING to establish the running game early, and it completely screwed the game up. Here is a run down of our play calling in the first half:
first Possession = 1 rushing attempt.
second possession = 1 rushing attempt.
third possession = 1 rushing attempt.
fourth possession = 1 rushing attempt
fifth possession = 0 rushing attempts
Number of times in shotgun in the first half=12.
In the second half, it was no different:
1st: 2 rushing attempts
2nd: 1 rush attempt
3rd: 3 attempts (most on ANY drive).
So as you can see, not establishing the run early, and trying to make it work, barely, late in the game just FAILED miserably. Fault? That is COACHING.
How many games have you seen Forsett run the ball? A simple question that requires a simple answer: a number.
From what i can tell, you have watched ONE: today's. Maybe you missed last week when Forsett had 123 yards against the 4th toughest running D in the NFL, in which the Hawks established the run EARLY on: 12 times to be exact, which is nearly 3X the amount we ran THIS week in the 1st half.
What does this all mean? Seattle never stuck with the run game, played against quite possibly the best front 4 in the NFL, ON THE ROAD (where we haven't won in over a year) with quite possibly the worst OL in the league. Your analysis means CRAP because your basing a rushing performance of a non-starting RB in his FIRST game starting EVER, in his second season, with a terrible OL.
But Forsett is weak and terrible and can never play in the NFL, based on your one game analysis of him. Give this guy a job in the front office of a NFL team, somebody....he knows his shit!
:ermm:
I will freely admit I haven't wasted a second of my life watching a single other Seahawks game this year, or taken the time to look at their stats... if you say Forsett has done well in his role aside from this game, so be it. I DONT CARE! LOL.
btw, the "translation" bit is kinda gay... not "sexualconan" gay, but getting there... keep working on it, you'll reach those epic levels someday.
btw, the "translation" bit is kinda gay... not "sexualconan" gay, but getting there... keep working on it, you'll reach those epic levels someday.
better than the colts??
you have had 3 good wins, over the ravens and packers twice and a flukey win over the niners, the rest of the teams the vikings wins were
Detroit x2
Browns
Seahawks
when you came up against a heavyweight, the steelers, your team crumbled.
match that against the colts
they beat baltimore & seahawks just like the vikings
patriots in an epic game, houston, SF, Miami and Arizona.
They have played better competition and have a better record.
Vikings D is better than the colts, but overall and on offense Colts are better.
lol you play who you play. We're 9-1 thats all that matters. Colts have won the last 4 games by a combined 10 points, they are not dominant and the Pats gifted them that game, they didnt win it.
And i dont agree that the colts are better on offense. Vikings have more weapons, far better running game, and Favre leads the league in QB rating.
Defense wins championships. But you say the Colts are better on offensive and then somehow they are better overall but the Vikings have a better defense...doesnt make sense.
And i dont agree that the colts are better on offense. Vikings have more weapons, far better running game, and Favre leads the league in QB rating.
Defense wins championships. But you say the Colts are better on offensive and then somehow they are better overall but the Vikings have a better defense...doesnt make sense.
