TNA's 3 "HUGE" surprise names for tonight.

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
306

306

Sicc OG
#21
Oct 4, 2002
2,249
0
0
47
#21
When Impact started with Hogan and Flair out there I was excited becasue I thought that ment that they had something much better planned for the main event and the rest of the show. I can't fucking believe that the show revolved around those two. Flair had the best retirment in the history of wrestling. He shit on all the fans that watched him cry for 3 days over that wrestlemaina 24 weekend by stepping back into the ring.

I refuse to watch Hall and Waltmen. And the Nasty Boys. Fuck them to.
 
GHP

GHP

Sicc OG
#23
Jul 21, 2002
16,280
852
113
45
#23
while WWE is bringing in legit talent from ROH and coming up with innovative ideas like NXT, TNA is bringing in every wash up who got popped for drugs or has beens that should have retired 10 years ago. Are they trying to bring back Hall too?
 
Cheaptimes

Cheaptimes

C'mon now...
#25
Jan 3, 2005
4,591
2,123
113
46
www.twitter.com
#25
MrDiamondFDC said:
I watched Raw, but I was so fucked up that I don't remember shit that happened.
Click to expand...
It was honestly a dukie Raw, but I think they did that on purpose. Why? I dont know. the "Mind Freak" did some card tricks, and pulled hornswaggle out of Jillian halls cleavage (j/k) Main event was cool, but thats about it.
Didnt watch TNA. I hear some other folks saying that TNA was a great episode and if that true, can they do it again? Anyone can have one good episode, what are you going to do to follow it up next week and the week after that. WWE will still have more viewers for last night though.
 
E

ESFCE

Sicc OG
#26
Dec 4, 2004
6,223
2,042
113
#26
I dont know why folks are so hard on TNA....I think it was a great show. Every division was represented.... X Division, Womens....they turned Sting heel in one night...there were some surprises. And alot more wrestling than on recent Impacts, which is a plus.

I have yet to watch Raw but I hope Impact is like this every week...
 
Nebulizah

Nebulizah

Sicc OG
#27
Jun 9, 2007
5,122
11
0
#27
ugh. to each their own. Impact was terrible. Blown spots, bad execution, poor excuses for "surprises," washed up old men selling chair shots. It was as if somebody put some PCP in the retirement home's meatloaf & then filmed the consequences.
 
Zer0.MediA

Zer0.MediA

Sicc OG
#29
Nov 14, 2002
15,455
537
113
41
#29
Impact played out to be a great show this week. Even though it's a detriment to the company, I like the "We have no idea what the fuck we're going to do next" atmosphere you feel about the show. It's a lot like Raw back in the attitude era.
 
D

Darkshowdown

Sicc OG
#30
Feb 8, 2003
22,839
1,850
0
#30
Sting raw now whopping niggas with teh bat. WTF did they let RVd squashed him so fast then get whooped with the bat like a bitch? made no sense.


Also i told that one dude on here that jeff hardy joined tna
 
E

ESFCE

Sicc OG
#33
Dec 4, 2004
6,223
2,042
113
#33
Zer0.MediA said:
Impact played out to be a great show this week. Even though it's a detriment to the company, I like the "We have no idea what the fuck we're going to do next" atmosphere you feel about the show. It's a lot like Raw back in the attitude era.
Click to expand...
Exactly, I felt that whole Attitude Era vibe...based off the fact that there were unexpected things happening....impromptu match with Eric Young vs. Syxx Pac....Sting being built as a full blown heel in one night.....and Jeff Hardy coming out at the end for no good reason besides to make a surprise....I think Impact was the perfect combination of storylines and wrestling...it makes every other Impact since Bischoff/Hogan took over seem slow paced and like if they were holding off for something...
 
THEUNGODD666

THEUNGODD666

Sicc OG
#34
May 24, 2002
6,141
519
0
37
#34
Darkshowdown said:
*Side note*


TNA show actually turned out to be better then raw it had more excitement. raw didnt make any changes yet it was a reg show as usaual
Click to expand...
^this

but TNA still came pretty flat. I really only enjoyed that 3 way for the Xdivison title.

I was flipping back and forth between TNA and WWE and everytime I came back to WWE someone was cutting a promo


also

Chris Jericho posted his thoughts on Rob Van Dam’s debut on Twitter. Chris Jericho wrote the following:

"The beat down of RVD 20 seconds into his debut in TNA was mind boggling. I dont understand how so many talented people can be so clueless"
 
E

ESFCE

Sicc OG
#35
Dec 4, 2004
6,223
2,042
113
#35
Monday ratings

RAW: 3.4

Impact 1.0

Average....the loyal TNA viewers tuned in, but they were expecting a bigger number. I dont think they advertised the move good enough, Jan 4th was advertised way better and they made a bigger deal about it. Wonder what the Thursday replay will do, if it does over a 1.0 like the Jan 4th show Thursday replay did, then you know people are interested but just tuned into Raw, or didnt bother at all cuz they knew it would be on @ Thursday anyway.
 
E

ESFCE

Sicc OG
#36
Dec 4, 2004
6,223
2,042
113
#36
MORE RAW VS. IMPACT RATINGS INFO AND MY TAKE ON THEM
by Dave Scherer @ 6:15 PM on 3/9/2010

As mentioned earlier, Raw did a 3.4 rating. The show did hours of 3.25 and 3.5. They averaged 5,091,000 viewers.

Impact did a 0.98 rating, which rounds up to a 1.0. The show did 1,361,000 viewers.

Honestly, I think both sides can say positive things about the number. TNA averaged a 1 at a big time of year for WWE. WWE didn't see their number drop all that much from last week. This could end up being a win/win for everyone, including the fans.
 
THEUNGODD666

THEUNGODD666

Sicc OG
#37
May 24, 2002
6,141
519
0
37
#37
ESFCE said:
MORE RAW VS. IMPACT RATINGS INFO AND MY TAKE ON THEM
by Dave Scherer @ 6:15 PM on 3/9/2010

As mentioned earlier, Raw did a 3.4 rating. The show did hours of 3.25 and 3.5. They averaged 5,091,000 viewers.

Impact did a 0.98 rating, which rounds up to a 1.0. The show did 1,361,000 viewers.

Honestly, I think both sides can say positive things about the number. TNA averaged a 1 at a big time of year for WWE. WWE didn't see their number drop all that much from last week. This could end up being a win/win for everyone, including the fans.
Click to expand...
I have a feeling next weeks numbers for TNA are going to be very low
 
E

ESFCE

Sicc OG
#38
Dec 4, 2004
6,223
2,042
113
#38
I think the Thursday replays will end up having higher ratings...I kind of liked having Impact to watch on Thursdays...and its just more convenient for people to watch Raw on Monday then Impact on the regular Thursdays
 
SC_408

SC_408

Sicc OG
#39
Oct 3, 2006
5,631
1,842
113
38
#39
why the hell would they have a thursday replay from the previous monday show...thats stupid , alot of people would just stick to watchin WWE when they know they can just watch the whole replay of TNA on thursday....
 
SC_408

SC_408

Sicc OG
#40
Oct 3, 2006
5,631
1,842
113
38
#40
ESFCE said:
MORE RAW VS. IMPACT RATINGS INFO AND MY TAKE ON THEM
by Dave Scherer @ 6:15 PM on 3/9/2010

As mentioned earlier, Raw did a 3.4 rating. The show did hours of 3.25 and 3.5. They averaged 5,091,000 viewers.

Impact did a 0.98 rating, which rounds up to a 1.0. The show did 1,361,000 viewers.

Honestly, I think both sides can say positive things about the number. TNA averaged a 1 at a big time of year for WWE. WWE didn't see their number drop all that much from last week. This could end up being a win/win for everyone, including the fans.
Click to expand...
yeah alot of it is just brand loyalty...even if there were no IMPACT, Raw's rating wouldve been the same anwayys....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom