U.S. using illegal weapons of mass destruction

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#21
2-0-Sixx said:
I can count about 7 RECENT threads where you have NOT answered the questions or you danced around them. You are a disgrace to the siccness. Do the world a favor and take a nice long bath. And dont forget to slit your wrists while your in the tub.:dead:
i have totally avoided those questions because the only CREDIBLE sources that have real information would be the Government, and you guys totally discredit anything the government puts out. so why waste time.

therefore the questions that were asked by heresy are totally unanswerable. (and well worded so that they couldnt be answered).

oh ya and those 7 recent threads you are talking about is the same person asking the same questions in every post. andd they are questions that were asked a couple months back. and they were answered, yet the answers were not favorable. so they were discarded by the asker who claime that they wre never answered.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#23
@mcleanFUCKMEHARD IM OFFICIALLY TELLING YOU TO SHUT THE FUCK UP!

HERE IS WHAT YOU SAID:
i have totally avoided those questions because the only CREDIBLE sources that have real information would be the Government, and you guys totally discredit anything the government puts out. so why waste time.
LMAO! SO IF THE ONLY CREDIBLE SOURCE IS THE GOVERNMENT *WHY* SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE YOU? DO THIS MCLEANHATCH (BEFORE YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP).SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE.

therefore the questions that were asked by heresy are totally unanswerable. (and well worded so that they couldnt be answered).
LMAO!!!!!!! MCLEANHATCH THESE ARE SIMPLE QUESTIONS MAN. SIMPLE WHEN WHAT WERE AND WHY QUESTIONS. IM NOT TALKING ABOUT THE 50 OR SO QUESTIONS I POSTED AWHILE BACK. IM TALKING ABOUT THE QUESTIONS I ASKED *YOU* IN REGARDS TO *YOUR* STATEMENT THAT IRAQ HAS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. IF IRAQ HAS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (ACCORDING TO YOU THEY DO) PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:

WHEN WERE THESE WEAPONS FOUND?

WHERE WERE THESE WEAPONS FOUND?

WHO FOUND THESE WEAPONS AND WHO REPORTED THE FINDINGS TO THE U.N?

WHAT WERE THESE WEAPONS MADE OF AND WHERE DID THE MATERIAL COME FROM?

I HAVE NOT ASKED THESE QUESTIONS SEVERAL MONTHS AGO.

STOP SAYING SHIT IF YOU DONT HAVE ANYTHING TO BACK IT UP PISS ANT.




:dead:
 
Oct 3, 2002
266
0
0
46
www.beat-tech.com
#26
During the Gulf War up to 800 tons of munitions containing depleted uranium were used by United States forces in military actions in Kuwait and Iraq. This was the first field test of these weapon in actual combat, and they proved to be exceptionally effective anti-tank projectiles due to their superior armour-piercing capacity. It is unclear how much of the discarded shell casings and other radioactive material still remains in Iraq, but several investigators who have traveled to the area reports that shell casings containing depleted uranium are scattered all over the ground in many areas, including in school yards and other similar civilian locales.

Depleted uranium is the super weapon of the '90s; used in the Gulf War and the conflict in Kosovo. But now Canadian troops, soldiers and peacekeepers alike, may be exposed to depleted uranium with its potential danger. Now this threat wasn't one raised by a hostile enemy, but by the arms used by the United States and other NATO allies. They defeated the toughest armoured vehicles with the use of depleted uranium. It packed a knockout punch, but what soldiers often didn't know was that depleted uranium poses a threat to victor as well as vanquished.

What is depleted uranium?
Depleted uranium is still uranium. There are three types of uranium, U238, U234 and U235. Uranium 234 and 235 are fissionable material, the kind used in bombs. Depleted uranium is what is left over when the U234 and U235 is removed. The remaining U238 is still highly radioactive.


Depleted uranium shell
Depleted uranium shell A DU round is made from the leftover U238. The killing punch comes from the solid depleted uranium metal rod in the shell. A 120 mm tank round contains about 4000 grams or 10 pounds of solid DU.


DU shell hits
A DU rod is very dense. At high speed, it slices through tanks like a hot knife through butter. It burns on impact, creating flying bits and dust that are toxic and radioactive with a half-life of 4.2 billion years.

In the Gulf War, the U.S. fired almost a million DU rounds, leaving a battlefield littered with 1,400 wrecked radioactive Iraqi tanks, crawled over by victorious GI's who were breathing in contaminated dust.

If you want to read on: http://www.tv.cbc.ca/national/pgminfo/du/

For you non-believers that think the US has never used Depleted Uranium in Iraq, Kosovo or anywhere else, then check out these D.U. links

This is a really good Link as well Human Rights and Toxics: Depleted Uranium and the Gulf War
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#28
ReservoirDog said:
For you non-believers that think the US has never used Depleted Uranium in Iraq, Kosovo or anywhere else, then check out these D.U. links[/URL]
i think every1 knows that we used depleted uranium. what i am saying is that depleted uranium isnt radio active enough to cause any bodily harm to american soldiers.

i could be wrong. i dont claim to be all-knowing like others here on the left but from what i have heard those are the characteristics of delpleted uranium
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
47
www.soundclick.com
#32
Mcleanhatch said:


i think every1 knows that we used depleted uranium. what i am saying is that depleted uranium isnt radio active enough to cause any bodily harm to american soldiers.

i could be wrong. i dont claim to be all-knowing like others here on the left but from what i have heard those are the characteristics of delpleted uranium
I don't know if it was Tommy Franks, but I was watching a press conference being held regarding the war and this cat was asked about the effects of D.U....
This was during the first week of operation Iraqi Freedom.
I'm quoting what he said,
"We know that depleted uranium is only harmful if it's digested or taken into the system"....

This surprised the hell out of me....
For the first time, a military official admits that D.U. is harmful.
Which is contradictory to US government sponsered lab tests which indicate that D.U. is practically harmless....
 
Oct 3, 2002
266
0
0
46
www.beat-tech.com
#33
yeah the above link I posted says that the extensive use of DU weapons, caused extensive pollution to regions in south Iraq and neighbouring areas of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Some transmissions occured indirectly through pollution of the environment: soil, plant, food, animal, surface, air and ground water. Also DU shrapnel wounds have played a direct role in related medical problems. Which caused an increase in cancer, especially lymphoma, leukemia, lung, bone, brain, gastro-intestinal and liver cancers. The increase reached a maximum in 1996 and the majority of the cases (averaging 84% for the period 1993-97) are among military personnel exposed to DU explosions... Impact of Depleted Uranium on Man and Environment in Iraq
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,446
494
83
#35
Mcleanhatch said:


the only CREDIBLE sources that have real information would be the Government
LMFAO!!! THAT HAS TO BE THE STUPIDEST COMMENT I HAVE HEARD IN YEARS.

The govt doesnt give a fuck even about its own troops. Anyone thats taken a Cold War history class hopefully has seen our own Government drop a NUCLEAR BOMB in Nevada and have a brigade of our own soldiers charge the smoke to practice an "invasion!" Our government isnt gonna release shit that goes against its initial word or makes it look inhumane.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#36
MCLEANHATCH CONTINUE TO AVOID THE QUESTIONS THAT YOU NEVER ANSWERED....

IM TALKING ABOUT THE QUESTIONS I ASKED *YOU* IN REGARDS TO *YOUR* STATEMENT THAT IRAQ HAS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. IF IRAQ HAS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION (ACCORDING TO YOU THEY DO) PLEASE ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:

WHEN WERE THESE WEAPONS FOUND?

WHERE WERE THESE WEAPONS FOUND?

WHO FOUND THESE WEAPONS AND WHO REPORTED THE FINDINGS TO THE U.N?

WHAT WERE THESE WEAPONS MADE OF AND WHERE DID THE MATERIAL COME FROM?

I HAVE NOT ASKED THESE QUESTIONS SEVERAL MONTHS AGO.


@ THE OTHERS HOW MANY OF YOU LOOKED AT THOSE PICS,GIGGLED,SMIRKED OR LAUGHED?


:h:
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
47
www.soundclick.com
#37
ReservoirDog said:
yeah the above link I posted says that the extensive use of DU weapons, caused extensive pollution to regions in south Iraq and neighbouring areas of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Some transmissions occured indirectly through pollution of the environment: soil, plant, food, animal, surface, air and ground water. Also DU shrapnel wounds have played a direct role in related medical problems. Which caused an increase in cancer, especially lymphoma, leukemia, lung, bone, brain, gastro-intestinal and liver cancers. The increase reached a maximum in 1996 and the majority of the cases (averaging 84% for the period 1993-97) are among military personnel exposed to DU explosions... Impact of Depleted Uranium on Man and Environment in Iraq
Thank you
 
Oct 3, 2002
266
0
0
46
www.beat-tech.com
#39
HERESY, you are trying to argue with a guy who actually said this:
Mcleanhatch said:
what i am saying is that depleted uranium isnt radio active enough to cause any bodily harm to american soldiers.
No matter what Mcleanhatch says, it's going to be completely wrong and bias seeing how right wing neoconservative he is.