Song bitrates...

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#1
Does anyone here notice a major difference between 320 and 256, or maybe 320 and 192?

Im wondering because I have a grip of 320k albums / songs and I could easily convert them and make room for alot more shit.
 

B-Buzz

lenbiasyayo
Oct 21, 2002
9,673
4,429
0
40
bhibago
last.fm
#4
I can tell the difference between a 128 thats ripped from a cd and a 128 thats just shit quality. But otherwise I never notice much. I have August Burns Red- Messengers and it's 320 and it's the loudest shit I have on my entire computer, so I guess that's the biggest difference I have.
 

BEAR

Sicc OG
Dec 15, 2007
2,034
0
0
#6
i used to get 192 until i decided to test the 320
i havent tried the 256 but there is a significant difference if you have a good sound system or headphones
i can tell with my 30 dollar sony

is vbr better than a 320 from a cd?
how can i convert wma or a cd to vbr mp3?
also, there is an option for "wma lossless" that i havent tried, anyone know how that is?
 
Aug 20, 2006
4,225
1,106
113
FLA
#7
i used to get 192 until i decided to test the 320
i havent tried the 256 but there is a significant difference if you have a good sound system or headphones
i can tell with my 30 dollar sony

is vbr better than a 320 from a cd?
how can i convert wma or a cd to vbr mp3?
also, there is an option for "wma lossless" that i havent tried, anyone know how that is?
i never heard of wma lossless, but lossless is usually not or only slightly compressed and the format is wav or flac or aiff. and is about 1mb a minute files (ex. 70 minute cd=700mb)
and yes i dont know if youve realized, but some songs dont sound that great at 192kbps and other songs sound perfect in 192, but VBR makes all the songs sound CD quality unless its a crappy rip (smh at RAGE and their low bitrates)......and you can make a VBR with EAC and LAME.
 

Psilo707

Complete O.G.
Jun 25, 2002
7,423
62
48
40
Gimcheon, South Korea
www.seoulhunter.com
#9
I have a 1 terrabyte of hard drive space free, and not even I mess with flacs, haha. They are simply too big.. 30 megabytes for a 4-5 minute song... times 89,000 songs or so.. there goes my entire 1 TB of space :(

Yeah they do sound the best, but still, the human ear cant tell the diff between 192 kpbs and 320 kpbs unless the music is being played on a huuuuge sound system. theres a lot of audiophile elitists that will disagree with that but the research clearly backs that up.

I got FLAC's for my favorite groups though.
 

BEAR

Sicc OG
Dec 15, 2007
2,034
0
0
#10
i usually rip a cd on windows media player at 320 kbps mp3 for compatibilities sake
i definitely dont have the space to fuck with the lossless
i guess ill stick with mp3 but ill try variable out
thanks pyro
 

Defy

Cannabis Connoisseur
Jan 23, 2006
24,139
16,657
0
45
Rich City
#15
sound check works better than nothing, but it still be having random ass volumes sometimes.....I refuse to do anything below 192 kbps unless I'm doing ringtones