usa gives up on the "war on drugs"

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#41
I only read the last page of this thread but I can tell you for a fact that it is not a well known fact that the CIA controls 90% of the drug trade. The degree to which the CIA controls the drug trade can only be theorized and speculated. The first thing you would have to do is directly link the CIA with El Chapo because dude controls more than the remaining 10% (please don't post any google articles affirming their affiliation with one another). Further, the term "control" as it applies here is very ambiguous.

I think breh-Infamous is just pointing out that you're being oddly-specific. You should have just said "the CIA controls much of.." and I'm sure there would have been no arguement from anyone.
 
Dec 5, 2011
131
232
0
40
#42
Just because a couple of dumbasses don''t know about these facts doesn't mean it's not a well known fact. Everyone i know knows this shit. And who the fuck cares if it's 90 or 80 or even 60 percent. The CIA controls more than half the drug trade in the world, which means they basically control it all. My point was that the US government is once again responsible for the war they're "fighting".
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#44
Just because a couple of dumbasses don''t know about these facts doesn't mean it's not a well known fact. Everyone i know knows this shit. And who the fuck cares if it's 90 or 80 or even 60 percent. The CIA controls more than half the drug trade in the world, which means they basically control it all. My point was that the US government is once again responsible for the war they're "fighting".
90%
80%
60%
100%

GOT IT.
 

Legman

پراید آش
Nov 5, 2002
7,458
1,948
0
37
#47
the way you said that, is similar to how my homie tells his bitch to stop doin/sayin dumb shit lol
 
Aug 23, 2002
896
78
28
36
#48
do I gotta break this down again? I AGREE WITH YOU

but it is NOT a WELL KNOWN FACT that the CIA controls 90 PERCENT of the drug trade in the ENTIRE WORLD .

That is a THEORY

Once again, I AGREE THAT THE CIA HAS AND ALWAYS WILL HAVE ITS HAND IN A TON OF SHADY SHIT INCLUDING DRUGS, I AM NOT TRYING TO ARGUE THAT THEY DON'T, PEOPLE CAN STOP QUOTING MY POST THINKING I'M AGAINST THEM, I'M NOT, I AM WITH YOU

LOL holy shit
Lol I didn't even read much past what your post, just was adding that Iran contra shows they do have a hand in drug trafficking. You are right though that no one knows how much of a hand they have in it though.. It is extremely retarded to say that the cia controls or even had a hand in 90 % of drugs trade. Most likely they just look the other way and don't pursue certain players in trafficking, because they would jeopardize something they are doing or damage diplomatic relations with a country.
 
Apr 20, 2005
2,938
290
0
#52
i think he was exaggerating when he said 90%. it might b 87.9%. y we got troops out in afghan patrolling poppy plants. patrolling? a real war on drugs would just burn down all the fields. coke & mary jane fields included. people who can change the world (super wealthy people) for the good will not trade all the blow jobs and fresh pussy they get to make everybody else in the world happy. thats a fact. dont know if its well known or not. miami vs okc on espn at @8. gonna b a good ass game
 
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
39
#55
Just because a couple of dumbasses don''t know about these facts doesn't mean it's not a well known fact. Everyone i know knows this shit. And who the fuck cares if it's 90 or 80 or even 60 percent. The CIA controls more than half the drug trade in the world, which means they basically control it all. My point was that the US government is once again responsible for the war they're "fighting".
90% is a big jump from 60%. and besides because it's been said doesnt mean it's a well known fact. like most people think the govt had it's hand in 9/11 but it isnt a fact considering no one admitted to it and whatnot. i think you misinterpret the defintion of fact.

#wellknownfact
 
Jan 29, 2005
11,578
89,275
113
41
PHX
#59
damn

Monica Belucci got some of the best tiddies in the game, but Shakira got one of the best booties in the game

might gotta go with Shakira on this one, cause i'm a fan of tiddies in all shapes and sizes, but a good booty + a chick that knows how to move that booty = winner
 
May 15, 2002
4,689
15
38
#60
Here's a theory of mine. I don't have any evidence to back it up as of yet. I'm not trying to sound like a conspiracy theorist, but here's what I think.

The whole war on drugs was never a war to begin with. It seemed like a continuous triangle for three industries to get paid.
1. Drug dealers make tons of money in an illegal business sector, the government allows them to do this as long as they don't get too sloppy and make it too obvious. This illegal business sector has a real demand, but its illegal. The government, however, still wants the money that sector makes. Then when that dealers hits a certain level, federal agents swoop in, shut the party down and confiscate all the money and dope. The money and dope, of course, goes back to the government.
2. After the confiscation, the drug Kingpin and all of his workers are sent to prison. So now the prisons are making money off of the inmates' labor.
3. The government then turns around and puts the dope right back on the street and repeat the process again. Of course they have to bust the petty dealers to make the war appear real. I'm not making a conspiracy out of it. To me, it sounds like pure economics.

I really don't understand why the government would even go through all this when legalizing certain drugs would make them more money than doing it on the DL.