WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION HAVE BEEN FOUND IN IRAQ! LOOK HERE!!

[Ethereal]

I DONT KNOW WHY YOU LEFT THAT DEAD SMILEY. IM NOT DEAD. HIS INSULT ONLY REFELECTED HIS SODOMITE BEHAVIOUR...HIS LUST FOR ANOTHER MAN. YOU ARE JUST AS BAD AS HIM BECAUSE YOU QUOTED HIM IN AGREEMENT.

No he posed a scenerio in a comedic fashion, one that holds alot of meaning. Your reply to him, and the one you just made are childish. They are from a man with nothing else to say but immature comments such as those because you feel stupid.

LOL@"IF AND WHEN THEY DO FIND THEM". WHAT I WILL DO IS ACKNOWLEDGE THE ***FACT*** THAT THE UNITED STATES SOLD IRAQ TECHNOLOGY/WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DURING THE 80'S (IRAN vs IRAQ WAR)..

That's great, but you have yet to answer the question. You just did what you constantly criticize other's for. I don't give a fuck if American gave them weapons 20 years ago, im talking about the weapons they have right now that they built themselves. Now answer the question this time.

I HAVE A RIGHT TO ASK WHATEVER I WANT JUNIOR. YOU NOR *ANYONE* ELSE ON THE SICCNESS (OR THIS PLANET) CAN DICTATE WHAT I ASK OR DONT ASK.

That is because the country you hate has given you that right. Now back to the point. Sure you can ask any question you want, but if you want to maintain credability, then you cannot ask questions in that manner without being looked down upon.

Good day, Junior.

 

[Mcleanhatch]

BACK@MCLEANHATCH. HAVE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION BEEN FOUND IN IRAQ? A YES OR NO WILL SUFFICE.
:h:

mobile bio-weapons labs have been found. that is a fact.

they didnt have any "actual weapons" in them but the fact alone that they were found indicates that they had them for a reason, and it wasnt to store ice-cream.

this WMD thing is kind of like the John Gotti thing. he got away and got away but eventually he slipped up 1 time and got caught.

here the weapons can be well hidden but eventually we will find them and then the game will be over. nevermind, the game wont be over because the moment we find them the liberals/anti-american/anti-war crowd we just change their story to "we planted them"

 

[HERESY]

No he posed a scenerio in a comedic fashion, one that holds alot of meaning.

THATS YOUR OPINION AND YOU ARE ENTITLED TO THAT. HOWEVER IT WAS DIRECTED AT ME NOT YOU SO I DIDNT SEE IT AS "COMEDY". IM SURE EVERYONE WHO READS IT CAN FORM A CONCLUSION OR THEORY AS TO WHAT HE MEANT.

Your reply to him, and the one you just made are childish.

THATS HOW I TOOK HIS STATEMENTS. I TOOK THEM TO BE CHILDISH. SO I FELT OBLIGED...

I LIKE HOW YOU CAN SPEAK UP FOR THE MAN AND TELL ME HIS REASONS FOR DOING SO...

That's great, but you have yet to answer the question. You just did what you constantly criticize other's for. I don't give a fuck if American gave them weapons 20 years ago, im talking about the weapons they have right now that they built themselves. Now answer the question this time.

ACCORDING TO WEAPONS INSPECTORS IRAQ DID/DOES NOT HAVE THE CAPABILITIES TO MAKE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. I ANSWERED THE QUESTION. ARE YOU BLIND?

That is because the country you hate has given you that right. Now back to the point. Sure you can ask any question you want, but if you want to maintain credability, then you cannot ask questions in that manner without being looked down upon

1. THE COUNTRY I HATE HAS ALSO WIPED OUT MANY CULTURES AND CIVILIZATIONS.

2.THE COUNTRY I HATE HASNT GIVEN ME *ANYTHING*. MY FREEDOM TO DO AND SAY AS I PLEASE ARE GIVEN TO ME BY *GOD*. NOT BY MAN OR A COUNTRY. EVEN IF IT MEANT *DEATH* I WOULD STILL SAY WHAT I *WANT*.

3.MAINTAIN CREDABILITY WITH WHO? YOU? YOUR PEERS?

4.LOOKED DOWN UPON BY WHO? YOUR PEERS? YOU?

5.YOU ASKED THE FOLLOWING

HERSEY: If and when they do find them, are you going to acknowledge the fact, or cover your own ass and tell us all they were planted there.

NOW IF YOU PAY ATTENTION I DID ANSWER. IF YOU LOOK CLOSELY I NEVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT WMD BEING PLANTED.


6.YOU SAID

If your not willing to accept the possibilities, that there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq,then you have no buisness in even asking that question as a means to prove anybody wrong.

DID I EVER SAY THAT I WASNT WILLING TO ACCEPT THE POSSIBILITIES?

HERE IS WHAT I PREVIOUSLY POSTED.

WHAT I WILL DO IS ACKNOWLEDGE THE ***FACT*** THAT THE UNITED STATES SOLD IRAQ TECHNOLOGY/WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DURING THE 80'S (IRAN vs IRAQ WAR)..

AND

I HAVE ACCEPTED THE POSSIBILITY THAT IRAQ MAY HAVE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION...WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION THAT IRAQ RECEIVED FROM AMERICA.

HAVE NICE DAY JOHNNY.


@MCLEANHATCH I DIDNT ASK YOU IF THEY FOUND MOBILE BIO WEAPONS LABS. I ASKED IF THEY FOUND WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.

they didnt have any "actual weapons" in them but the fact alone that they were found indicates that they had them for a reason, and it wasnt to store ice-cream.

CASE CLOSED.

MCLEANHATCH IF THE POLICE SEARCHES A HOME LOOKING FOR NARCOTICS AND THEY FIND ZIG ZAG PAPERS AND AN ASH TRAY DOES THAT MEAN THE HOME HAD WEED OR OTHER DRUGS?

CAN A PERSON BE CHARGED WITH CRACK POSSESSION IF THEY ONLY HAVE A CRACK PIPE AND LIGHTER?


BYE BYE

 

[Mcleanhatch]

2.THE COUNTRY I HATE HASNT GIVEN ME *ANYTHING*.

and it doesnt have to give any of us ANYTHING. its up to us to make something of ourself and to go out and get it ourselves.

[BMCLEANHATCH IF THE POLICE SEARCHES A HOME LOOKING FOR NARCOTICS AND THEY FIND ZIG ZAG PAPERS AND AN ASH TRAY DOES THAT MEAN THE HOME HAD WEED OR OTHER DRUGS?

CAN A PERSON BE CHARGED WITH CRACK POSSESSION IF THEY ONLY HAVE A CRACK PIPE AND LIGHTER?[/B]

no but if the police seach my home for methamthetamines. but dont find any.

and instead they find 100 gallons of denatured alcohol, a garage freezer full of ice. then at my other house they find 10 ten-pound buckets of MSM (horse vitamin), red phosforus, 30 cases of efederine tablets, and a couple other things. does that not mean that i intended on making meth? or that i already made some, sold it all, and was ready to make another batch????

 

[Ethereal]

I LIKE HOW YOU CAN SPEAK UP FOR THE MAN AND TELL ME HIS REASONS FOR DOING SO...

Really, thats funny because I never made a single comment as to his reasoning for making that statement. I just stated the obvious, that it was a coment made in a comedic fashion with alot of meaning, show me where I gave reasoning for why he made the comment?

ACCORDING TO WEAPONS INSPECTORS IRAQ DID/DOES NOT HAVE THE CAPABILITIES TO MAKE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. I ANSWERED THE QUESTION. ARE YOU BLIND?

Not that what you just said is an answer to my question, because it is not, tell me where you gave that answer before? Because if im 'blind' I must have missed yo say it before to me. Where did you say that? I don't care about what you heard, I said if weapons are found. Clearly if they are found, and they made them, then they have the capabilities smart guy.

THE COUNTRY I HATE HASNT GIVEN ME *ANYTHING*. MY FREEDOM TO DO AND SAY AS I PLEASE ARE GIVEN TO ME BY *GOD*. NOT BY MAN OR A COUNTRY. EVEN IF IT MEANT *DEATH* I WOULD STILL SAY WHAT I *WANT*.

This country hasn't given you the right to free speech? Sure, you can physically speak where ever you go, but you can speak freely here without consequences. If you went on national television and talked down on Bush, nothing would happen. Free Speech. Go to Iraq and talk down on Sadaam and them come back and cry to me about freedom of speech. Go publicly tell Castro he doen't know how to run a country and say some horrible things to him, see what happens tough guy.

3.MAINTAIN CREDABILITY WITH WHO? YOU? YOUR PEERS?
4.LOOKED DOWN UPON BY WHO? YOUR PEERS? YOU?

How about, everyone you encounter in your life. Nice way to create new irrelevant arguements.

NOW IF YOU PAY ATTENTION I DID ANSWER. IF YOU LOOK CLOSELY I NEVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT WMD BEING PLANTED.

No you didn't answer, you beat around the bush and answered questions I didn't ask. I never said, that you said anything about weapons being planted. I asked you if you were going to start crying that they were, once they are found.

DID I EVER SAY THAT I WASNT WILLING TO ACCEPT THE POSSIBILITIES?

Did I ever say that you were not willing to accept the possibilities? NO. I made a statement saying that IF you weren't willing to accept the possibilities...

HERE IS WHAT I PREVIOUSLY POSTED.

WHAT I WILL DO IS ACKNOWLEDGE THE ***FACT*** THAT THE UNITED STATES SOLD IRAQ TECHNOLOGY/WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DURING THE 80'S (IRAN vs IRAQ WAR)..

I HAVE ACCEPTED THE POSSIBILITY THAT IRAQ MAY HAVE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION...WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION THAT IRAQ RECEIVED FROM AMERICA.

I never asked you if you were willing to accept they might have weapons the U.S. gave them. I asked you if you are willing to accept the fact that they have weapons of mass destruction, that they are not supposed to have, when they are found. Your trying to set yourself up for a win win situation, see the following.

Weapons are not found: You go about parading "I told you so" to everyone who said they had illegal weapons.
Weapons are found: You blame it on the United States for giving them the weapons.

You may not be able to see the childsih way's of your actions but it's clear to me, and if your not going to man up and admit to being wrong, then im going to show everyone how your a liar and a coward.

Have a nice day Billy.

GAME OVER

:dead:

 

[HERESY]

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

and it doesnt have to give any of us ANYTHING. its up to us to make something of ourself and to go out and get it ourselves.




no but if the police seach my home for methamthetamines. but dont find any.

and instead they find 100 gallons of denatured alcohol, a garage freezer full of ice. then at my other house they find 10 ten-pound buckets of MSM (horse vitamin), red phosforus, 30 cases of efederine tablets, and a couple other things. does that not mean that i intended on making meth? or that i already made some, sold it all, and was ready to make another batch????

MCLEANHATCH I **NEVER** SAID THAT AMERICA HAS TO GIVE ANY OF US A DAMN THING. IF YOU PAY ATTENTION IT WAS YOUR BUDDY NITRO WHO SAID "THAT IS BECAUSE THE COUNTRY YOU HATE HAS GIVEN YOU THAT RIGHT".

SEE I SAID ANOTHING ABOUT AMERICA GIVING ME ANYTHING. MAYBE YOU SHOULD DIRECT YOUR STATEMENT TOWARDS HIM.

AS FAR AS IF THEY FIND SOMETHING...WELL YOU CAN BE CHARGED WITH PARAPHENELIA (CHECK SPELLING). YOU MAY EVEN BE CHARGED WITH MANUFACTURING. YOU WONT BE CHARGED WITH POSSESSION WHICH IS MY POINT.


@NITRO IM HAVING PROBLESM WITH MY CUT AND PASTE RIGHT NOW SO BEAR WITH ME. NO FORGET IT I WILL REPLY TO THIS WHEN I GET HOME. LATER.

:h:

 

[HERESY]

Really, thats funny because I never made a single comment as to his reasoning for making that statement. I just stated the obvious, that it was a coment made in a comedic fashion with alot of meaning, show me where I gave reasoning for why he made the comment?

NO YOU DIDNT MAKE A COMMENT IN REGARDS OT HIS REASON. MY APOLOGIES. HOWEVER WHAT YOU ARE DOING IS "DOWNPLAYING" THE COMMENT. IM NOT. I DIDNT TAKE IT THE SAME WAY YOU DID AND IM ENTITLED TO THAT. ONCE AGAIN MY APOLOGIES FOR THE CONFUSION.

Not that what you just said is an answer to my question, because it is not, tell me where you gave that answer before? Because if im 'blind' I must have missed yo say it before to me. Where did you say that? I don't care about what you heard, I said if weapons are found. Clearly if they are found, and they made them, then they have the capabilities smart guy.

HERE IS WHAT YOU ASKED:

HERSEY: If and when they do find them, are you going to acknowledge the fact, or cover your own ass and tell us all they were planted there.

1.I NEVER SAID ANYTHING (IN THIS THREAD) ABOUT WEAPONS BEING "PLANTED" WHAT I DID SAY WAS:

WHAT I WILL DO IS ACKNOWLEDGE THE ***FACT*** THAT THE UNITED STATES SOLD IRAQ TECHNOLOGY/WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DURING THE 80'S (IRAN vs IRAQ WAR)..

AND

I HAVE ACCEPTED THE POSSIBILITY THAT IRAQ MAY HAVE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION...WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION THAT IRAQ RECEIVED FROM AMERICA.

IF *THAT* DOESNT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION I DONT KNOW WHAT TO TELL YOU.

IF THEY ARE FOUND OR MANUFACTURED THE TECHNOLOGY CAME FROM THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT DURING THE 80'S.

This country hasn't given you the right to free speech?

NO. I HAVE FREE SPEECH *REGARDLESS* OF *ANY* MAN MADE LAW. I *WILL* SPEAK AND SHARE MY VIEWS REGARDLESS OF WHO IT MAY OR MAY NOT OFFEND. GOD GAVE ME FREE SPEECH. GOD GAVE ME LIFE, A BRAIN (WHICH I RARELY USE) A MOUTH AND A TONGUE. HE MADE ME "FREE". NOT THIS COUNTRY.

SINCE WHEN HAS FREE SPEECH BECOME A "RIGHT"????

Sure, you can physically speak where ever you go, but you can speak freely here without consequences.

NOT TRUE. I CAN SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE ILLS OF SOCIETY AND BE MURDERED (MLK). I CAN SPEAK OUT AGAINST MY FORMER ALLIES AND BE GUNNED DOWN (MALCOLM X). I CAN SAY CERTAIN THINGS THAT ARE DEEMED "THREATS" AND THOSE THINGS WILL MOST LIKELY BRAND ME AS A TERRORIST.PHONE TAPPED,HOUSE RAIDED,FILES PULLED ETC ETC ETC.

If you went on national television and talked down on Bush, nothing would happen.

I DID THIS AND IT WAS CUT FROM TELEVISION. I TALKED ABOUT THE BILDERBERGERS, THE BUSH INVOLVEMENT WITH 9-11,THE CARLYLE CORP, ARBUSTO ENERGY ETC ETC ETC. MY WORDS WERE EDITED AND DEEMED INAPPROPRIATE (SPL?)

AS FAR AS ME BEING HARMED I HAVENT BEEN HARMED "YET" BUT I WILL BE HARMED *SOON*.

Go to Iraq and talk down on Sadaam and them come back and cry to me about freedom of speech.

I NEVER CRIED TO YOU ABOUT FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR ANYTHING. IN FACT I WOULD NEVER CRY TO YOU PERIOD. BTW YOU ARE THE ONE WHO MENTIONED FREEDOM OF SPEECH. NOT ME.

IF I WERE IN IRAQ AND I FELT THE SAME WAY ABOUT IRAQ (AS I DO ABOUT AMERICA) I WOULD SPEAK OUT AND SAY WHAT I NEED TO SAY. PEOPLE HAVE DIED FOR THE RIGHT TO VOTE (SOMETHING I DONT DO BUT HEY) THE RIGHT FOR "SO CALLED" FREE SPEECH, THE RIGHT TO WORSHIP AS THEY CHOOSE AND THE RIGHT TO BE "FREE". WHAT MAKES YOU THINK I *WOULDNT* SAY THESE THINGS?

Go publicly tell Castro he doen't know how to run a country and say some horrible things to him, see what happens tough guy.

SEE THE ABOVE. YOUR PONDERING OF SUCH FOOLISHNESS LEADS ME TO BELIEVE THAT THE *ONLY* THING YOU WOULD DIE FOR IS A SILLY FLAG THATS RED, WHITE AND BLUE...

YOU LIVE AN IDIOTS LIFE....

How about, everyone you encounter in your life. Nice way to create new irrelevant arguements.

EVERYONE I ENCOUNTER IN LIFE WILL HAVE DIFFRENT TAKES ON ME. SOME WILL SAY IM A LUNATIC. SOME WILL SAY THAT IM A CHILD OF GOD. OTHERS WILL CALL ME A SATANIST AND FOLLOWER OF THE BAPHOMET SIGN.

BUT....WHAT *MAN* THINKS ABOUT ME AND HOW HE SEE'S ME DOES *NOT* DICTATE HOW *I* SEE MYSELF OR HOW *GOD* SEE'S ME.

BTW I DIDNT CREATE AN IRRELEVENT ARGUEMENT. YOU WERE THE ONE WHO INITIATED TALK ABOUT BEING LOOKED DOWN ON AND CREDABILITY (HEY IS IT SPELLED WITH AN "I" INSTEAD OF "A"?)

WANNA SEE?

if you want to maintain credability, then you cannot ask questions in that manner without being looked down upon

THE ONLY THING I DID WAS ASK YOU QUESTIONS RELEVENT TO *YOUR* STATEMENTS. BTW YOU PEOPLE ARE ALWAYS TELLING ME HOW I CAN DO THIS AND HOW I CAN DO THAT...WHY ARE YOU ALWAYS TRYING TO TELL ME HOW TO THINK OR HOW I SHOULD DO IT?

"DONT WALK LIKE THIS...DONT TALK LIKE THAT...ASK IT LIKE THIS...DONT MENTION THAT....YOU CANT SAY THAT...BECAUSE YOU DIDNT DO THIS"

YOU PEOPLE ACT LIKE PUPPETS. DO WE HAVE ANY FREE THINKERS ON THIS BOARD? PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT BRAINWASHED BY THE MEDIA, CONSERVATIVE *AND* LIBERAL THINKING?????

No you didn't answer, you beat around the bush and answered questions I didn't ask. I never said, that you said anything about weapons being planted. I asked you if you were going to start crying that they were, once they are found.

NO I DIDNT BEAT AROUND THE BUSH. I ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION. I DIDNT ANSWER QUESTIONS THAT YOU DIDNT ASK. I KNOW YOU NEVER SAID THAT I SAID WEAPONS WOULD BE PLANTED. HOWEVER *YOU* INITIATED CONVO ABOUT WEAPONS BEING PLANTED. FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT YOU NEVER MENTIONED CRYING. YOU ASKED ME ***WHAT*** I WOULD DO IF THEY FOUND WEAPONS.

HERSEY: If and when they do find them, are you going to acknowledge the fact, or cover your own ass and tell us all they were planted there.

HERE IS MY ANSWER

WHAT I WILL DO IS ACKNOWLEDGE THE ***FACT*** THAT THE UNITED STATES SOLD IRAQ TECHNOLOGY/WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DURING THE 80'S (IRAN vs IRAQ WAR)..

IF THATS NOT AN ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION I DONT KNOW WHAT TO TELL YOU.

Did I ever say that you were not willing to accept the possibilities? NO. I made a statement saying that IF you weren't willing to accept the possibilities...

HERES WHAT YOU SAID.

If your not willing to accept the possibilities, that there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq,then you have no buisness in even asking that question as a means to prove anybody wrong.

I SAID THAT IM WILLING TO ACCEPT THE POSSIBILITIES THAT WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION ARE IN IRAQ. SINCE I DO ACCEPT THE POSSIBILITIES I NOW HAVE BUSINESS (ACCORDING TO YOUR LOGIC) TO TO ASK THE QUESTION...

I never asked you if you were willing to accept they might have weapons the U.S. gave them.

NO BUT YOU DID PLACE LIMITS ON MY QUESTION BY SAYING:

If your not willing to accept the possibilities, that there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq,then you have no buisness in even asking that question as a means to prove anybody wrong.

THATS WHY I SAID I ACCEPT. DO YOU UNDERSTAND NOW?

I asked you if you are willing to accept the fact that they have weapons of mass destruction, that they are not supposed to have, when they are found. Your trying to set yourself up for a win win situation, see the following.

I COULD HAVE ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION WITH A YES OR NO. HOWEVER I ANSWERED THE QUESTION AS I SAW FIT AND THE ANSWER REMAINS.

WHAT I WILL DO IS ACKNOWLEDGE THE ***FACT*** THAT THE UNITED STATES SOLD IRAQ TECHNOLOGY/WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DURING THE 80'S (IRAN vs IRAQ WAR)..

AND

I HAVE ACCEPTED THE POSSIBILITY THAT IRAQ MAY HAVE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION...WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION THAT IRAQ RECEIVED FROM AMERICA.

THE ANSWER STILL STANDS AND NEEDS NO CLARIFICATION OR FURTHER ELABORATION.

Weapons are not found: You go about parading "I told you so" to everyone who said they had illegal weapons.

WHEN 9-11 HAPPENED I DIDNT SAY "I TOLD YOU SO"...I DIDNT SAY MUCH...EVEN THOUGH 7 DAYS PRIOR TO 9-11 I STATED THAT AMERICA WOULD SOON BE ATTACKED...AND FROM THAT ATTACK A SERIOUS WAR WOULD COME ABOUT...

Weapons are found: You blame it on the United States for giving them the weapons.

ACTUALLY IM SAYING THAT *BEFORE* WEAPONS ARE EVEN FOUND.

You may not be able to see the childsih way's of your actions but it's clear to me, and if your not going to man up and admit to being wrong, then im going to show everyone how your a liar and a coward.

1.MAN UP AND ADMIT TO BEING WRONG IN REGARDS TO WHAT?

2.YOU WANT ME TO ANSWER HOW *YOU* WANT ME TO ANSWER. I WONT DO THAT. I WILL ANSWER HOW I WANT TO.

3.PLEASE SHOW EVERYONE HOW I AM A LIAR AND COWARD. I WOULD LOVE TO LAUGH AT YOUR FINDINGS. PERHAPS THEY WILL PROVIDE MORE LAUGHTER THAN ZERO MEDIAS HOMO EROTIC CONTENT.

Have a nice day Billy.

I WILL SMIDDY. THANKS FOR THINKING ABOUT ME.

GAME OVER

I STILL HAVE QUARTERS LEFT.




:classic:

EXCUSE ALL TYPOS BUDDY.

:h:

 

[Mcleanhatch]

Re: NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MCLEANHATCH I **NEVER** SAID THAT AMERICA HAS TO GIVE ANY OF US A DAMN THING. :h:

then what is this

2.THE COUNTRY I HATE HASNT GIVEN ME *ANYTHING*.

AS FAR AS IF THEY FIND SOMETHING...WELL YOU CAN BE CHARGED WITH PARAPHENELIA (CHECK SPELLING). YOU MAY EVEN BE CHARGED WITH MANUFACTURING. YOU WONT BE CHARGED WITH POSSESSION WHICH IS MY POINT.
:h:

exactly, point is you will get charged and you will pay/suffer the consequences

 

[Ethereal]

I NEVER SAID ANYTHING (IN THIS THREAD) ABOUT WEAPONS BEING "PLANTED" WHAT I DID SAY WAS:

You keep repeating that, but I never said you said anything about weapons being planted.

AND IF *THAT* DOESNT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION I DONT KNOW WHAT TO TELL YOU.

No it doesnt answer my question, because I didn't ask you if you were willing to accept they might have weapons American gave them. If they find weapons they are not supposed to have, then are you going to accept it or make excuses about them being planted. Leave American out of this and supply a yes or no answer.

IF THEY ARE FOUND OR MANUFACTURED THE TECHNOLOGY CAME FROM THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT DURING THE 80'S.

That's nice, but im not inquiring how they got the technology. Im sure there are many countries that received technology from us.

SINCE WHEN HAS FREE SPEECH BECOME A "RIGHT"????

U.S. Constitution.

NOT TRUE. I CAN SPEAK OUT AGAINST THE ILLS OF SOCIETY AND BE MURDERED (MLK). I CAN SPEAK OUT AGAINST MY FORMER ALLIES AND BE GUNNED DOWN (MALCOLM X). I CAN SAY CERTAIN THINGS THAT ARE DEEMED "THREATS" AND THOSE THINGS WILL MOST LIKELY BRAND ME AS A TERRORIST.PHONE TAPPED,HOUSE RAIDED,FILES PULLED ETC ETC ETC.

That is because you are affecting the lives of others and their own constitutional rights.

I DID THIS AND IT WAS CUT FROM TELEVISION. I TALKED ABOUT THE BILDERBERGERS, THE BUSH INVOLVEMENT WITH 9-11,THE CARLYLE CORP, ARBUSTO ENERGY ETC ETC ETC. MY WORDS WERE EDITED AND DEEMED INAPPROPRIATE (SPL?)

Because absolutely nobody wants to hear your cheap conspiracy theroys.

BUT....WHAT *MAN* THINKS ABOUT ME AND HOW HE SEE'S ME DOES *NOT* DICTATE HOW *I* SEE MYSELF OR HOW *GOD* SEE'S ME.

I don't give a fuck about any of that. You will not be taken serious (not like you do now) ever, if you keep on the same track. Visit some hospitals, you might find some people that share your views.

I ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION. I DIDNT ANSWER QUESTIONS THAT YOU DIDNT ASK.

I didn't ask you if you would accept that they might have weapons that America gave them, because that is the one you answered.

IM WILLING TO ACCEPT THE POSSIBILITIES THAT WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION ARE IN IRAQ.

Now was that so hard?

WHEN 9-11 HAPPENED I DIDNT SAY "I TOLD YOU SO"...I DIDNT SAY MUCH...EVEN THOUGH 7 DAYS PRIOR TO 9-11 I STATED THAT AMERICA WOULD SOON BE ATTACKED...AND FROM THAT ATTACK A SERIOUS WAR WOULD COME ABOUT...

Really? Wow, I made the same exact prediction!

Good Day Tom.

Games been over.

:dead:

 

[HERESY]

@mcleanhatch are you reading the posts? MY statement of

MCLEANHATCH I **NEVER** SAID THAT AMERICA HAS TO GIVE ANY OF US A DAMN THING.

is in response to *YOUR* statement of

and it doesnt have to give any of us ANYTHING.

when i said

2.THE COUNTRY I HATE HASNT GIVEN ME *ANYTHING*.

that was in RESPONSE to what nitro said which is:

That is because the country you hate has given you that right.

i dont see how you can logically compare the two statements and type

then what is this

LMAO!

@nitro

You keep repeating that, but I never said you said anything about weapons being planted.

i understand that you didnt say that. however YOU are the one who asked ME if i would tell you that weapons were planted.

No it doesnt answer my question, because I didn't ask you if you were willing to accept they might have weapons American gave them. If they find weapons they are not supposed to have, then are you going to accept it or make excuses about them being planted. Leave American out of this and supply a yes or no answer.

its hard to leave america out of the equation because america has provided iraq weapons in the past. its not logical to leave america out of the equation when america has sent troops to iraq. your question is:

If they find weapons they are not supposed to have, then are you going to accept it or make excuses about them being planted.

once again my answer stands. WHAT I WILL DO IS ACKNOWLEDGE THE ***FACT*** THAT THE UNITED STATES SOLD IRAQ TECHNOLOGY/WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION DURING THE 80'S (IRAN vs IRAQ WAR). thats what i will do. if they find weapons in iraq will you eat a grenade????

That's nice, but im not inquiring how they got the technology. Im sure there are many countries that received technology from us.

the only thing you seemed concerned about is if they have them or not...LMAO! why arent you concerned with where the weapons (if they exist) came from?

U.S. Constitution.

hmmmmm interesting. considering blacks were still slaves at that time of the constitution. once again the us constitution has given me NOTHING. i have FREE will to do as I see fit. AM I GOVERNED BY THE LAW OF THE LAND? YES. HOWEVER IM NOT *BOUND* BY THAT LAW. CAN YOU TELL THE DIFFERENCE? TO IMPLY THAT A DOCUMENT(S) GAVE ME THE "RIGHT" TO DO WHAT I AM ALREADY CAPABLE OF IS OUTLANDISH. WHATS NEXT? THE CONSTITUTION WILL ALLOW ME TO BREATH AIR? TO COOK STEAK? TO READ A BIBLE? LMAO@A PIECE OF PAPER GIVING YOU THE "RIGHT" TO DO WHAT YOU CAN ALREADY DO.

That is because you are affecting the lives of others and their own constitutional rights.

i disagree. im not doing anything to anyone. im simply speaking my mind. im not telling anyone to strap bombs to their neck and blow up the pentagon.

Because absolutely nobody wants to hear your cheap conspiracy theroys.

sure they dont.

I don't give a fuck about any of that. You will not be taken serious (not like you do now) ever, if you keep on the same track. Visit some hospitals, you might find some people that share your views.

visit some hospitals and see children that died by the hands of the filthy americans? visit people that have bomb shrapnel in their face? or how about visiting people in america that are dying while the government sends a robot to the moon?

Now was that so hard?

i typed that like 3 or 4 responses ago. i dont know why you missed it.

Really? Wow, I made the same exact prediction!

i dont believe you.

Good Day Tom.

ok PETER (CTFU)

Games been over.

BUT YOU KEEP PLAYING. YOU MUST HAVE MORE QUARTERS THAN I....

:h:

 

[Mcleanhatch]

@ Heresy

by saying that i took it that you were implying that the country owed you something but never gave you anything. if you didnt imply that, then my bad. but it really did appear as if you were implying that

 

[HERESY]

^^^ NAW MAN. JUST RESPONDING TO WHAT WAS THROWN MY WAY.

:h: