However, never under Clinton or Bush 41 have our global "influence" or actions been this staunch. This current administration's global policy choices have the most far-reaching and generally talked about, lauded/criticized, analyzed, etc. This Administration's actions have been the most far-reaching and internationally causal in recent history. Not since Reagan have we seen such aggressive foreign policy.
Clinton, Bush 41, Carter, etc. could not be / have not been accused of actions with such scope and global implications. Yes, they all made decisions dealing with foreign policy, but they did not go about, as Bush has, on a campaign of imposition of American will across the globe. Yes, it might seem "fair and balanced" to bring up the past 18 presidents on foreign policy matters, but Bush's have been the most public, the most relevant, and the most glaring examples of foreign intervention...so unfortunately, the "Bush bashing" very much has a place in this thread.
Insofar as this board exists to discuess theory, history, etc., it is also very much tied to current events. Your insistence that we must ignore Bush in this thread is tantamount to me asking that Christianity and Islam be ignored in a study of world religions. It simply isn't practical or efficacious.