The EPIC picture thread. (nsfw)

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 15, 2007
1,325
150
0
38
www.facebook.com
How was he a "faggot for pulling a bitch move like that?"

Dude was there to report what's going on over there, to show the world the horrible circumstances people are living in. That baby wasn't the only starving/dieing baby where he was at.

That picture says more than words could ever say.
Exactly what I was thinking. Like someone said in an article about it: "Let those who send all their spare cash to the needy cast the first stone..."
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
^
and then?
If the dude would leave, the kid is back in the same situation.
It would only postpone his death.
And it's not like that kid is the only one suffering.
Should he have hugged all the people in Africa that are suffering like this?
Should he feed all the starving people in Africa? The dude made this photo so we here in the west can see from the comfort from our own homes what the situation is elsewhere.

A lot of people judge the dude for taking this photo, but how many of you actually do something about this yourself?

It is really easy to judge someone else, but how many of you went there yourself and started helping people out in need?
How many yourself donated money to starving people in 3th world countries?
Or donated old clothes even, instead of throwing them away.
If it bothers you so much, doesn't it seem the right thing to do...
instead of blaming other people that don't do anything to help them.
Way to go pointing your fingers somewhere else.... This really helps the starving people everywhere in the world!



I DO!
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
and im not saying anything he would have done would have changed the future for this girl, but at the same time he was within capacity to help AT THAT MOMENT..even if he would have did it after he shot the picture, a little help for a girl who never had any would have been nice way to go out even if for 5 minutes.

so its ok for this guy to win a pulitzer and gain noteriety since he know he was just doing a job, even though human instict,ethics, etc... could have easily been extended after his "money shot".
 

Ghost Dance

America's Nightmare
Nov 1, 2007
3,426
4,640
113
40
Oak Park...916
to this day I still hate this pic, poor kid no food, no water cant move vulture just waiting to pounce.

the photographer had food and water with him, went for the shot instead, and walked away.

years later killed himself over guilt and the bad things being said about him.
Well atleast there was a happy ending to the story...
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
I suppose I should add to that "imo". I mean he couldn't have slid the kid some food or water after he took the pic, profiting off of his suffering? Again, just my opinion.
He was there during a food drop. There was a famine. he hitched a ride on a plane which stopped there for only 30 minutes to give out food.

While mothers and fathers were receiving the food from the plane, the children were by themselves. The photographer, kevin carter, saw this suffering child with a vulture behind it. He took the picture then chased the vulture away.

Minutes later, after the food had been passed out, he got on the plane and left.

He was a good man. He spent his life risking his own safety taking pictures of horrible things, to expose them to the world. Mostly his work was regarding the brutality of apartheid in south africa, such as this picture, a public execution by "necklacing" (carried out by forcing a rubber tire filled with petrol, around a victim's chest and arms, and setting it on fire):



His good friend, Ken Oosterbroek, also photographer apart of the same group (Bang-Bang club), which explosed the brutality in south africa, was killed taking photo's, which also led to Kevin's suicide. In his suicide note (three months after taking the vulture picture):

I am haunted by the vivid memories of killings and corpses and anger and pain ... of starving or wounded children, of trigger-happy madmen, often police, of killer executioners...I have gone to join Ken if I am that lucky.​

He took these pictures for a good cause, not for fame and profit.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
He was there during a food drop. There was a famine. he hitched a ride on a plane which stopped there for only 30 minutes to give out food.

While mothers and fathers were receiving the food from the plane, the children were by themselves. The photographer, kevin carter, saw this suffering child with a vulture behind it. He took the picture then chased the vulture away.

Minutes later, after the food had been passed out, he got on the plane and left.

He was a good man. He spent his life risking his own safety taking pictures of horrible things, to expose them to the world. Mostly his work was regarding the brutality of apartheid in south africa, such as this picture, a public execution by "necklacing" (carried out by forcing a rubber tire filled with petrol, around a victim's chest and arms, and setting it on fire):



His good friend, Ken Oosterbroek, also photographer apart of the same group (Bang-Bang club), which explosed the brutality in south africa, was killed taking photo's, which also led to Kevin's suicide. In his suicide note (three months after taking the vulture picture):

I am haunted by the vivid memories of killings and corpses and anger and pain ... of starving or wounded children, of trigger-happy madmen, often police, of killer executioners...I have gone to join Ken if I am that lucky.​

He took these pictures for a good cause, not for fame and profit.
he got paid, he won awards, he was there for that purpose. if there were no awards or money in the photographs he wouldnt have been doing it.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
he got paid, he won awards, he was there for that purpose. if there were no awards or money in the photographs he wouldnt have been doing it.
Man, he had no idea he was going to win an award for that picture. If you read what I wrote it was complete random chance he even arrived at that place to take the photo, as he hitched a ride on the plane.

The pictures were dispersed and the New York Times printed the vulture picture. he won an award for it yes, but he died a broke man.

The group he was apart of, Bang-Bang Club, was dedicated to expose what was going on in South Africa. They risked their lives, and as I mentioned two people were killed as a result. They did this because they believed in what they were doing, not for fame and fortune, clearly.

This wasn't a guy taking pictures of buildings or swimsuit models or rappers, etc, this was a guy putting himself in the worst environments in the world and putting his life on the line.

This is a very noble cause. How can you not see that? Risking your life to show the world whats going on.
 
May 14, 2002
6,278
6,950
0
42
and im not saying anything he would have done would have changed the future for this girl, but at the same time he was within capacity to help AT THAT MOMENT..even if he would have did it after he shot the picture, a little help for a girl who never had any would have been nice way to go out even if for 5 minutes.

so its ok for this guy to win a pulitzer and gain noteriety since he know he was just doing a job, even though human instict,ethics, etc... could have easily been extended after his "money shot".
Well, props be to you for donating clothes and money.
But you know just as well as I do that there are tons of people out there and on this board for that matter who point fingers at other people, while they should be looking in the mirror instead.

What could that guy have done at the moment besides taking that photo?
He couldn't do little more then chase the vulture away.
If he gave the child food or water.. it was only to postpone it's death for maybe a day or so..
And what about all the other people who are not in the photo? Should he have saved them all?
You know damn well the problem is much bigger then that.
The guy who took the photo couldn't do anything to save anyone at that moment.
What he did is take that photo for people like us to see, so we get an idea of what is going on there.
So people realize how serious the situation is there, so people will start to donate money, clothes or take up a foster parents plan.
So people spark up conversations, to create awareness, even years after the photo was shot.
So future children can be saved from the same conditions this child is in.

I seriously cannot grasp the idea any of you put the blame with the photographer.
The situation would have happened anyway, regardless if he where there or not. But now a lot of people are aware of how bad it is over there so now it is up to yourself to decide to do something about it. Stop putting the blame in other mans shoes.

I'll bet most people who scolded this photographer for not saving this kid will empty half their dinner plate in the trashcan tonight just as easy because they either made too much or they don't like it...
 

Ghost Dance

America's Nightmare
Nov 1, 2007
3,426
4,640
113
40
Oak Park...916
Man, he had no idea he was going to win an award for that picture. If you read what I wrote it was complete random chance he even arrived at that place to take the photo, as he hitched a ride on the plane.

The pictures were dispersed and the New York Times printed the vulture picture. he won an award for it yes, but he died a broke man.

The group he was apart of, Bang-Bang Club, was dedicated to expose what was going on in South Africa. They risked their lives, and as I mentioned two people were killed as a result. They did this because they believed in what they were doing, not for fame and fortune, clearly.

This wasn't a guy taking pictures of buildings or swimsuit models or rappers, etc, this was a guy putting himself in the worst environments in the world and putting his life on the line.

This is a very noble cause. How can you not see that? Risking your life to show the world whats going on.
I retract my statement from my earlier post.