No one ever said anyone said it was as good as the other movies mentioned.
I said it's
not as good as the other movies mentioned in this thread. I'd have rather re-watched one of those. Was I happy i watched it, sure i saw a new movie. Will i watch it again, no.
This movie was no thriller because there was no thrill if you've seen movies in the last 5 years.
He's an insomniac with an imaginary friend? Hmmm never done that before. Ooooo "different' camera angles and drab dark colors, how cutting edge. You mean not everything happens on a conventional time line, no! i'm shocked!
Not every film can break new ground in ANY field, let alone multiple. But good ones that don't break ground these days do something that's been done before and do it better. This film broke no ground in film making and didn't do anything better than has already been done. So there is nothing to make it stand out from the pack.
I gave it the benifit of the doubt thinking it was too obvious and they wouldn't do something so obviously done before, turns out i was wrong, but so were they.
There seems to be so much bad acting out there that people get credit for being fantastic when they act average.
And on a larger scale there seems to be so many bad movies out there that movies get credit for being fantastic when they are just average.