So how long has the Nobel prize for Peace been a joke?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#23
I don't think dropping cluster bombs in civilian areas, hospitals, schools, private homes, etc., and writing it off as "collateral damage" is justifiable, imo, but regardless, it's on big Al's resume and certainly does not display a peaceful man in anyway.
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#24
2-0-Sixx said:
they didn't invent the conflict but they did bomb the fuck out of them.
I remember that some bombs by "mistake" fell over some of the neighboring countries too...

It wasn't fun for the people who got their home destroyed

and they had nothing to do with the conflict
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#25
2-0-Sixx said:
I found this article insightful regarding Al Gore and the prize. I'll post a few sections of the article, followed by the link:

The awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to former Vice President Al Gore is a political statement by the European bourgeoisie about the policies of the Bush administration and the politics of the United States.

[...]

The political significance of Gore’s selection is clear, given that he is still an active figure in American politics, widely mentioned as a potential presidential candidate, who has on occasions attacked both the foreign and domestic policies of the Bush administration. At the very least, the award can be taken as a signal from the Norwegian political establishment—from which the selection committee is chosen—that it hopes for a Democratic victory in the 2008 presidential election.

[...]

Vice President Gore, however, is hardly to be identified with the cause of “peace.” One of only ten Senate Democrats who voted for the first US war against Iraq in 1990, he was second-in-command of an administration that dispatched US troops to Somalia, Haiti and Bosnia, financed death squads in Colombia, bombed Iraq, Afghanistan and Sudan, maintained an economic blockade of Iraq that caused the death of an estimated 500,000 Iraqi children, and waged a devastating air war against Serbia.

The Nobel Peace Prize has little in common with the similar prizes awarded to leading scientists and literary figures, whose recipients are being honored for an entire career, or a signal achievement, usually decades old, that has stood the test of time. Because of the worldwide prestige and visibility given the Peace Prize, the choosing of its recipient has become a major political event, signaling those issues, events or countries that are of greatest concern to the European ruling elite.

The method of selection, laid down in the will of the billionaire inventor of dynamite, Alfred Nobel, ensures that the award will be a political decision reflecting a broad consensus in the European bourgeoisie. While the other Nobel prize winners are selected by committees of experts in the various fields, such as the Swedish Academy of Science, the recipient of the peace prize is picked by a committee chosen by the Norwegian parliament, its five members selected on the basis of party strength in that legislative body.

[...]

Two concerns seem evident in the selection of Gore and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a UN organization, as the joint recipients of this year’s award: a determination to elevate the issue of climate change, and concern over signs of increasing political, social and economic instability in the United States.

Full Article
that's true

Does Al Gore deserve the prize for the AGW campaign?

Absolutely yes

Does he deserve it for his overall career? No


And out of the 6 Nobel prizes awarded each year, only the 3 scientific ones can be considered serious

The Pease prize is a political decision

The Literature prize is usually given to some obscure author that nobody reads and that will be forgotten in the future but is valued by the "critics"

The Economics prize is completely artificial as it was created in 1961 and if you think economists are real scientists or they contribute anything useful to mankind, you're seriously wrong
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#32
http://www.cshl.edu/public/releases/07_statement2.html

Media Contact:
Jim Bono, Director, Public Affairs
516-367-8455

October 18, 2007





Statement by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Board of Trustees and President Bruce Stillman, Ph.D. Regarding Dr. Watson’s Comments in The Sunday Times on October 14, 2007


Earlier this evening, the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Board of Trustees decided to suspend the administrative responsibilities of Chancellor James D. Watson, Ph.D., pending further deliberation by the Board.

This action follows the Board’s public statement yesterday disagreeing with the comments attributed to Dr. Watson in the October 14, 2007 edition of The Sunday Times U.K.