That's scarry

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#42
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/11/01/palin/

Nov. 1, 2008 | YORK, Pa. -- On Halloween in central Pennsylvania, fear wasn't just in the air, it was along the highway. "A vote for Obama is a vote for Socialism," read a big sign alongside Route 22, about 18 miles outside of York, Pa., where Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin was making a stop on Friday afternoon.

After her monster rally in Williamsport, Pa., on Thursday evening, Palin spent All Hallow's Eve on a mini bus tour of the Keystone State, another expenditure of valuable pre-election days that suggests that Palin is convinced they can steal the state from the Democrats. On Friday, Palin spoke before a crowd that had started lining up at 11 a.m. at the York Expo Center to hear Palin scare the bejesus out of them. Though definitely not the Jesus.

Former Gov. Tom Ridge, who recently stated the obvious, that "the dynamics would be different in Pennsylvania" if he'd been tapped as McCain's running mate instead of Palin, had the task of introducing the Alaska governor to about 4,000 of her rabid fans, many of them sporting "Joe" stickers meant to bolster John McCain's recent assertions that we -- or they -- "are all Joe the Plumber." Sarah and Todd Palin, along with youngest daughter Piper (dressed for Halloween as a snow princess), took the stage to Michael Jackson's "Thriller."

And according to the stump speech Palin's been giving all over Pennsylvania, under a Barack Obama administration, no one's gonna save you from the beast about to strike. "Our opponents can fill a stadium, but they can't keep you safe," she said inside, while outside, supporters answered questions about what kept them up at night. Their answers spoke volumes about the terrorizing effects of the McCain-Palin ticket's relentless drive across this state. Supporters of the Republican candidate for president believe they are looking down the barrel of a gun loaded by Karl Marx, held by Barack Obama. The McCain-Palin fear-mongering tour is exposing -- or exploiting -- unrest and anxiety wherever it goes.

One of the many things that had 84-year-old World War II veteran John H. Gay on edge was worry for Sarah Palin's safety. "She's a brave woman, an old-fashioned American woman who's not afraid to have kids," said Gay. "She's one of the bravest women around, and someone might just assassinate her." But he was tormented by images of a fantastical Stalinoid world to come. According to Gay, Obama believes the communist "mantra" "from each according to his abilities, and to each according to his needs"; that "if we go the socialist way, you young people will lose all your freedoms -- mentally, physically and religiously." As he envisioned a possible future under Obama, he spoke of scarce hot water and hulking Soviet-era high-rises of the sort that ring Moscow.

And he was not alone in his concern that if the Democrats win on Tuesday, it'll only be a matter of time before Americans are getting in bread lines. "I'm afraid of the slippery slope to socialism," said 51-year-old Mike Brecht, whose 21-year-old son is fighting in Mosul, Iraq, and was adopted from Russia when he was 7. Brecht claims that his son, who was 2 when the Berlin Wall fell, still remembers life behind the Iron Curtain. "He can tell you all about his one turnip a day that he ate," said Brecht of his son. "Everybody got the same turnip."

"The other candidate scares me to death," said 65-year-old highway safety consultant Rob Mott, who had pasted his "Joe" sticker over a World's Best Grandpa sweatshirt, rendering him "Joe the Grandpa." What scared Mott about Obama is that "we just don't know him ... who he associated with over many years, his background, just hasn't been explored by the media or anyone else. It's four days away. We ought to know about him by now." But what about all the press over Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers? "I don't think he's been truthful and upfront," said Mott.

"We might end up with a socialist government in office and if that happens, it might be hard to get it out," said Candice Ward, a 23-year-old Miss Kent County from Delaware. "We have a democracy right now and it's no time to lose it." Ward was wearing her tiara, and had come to support Palin, a fellow beauty pageant contestant. "She placed second runner-up in Miss Alaska, and I was third runner-up in Miss Delaware."

Some Republican ticket supporters have been frightened by the prospect of one-party rule, a late addition to the McCain-Palin attack-arsenal. "I am afraid of the far-left agenda being put forth by a far-left senate, Congress and administration," said Jean Smith, of Dover, Pa., a 49-year-old who said she'd come to Friday's rally because she'd never been to a political gathering before and wanted to do it before she turned 50.

But the Smiths, like many of the religious Republicans who have become the boiled-down foundation of a Sarah Palin-led conservative base, were comforted even in their fear by their faith. "The first thing we do is pray for our leaders," said Smith, when asked what she would do if Obama became president. "Regardless of whether they're right, left, middle, whatever. God is the god who raises up leaders and changes hearts and he is really in control ultimately."

That's exactly what Galen Cook, a 36-year-old quality inspector from Tyco, thought too. He was at the rally to drop off his résumé with Palin -- he hopes to work in Republican government someday -- but when asked what he would do should the Democrats prevail on Tuesday, he replied, "The Lord's in control."

Retired Red Cross volunteers Ed Athoff and his wife, Barbara, 66 and 71, respectively, were coming to grips with the looming possibility of defeat in much the same fashion. Barbara, a huge Palin fan, said that "any woman who can manage a state, five children, and the housework, can manage a country." And Ed called Barack Obama "scary, from the word go. I think he's going to take this country in the totally wrong direction." Both Athoffs agreed that that direction was wrong on economic and moral grounds, "especially morally," said Ed, citing abortion and gay rights as their major disappointments with Obama.

But if Obama and Biden should be elected, Ed emphasized, "We both believe that it's all God's plan. And sometimes I believe that God allows us as humans to stumble and fall."
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#43
WTF is she talking about?
http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/coyne08/coyne08_index.html

SWATTING ATTACKS ON FRUIT FLIES AND SCIENCE [10.31.08]
By Jerry Coyne

Sarah Palin's criticism of the critters is just bad buzz. Research on them offers insights into learning, genes, diseases.

JERRY COYNE is a professor in the department of ecology and evolution at the University of Chicago, where he works on diverse areas of evolutionary genetics. He is the author (with H. Allen Orr) of Speciation, and Why Evolution Is True.

SWATTING ATTACKS ON FRUIT FLIES AND SCIENCE

Enough already. I bit my tongue when I heard that Sarah Palin believed that dinosaurs and humans once lived side by side and that she and John McCain wanted creationism taught in the public schools.

And I just shook my head when McCain derided proposed funding for a sophisticated planetarium projection machine as wasteful spending on an "overhead projector."

But the Republican ticket's war on science has finally gone too far. Last week, Sarah Palin dissed research on fruit flies.

In her usual faux-folksy style, Palin lit out after a congressional earmark involving these insects: "You've heard about some of these pet projects — they really don't make a whole lot of sense — and sometimes these dollars go to projects that have little or nothing to do with the public good. Things like fruit-fly research in Paris, France. I kid you not." (Reading this diatribe is not sufficient; only video reveals the scorn and condescension dripping from her words.)

As a geneticist, I've worked on fruit flies in the laboratory for three decades. I know the fruit fly. The fruit fly is a friend of mine. And believe me, Sarah Palin doesn't know anything about fruit flies.

The research Palin attacked was a perfectly valid project designed to protect American growers from the olive fruit fly, a destructive pest. But fruit-fly research is good for far more than that.

The fruit fly is what we call a "model organism." Since all animals partake of a common evolutionary history, we share basic features of physiology, development and biochemistry. And because flies are easy to study, quick to breed in the lab, and cheaper than chimps and mice, we can often use them as models for things that go wrong (or right) in our own species.

For example, most of what we know about how genes are passed on in humans came from breeding studies of fruit flies — work for which T.H. Morgan won a Nobel Prize in 1933. (This included work on the effects of abnormal numbers of chromosomes, the cause of Down syndrome.) Since then, three other Nobel Prizes in medicine or physiology have gone for research on fruit flies. This work has given insights into how bodies are built and how learning might occur.

The flies are models for disease, too, producing possibilities for curing epilepsy, Alzheimer's and, yes, one of Palin's favorite causes, autism.

Why are the Republican candidates so contemptuous of science? I suppose it's part of their general attack on "elitism," which has been surprisingly effective. We white-coated nerds in our labs, fooling around with flies at taxpayer expense, are easy targets.

But America can't afford cheap shots at science, because a lot of basic research has immense implications for human welfare — even if ignorant politicians can make it sound silly. Work on fruit flies is just one example.

This year's Republican campaign has consistently attacked the values of reason and logic that undergird our democracy. If anything has led to America's high standard of living and world preeminence, it's the idea that we can advance only with the best science possible.

When Palin declares that we don't have to know what causes global warming in order to fix it, she's not only exposing herself as a scientific illiterate; she's going against two centuries of American progress in technology, medicine and science. Trying to bond with the American people by taking pride in your ignorance and making science the common enemy — now that's a bridge to nowhere.

[First published in The Philadelphia Inquirer, October 31, 2008]