2-0-Sixx said:
LMAO@Liberal judges!
Scalia and Thomas voted against and they are uberconservatives, while the “liberal” judges voted for it. Lmao@liberal judges! They are about as liberal as the last Pope.
for you anything short of all out communism is considerd "far right" take the tunnel vision glasses off. it is well known that there are 3 conservative judges on the supreme court, 1 moderate conservative and 5 liberals.
TOKZTLI said:
It seems to me, the republicans are already getting what they want: business/government happy decrees by the Supreme Court.
republican usually side with business (they voted against big business here)
liberals usually side with government (big government)
and this ruling gives the GOVERNMENT the right to take PRIVATE LAND and give it to other PRIVATE OWNERS so they can
collect more taxes, which means they can grow the governemnt and waste more.
TOKZTLI said:
Do they really need to stack the deck further?
how is 3/9 stacking the deck??? plus the first judge to go is Renquist, which means even if the get another "ultra conservative" they still only have 3 on the court out of 9.
the other one rumored to retire soon is sandra day oconnor, who is a moderate conservative and usually votes with the other conservatives? so at the end of the day the liberals still win out 5-4 or 6-3
TOKZTLI said:
How do you feel about Liberal judges making your conservative fantasies come true?
they didnt. this ruling is stupid.
personally i think supreme court judges should have term limits (say 15 years and you are gone).
what happened to Super Liberal Ruth Bader Ginsburg, former head of the ACLU, why did she vote against citizens right to own their own home???