The Official 2011 Oakland Raiders offseason thread

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jan 12, 2006
13,259
1,117
0
Q&A with Raiders CB coach Rod Woodson

Paul Gutierrez
CSNCalifornia.com

NAPA -- More than a few eyebrows were raised when it was announced on Valentine's Day that Rod Woodson was joining new Raiders coach Hue Jackson's staff.

Woodson was a Hall of Famer. He already had a cushy gig as an analyst for the NFL Network. Would he be ready for the endless days of frustration trying to get guys with less than his Canton-enshrined ability to measure up?

Surely there was a typo, no? Um, no.

Woodson, who played in the NFL from 1987 through 2003, the last two seasons with the Raiders, has tackled the challenge head on, saying on reporting day that coaching teenage girls the past few years readied him for the task at hand. He was joking. Kinda.

His signature moment as a Raiders defensive back was his 98-yard interception return for a touchdown of Brian Griese in Denver in Oakland's 2002 Super Bowl season. As a coach, he hopes to create similar moments for his new charges.

Monday, Woodson spoke with reporters in his most comprehensive interview since he was hired. Following is Woodson's Q&A:

Question: What has coaching been like so far?

Answer: So far, so good. One-a-days is not tough on the coaches. It's not really, really tough on the players yet. So far, so good. I can't complain about it.

Q: Has anything surprised you yet?

A: Nope. No. Seven years removed, I've prepared myself for the worst. It hasn't gotten to that point yet, but I'm ready for the long days when the season starts.

Q: Are you a guy who isn't very vocal when coaching?

A: Well, I don't think I need to scream and holler. Every coach has his own style. At the end of the day, the train is leaving. It's going to leave with the guys or without the guys. My style is, if you want to get a paycheck, be on the train. I don't need to tell you that. At the end of the day, if you're not doing your job, you're going to get cut. That's the bottom line. That's the reality of it. Throughout my career, my coaches never really yelled at me too much. I was a player that didn't really respond to yelling. There's some guys you need to push. There's ways you find to push certain players. Other guys, you just tell them what to do, and they'll do it. You have to find your way.

Q: Which coaches influenced you?

A: Gosh, all of them. Chuck Noll, Rod Rust, Tony Dungy, Dick Labeau, Dom Capers, Bill Cowher, Steve Mariucci, Johnnie Fox -- he was a rookie coach when he was in Pittsburgh. All those guys who I coached under, I learned a little bit of something from them all.

Q: What was it like watching the Hall of Fame speeches?

A: Oh, yeah. They're getting longer. (Laughs) It feels like they're getting longer. But anytime you can go back and see the great classes that come back. I think there was like 80-something guys that went back this year. It's always good to go back and see those guys and see the guys that are getting enshrined that year.

Q: What do you think of DeMarcus Van Dyke?

A: Well, DVD is his nickname. He's going to be good. It's the little things that he has to work on. He has to learn how to finish. He's still learning the little things about playing corner in this league -- playing the different coverages, when to do certain things, when not to do certain things. But if he keeps progressing in the positive manner like he has in the first week or so, he'll be a decent player.

Q: Does Van Dyke have good hips?

A: He has great hips. He reminds me of a player that I played with in Baltimore, Duane Starks. When he got drafted coming out of The U (Miami), and we were in Baltimore, he had great hips, great feet. DVD reminds me of him. He's a little bit taller. His range, I don't think too many receivers are outrunning him. So, he has to learn to break down, move his body weight and transition when he's playing in space. If he does that, he can be a pretty good player.

Q: Your thoughts on Michael Huff?

A: Mike's a player. He's a playmaker. He has a natural instinct, a natural gift. I'm also coaching the nickels. I coach more with the other guys than I do with him. When you don't have to coach as much with a certain guy, it makes your job a little easier. That's when you know he has that natural gift. You don't have to tell him to do the little things. It just comes naturally to him.

Q: Does your Hall of Fame status help you coach so many young players?

A: It's a start. But if I tell them to go the wrong way, it's not going to last too long. I'm just trying to point them in the right direction. Each player is different. Every player learns differently. Some guys are audio learners, some guys are visual, some guys need to do the reps. The things that I did in my career, I can't ask the same guy to do the same thing. It really depends upon their abilities. Each player plays within that ability. If they can do that and I can help them cultivate their tool belt, so to speak, in their craft, then I'm doing my job as a coach.

Q: What kind of coverage does new/old defensive coordinator Chuck Bresnahan prefer?

A: Multiple. The great defenses that I played with, and I know Chuck has been around, have done a multiple of things. I don't think you can do one thing and be good at it. What has to happen in this league is, you have to make the quarterback think after he touches the football. What Chuck is trying to cultivate with his defense is, to give multiple looks, make sure we have our disguises in the secondary and linebackers and from that we move to what we're going to play in. If we can do that, then we're headed in the right direction. Chuck, what he wants to do is, give multiple looks, multiple defenses and make the quarterback guess.

Q: Is Stanford Routt an elite cornerback?

A: He can be. Stanford, he's a work in progress. He has natural gifts. Every player that gets drafted in the NFL has those gifts. He has to cultivate those gifts. He's had Willie (Brown) here for so long, he has learned under Nnamdi (Asomugha). It's his turn to learn how to play the game and learn to trust himself. The elite players learn to trust themselves on the field. Once he does that and he pulls the trigger when he has opportunities to pull the trigger, his game is going to elevate, his interceptions (are) going to go up and that's when you're going to start hearing his name more so than you have in the past.

Q: Does pulling that trigger and making that big play start that process?

A: Everything's a process. Step by step. What Stanford has done so far in this new system is, he's learning the system, he's learning how to trust himself, he's learning how to work his eyes, his balance with his feet, all the things that you need to do as a defensive back, as a defensive player, as an NFL player, to trust what you have learned in the meeting room, on the field and apply back to the practice field and game day. Those are the elite players. He's in the process of doing so.

Q: Do the Raiders really play man-to-man defense 90 percent of the time?

A: I know when I was here, we played multiple coverages. We played four, we played man, we played some zones. That's what we're going to do again. I don't know what they did in the seven or eight years that I was gone, but that doesn't matter. What matters is, this year, 2011 Raiders, that the guys buy in to what Hue (Jackson) is selling. All the guys are doing that. We're learning that there's a standard that we're asking of our players when they step on the practice field. There's a practice for when we step (on the field) on game day. And it doesn't matter if it's the first-team guy, second-team guy, the third-team guy, the standard is set. You have to live up to the standard or you won't be a Raider.

Q: Thoughts on Chris Johnson?

A: Chris can play. I like Chris. He's an old wily vet. He's kind of the same way as Stanford a little bit. He has to start trusting himself and start pulling that trigger. All the film study, everything we're giving him as coaches, everything he's learned throughout his career and from other players, once he can apply that back to the field and not hesitate, those are the guys that you really look forward to see play. C.J. is in that process. He believes that he can do certain things and as he progresses this year, he's going to have a good year.

Q: Do those guys have to play better to make up for the loss of Nnamdi?

A: Even with Nnamdi, if Nnamdi was here, I would tell Nnamdi the same thing. He didn't have a lot of picks. He was a shut-down corner but pulling the trigger gives you the opportunity to make picks. They have to start pulling that trigger. There's certain things throughout the practice, there's certain plays, you only get two or three plays as a defensive back to make plays. Once they start learning how to pull that trigger, and I'm talking about the safeties, the DBs, the linebackers, the defensive linemen, everybody, we'll be an explosive defense.

Q: Have you always wanted to coach?

A: I thought about it for years but after playing for 17 years I was offered my first few years when I first retired, but I needed to get away. So, being away for seven years, I thought this was the best time to give it a shot, see if I like it, see if I don%u2019t mess the guys up too much. If I can do that, then I'll try to make a career of it.

Read more: Q&A with Raiders CB coach Rod Woodson
Tune to SportsNet Central at 6, 10:30 and midnight on Comcast SportsNet Bay Area for more on this story
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,362
13,858
113
39
It seems like Oakland Raiders fans will have to get used to the thought of Robert Gallery not being in Oakland as the team is dealing with major change on the offensive line.

The long-time Oakland guard told ESPN’s Adam Schefter that he and Oakland owner Al Davis have agreed that it’s time that Gallery moves on in free agency.

“With the end of the league year coming today, and the few conversations I’ve had with the Raiders and Mr. Davis, we’ve come to a mutual agreement that it’s time for me to move on with my career,” Gallery said Thursday. “I appreciate the start that they and Mr. Davis gave me and I truly have enjoyed my time wearing the silver and black. I wish them well, I thank the fans and I take away great memories of my time in Oakland.

“I’m looking for a new start somewhere else, to experience another place, and to be able to accomplish some of the things I want. It’s best for everyone.”

Gallery was the No. 2 pick in the 2004, taken ahead of superstar receiver Larry Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald went one pick later to Arizona. Gallery struggled as a left tackle, but he found a comfort zone as a guard. He is Oakland’s best lineman, although left tackle Jared Veldheer showed promise as a rookie.

Oakland has many holes on the offensive line and it should be a focus in the draft and in free agency -- if the Raiders, who have spent a lot of money keeping their free agents, have anything left to spend. Oakland probably will give 2010 fourth-round pick Bruce Campbell a chance to win a guard spot and a player like Penn State center/guard Stefen Wisniewski could be a target with Oakland’s top pick at No. 48. He is the nephew of former Raiders offensive lineman Steve Wisniewski, who is now Oakland’s assistant offensive line coach.

Seattle has to be considered a top landing spot for Gallery. Former Oakland coach Tom Cable is now the Seahawks’ offensive line coach/assistant head coach. Seattle has a need at guard and Gallery and Cable are very close.

Oakland has to deal with several free agents, including star cornerback Nnamdi Asomugha. Other free agents include tight end Zach Miller, safety Michael Huff and running back Michael Bush.

http://espn.go.com/blog/afcwest/post/_/id/24976/gallery-gone-oakland-has-work-to-do-on-line
Veldheer is everything Gallery was suppose to be for us at LT, after getting paid all that money and being a bust Gallery finally found a home at tha G position.. I was hoping we'd keep him around on tha left side since Veldheer was solid @ LT and that side of tha line was performing well but fuck it.. time to move on
Fuck!!! We need to improve the O Line, not make it worse. Losing gallery is gonna hurt us a lot. Like Ras said he was a shitty ass LT but found a home at the guard position. He actually flourished at the guard spot. Him and veldeer was gonna solidify that left side, and with a year playing together(although Veldeer didn't play til mid season) I was hoping to see improved play and chemistry.

I think this will hurt us more than folks think. I hope not though. We're a running team first and foremost so that means we need a solid oline, and even when Campbell needs to throw, he's gonna need some time back there. Hopefully Bruce Campbell is ready to play some football, and protect the other campbell. Didnt some scouts say we'd draft him wit our first rd this past draft? Instead we got him at, 4th rd, I believe. Another work out warrior at the combine last year but I read he was still very raw at the position, but projected to be a tackle though not a guard.

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!
I had a feelin gallery was gonna leave....
jus don't forget how often Gallery has been injured for us.. I won't miss hearing False Start #76 every time no more either.. looks like he seen Al was dishin out big $$$ to other players and wanted in on it, but no way is he gonna get tha $8mil a year he wants somewhere else... thats wayy too pricey for a G.. we still got Loper & Bruce Campbell ready to step in and earn a roster spot ..
bet he signs with seattle lol
funny how now gallery sucks that he left. lmao. and i called it
 
May 24, 2006
6,242
8
0
37
www.fucku.com
Skizzy Ske 44


44 posts in the niner thread for u right...... lmao
Lol what does that prove chreebo?

Nothing.

I never said anything bout a 9er thread or me posting in it. Nor did I deny anything. I enjoy talking to 9er fans. So ur point is invalid, but nice try.

Again, u troll in raider threads n post in the threads than most raider fans which is the point I'm making.

So, "LMAO".
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,362
13,858
113
39
Lol what does that prove chreebo?

Nothing.

I never said anything bout a 9er thread or me posting in it. Nor did I deny anything. I enjoy talking to 9er fans. So ur point is invalid, but nice try.

Again, u troll in raider threads n post in the threads than most raider fans which is the point I'm making.

So, "LMAO".
And LOL, 7k posts compared to 1k.

Big difference. And 44 posts ain't shit wit 7k. I'm not even top a 20 poster vs U bein a top 4.

So again, "LMAO".
80% of my posts in this thread have been news/articles. but yet u in a niner thread with nothing to contribute? lmao

thats the point im making
 
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
Gallery was drafted to become a beast LT for us.. he failed miserably.. finally became above average at tha G position but yet was still trying to get paid big bucks as if he did something.. your point?
 

Chree

Medicated
Dec 7, 2005
32,362
13,858
113
39
Gallery was drafted to become a beast LT for us.. he failed miserably.. finally became above average at tha G position but yet was still trying to get paid big bucks as if he did something.. your point?
certain ppl saying he sucks now, but back before he signed elsewhere were giving him praise. and saying hes solid lol
^^^^
 
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
certain ppl saying he sucks now, but back before he signed elsewhere were giving him praise. and saying hes solid lol
he was becoming a solid G for us.. he sucked big time @ LT which is why we drafted him in tha first place... LTs get more $$ than Gs.. yet Gallery wants to be paid like a top LT
 
Jan 4, 2003
4,549
5
0
as I stated before rookie Veldheer already put it in work and earned a lot more respect in tha eyes of tha coaches and raider nation.. he's a BEAST @ LT.. something we thought Gallery woulda been.. but hey fuck it.. on to tha next who cares about that seattle seacock
 
Nov 1, 2004
2,946
78
48
39
Keep the pointless bickering in your pms. Let's just keep it about football. No one gives a fuck how many times either of you guys posted in this thread or the Niner thread.

Back to football.

Raiders have ALWAYS drafted who they wanted. It has worked out in the past and it has also not worked out. How many times we gonna go over this shit.
Gallery was a bust considering he was a first round pick. He's gone so fuck 'em.

Seabass and Lechler were considered terrible picks but they both are one of the best in the league at their positions.
You win some you lose some.
 
Jan 12, 2006
13,259
1,117
0
LT
68 Jared Veldheer
75 Stephon Heyer
70 Cody Habben

LG
60 Daniel Loper
63 Ben Lamaak

C
64 Samson Satele
61 Stefen Wisniewski

RG
66 Cooper Carlisle
67 Roy Schuening
74 Bruce Campbell

RT
69 Khalif Barnes
72 Joe Barksdale
76 Seth Wand

TE
87 Kevin Boss
83 Brandon Myers
82 Richard Gordon/
86 David Ausberry

WR
85 Darrius Heyward-Bey
18 Louis Murphy
17 Denarius Moore

WR
12 Jacoby Ford
81 Chaz Schilens
89 Nick Miller

FB
45 Marcel Reece
41 Manase Tonga
42 James McCluskey

RB
20 Darren McFadden
29 Michael Bush
36 Taiwan Jones

QB
8 Jason Campbell
7 Kyle Boller
5 Trent Edwards

Defense

DE
99 Lamarr Houston
91 Trevor Scott
78 Tommie Hill

DT
92 Richard Seymour
90 Desmond Bryant
98 Derrick Hill

DT
93 Tommy Kelly
79 John Henderson
73 Jamie Cumbie

DE
77 Matt Shaughnessy
94 Jarvis Moss
95 Mason Brodine

OLB
52 Quentin Groves
58 Bruce Davis II
40 Jerome Boyd

MLB
55 Rolando McClain
50 Travis Goethel
54 Sam Williams

OLB
96 Kamerion Wimbley
56 Darryl Blackstock
48 Bani Gbadyu

SS
33 Tyvon Branch
34 Mike Mitchell
40 Jerome Boyd

FS
24 Michael Huff
27 Stevie Brown
31 Hiram Eugene

CB
26 Stanford Routt
22 Walter McFadden
23 Jeremy Ware

CB
37 Chris Johnson
38 DeMarcus Van Dyke
28 Joe Porter

Specialists

K
11 Sebastian Janikowski
4 Glenn Pakulak

P
9 Shane Lechler
4 Glenn Pakulak


LS
59 Jon Condo


KOR
12 Jacoby Ford
89 Nick Miller
17 Denarius Moore

PR
89 Nick Miller
12 Jacoby Ford
17 Denarius Moore

H
9 Shane Lechler