So Much For The American Dream of Homeownership

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 21, 2004
465
0
0
#23
that's funny i thought the governemtn has already been taking private property from home owners...how is it any different when highways are made in the first place once they decide to build one or take away private farming to build residential areas or cheaply buying out home owners to build stripmalls that later increase in property value....

do any of you want to work on a plan in restoring power to the people or is bitching all that we do here?
 
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
42
#25
Merciedez said:
that's funny i thought the governemtn has already been taking private property from home owners...how is it any different when highways are made in the first place once they decide to build one or take away private farming to build residential areas or cheaply buying out home owners to build stripmalls that later increase in property value....

do any of you want to work on a plan in restoring power to the people or is bitching all that we do here?

It is completely different in that 1) buying property from landowners (eminent domain) has usually been for the purposes of a public work of improvement such as building a freeway or other community improvement and 2) the beneficiary now will be the municipality and business, which are money driven, not the landowners.

I'm all for doing work for the people, but I have yet to see any clearly thought out plan for a greater scale of good from anyone in this board, including you, so I do volunteer work in my own community instead.
 
Oct 14, 2004
2,782
0
0
45
#26
Grab your gun and learn how to aim it. The government is going to learn one way or the other. We out number them. If we unify revolution is at hand. Think about it whites, blacks, asians, indians, hispanics all at the white house with laser scopes aimed. Fuck the government if they try to take properity I live on its going to be on. FUCK THE GOVERNMENT.
 
Aug 31, 2003
5,551
3,189
113
www.ebay.com
#27
This happened a while ago down here. They wanted to build a monster hotel and had cops and all kinds of shit go to the peoples houses. it technically wasn't forced but they sure did a good job making it seem forced. all but 3 people moved out and they were right in the middle of the neighborhood. i thought that was pretty damn funny .. they paid all that money to bulldoze the other houses and couldn't build their hotel.


they're going to have to carry me out of my house to take it ..
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#29
2-0-Sixx said:
LMAO@Liberal judges!

Scalia and Thomas voted against and they are uberconservatives, while the “liberal” judges voted for it. Lmao@liberal judges! They are about as liberal as the last Pope.
for you anything short of all out communism is considerd "far right" take the tunnel vision glasses off. it is well known that there are 3 conservative judges on the supreme court, 1 moderate conservative and 5 liberals.



TOKZTLI said:
It seems to me, the republicans are already getting what they want: business/government happy decrees by the Supreme Court.
republican usually side with business (they voted against big business here)
liberals usually side with government (big government)

and this ruling gives the GOVERNMENT the right to take PRIVATE LAND and give it to other PRIVATE OWNERS so they can collect more taxes, which means they can grow the governemnt and waste more.


TOKZTLI said:
Do they really need to stack the deck further?
how is 3/9 stacking the deck??? plus the first judge to go is Renquist, which means even if the get another "ultra conservative" they still only have 3 on the court out of 9.

the other one rumored to retire soon is sandra day oconnor, who is a moderate conservative and usually votes with the other conservatives? so at the end of the day the liberals still win out 5-4 or 6-3


TOKZTLI said:
How do you feel about Liberal judges making your conservative fantasies come true?
they didnt. this ruling is stupid.

personally i think supreme court judges should have term limits (say 15 years and you are gone).

what happened to Super Liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg, former head of the ACLU, why did she vote against citizens right to own their own home???
 
Sep 28, 2002
1,124
4
0
#30
Liberal and Conservative are bullshit titles that idiots rally around to try and make themselves feel like they matter in a system that excludes their opinion.

If you use these terms as a devisive device you are infact the culpret for the current polar athmosphere in a country where you dont even count. So why even fool yourself just admit your a pawn and obey your respective task masters.
 
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
42
#31
Mcleanhatch said:
. . . what happened to Super Liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg, former head of the ACLU, why did she vote against citizens right to own their own home???
You see, they dont follow labels like "super liberal" or "ultra-conservative" at all, this is a great example of it. To politicize the judiciary is fruitless. Next time you hear a politician doing it, sock him in the mouth, he's just show-boating for your vote and cant deliver on his promises or his demogagery.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#32
Formaldehyde Rx said:
Liberal and Conservative are bullshit titles that idiots rally around to try and make themselves feel like they matter in a system that excludes their opinion.

If you use these terms as a devisive device you are infact the culpret for the current polar athmosphere in a country where you dont even count. So why even fool yourself just admit your a pawn and obey your respective task masters.
:dead: :dead: :dead:
 

Cmoke

Sicc OG
May 10, 2002
3,391
4
38
40
#33
i will not give up my land without killing as many as i can and when i die the gov. will be like "that was easy" and take out the next "free" citizen

Buy a gun, Buy Many Guns.

prepare to defend yourself.

and do not give up your land. for ANYTHING