these 2 are just barely scratching the surface..
Couture Vs Coleman---These are two legends that will most likely never get a belt or even title shot again, Why not have them fight?
Liddel Vs Franklin---Liddel was supposed to fight Tito for the show and for their feud, Tito dropped out because of injury and they needed a replacement with a big name. Rich will also probably never see a title fight again and the same for Chuck so once again why not have them fight?
i mean, seriously?
lol
EDIT: plus Dan Hardy vs GSP, Maia vs Silva..
Forest was trying to move up the ranks and Tito was a big name and at the time it didnt appear that Tito was on such a decline and Tito was trying to establish himself as a fighter again.
Dan Hardy was on a 7 fight win streak and GSP had not fought since UFC 100 (this fight was UFC 111) the WW belt needed to be on the line to someone, who else was there?
Maia had won 12 out of his last 13 and Silva had not defended the belt since UFC 97 (this fight was UFC 112). Vitor Belfort was injured, so who else should he have been fighting?
This was on free TV and both guys had simliar fighting styles, which SHOULD have made for a war of fist and someone getting KO'ed. If Kimbo would have won in dominating fashion it could have shown he can hang with power punchers like Houston and if Houston won it would have been a small win that he needed to help stay in the UFC and his chance to prove that Kimbo is not on the level of the lower UFC guys. The fight ended up proving nothing for either but no one knew that when the fight was made.
Strikeforce puts on garbage like, Brett Rogets Vs Fedor then what happens the man that lost to Fedor (Brett Rogers) gets a title shot now that is pathetic. Now even more pathetic is the talk of Werdum fighting Fedor in a rematch when that fight was supposed to be for the #1 contender spot and the winner fighting Overeem.