should we go back into Iraq??

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

should we go back to help?

  • yay

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • nay

    Votes: 28 100.0%

  • Total voters
    28

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
#41
should we go back? no
will we go back? yes. war is big business
Yet somehow our national deficit is racing at an alarming rate. Remember the good ol' days when war would create all of these domestic jobs and the economy would be booming because of it? Our economy is doing well but these wars aren't helping. We're coming up with new ways to waste an obscene amount of money.
 
Feb 2, 2006
6,400
3,294
113
#47
Tell the politicians to go to war


absolutely. if these fuckers like to go on tv everyday and war monger make the men in their family go to war. the warmongering script is always the same standard ranting speech. these multimillionaire scumbags like harry reid and john boehner should be forced to pay for the wars themselves. same goes for billionaires such as the corrupt nancy pelosi and that old hag diane fienstein. each time a war is waged more and more money gets stolen from the american taxpayer
 
Apr 25, 2002
4,692
2,577
113
44
Houston
#49
I thought part of the reason we tried to justify going in there was we were going to train their military, police, and other security forces so that they could maintain control over their own country and we wouldn't have to go back. I'm guessing we gave them some half-ass training so that we could put a check in the box, pretty much like the military always does.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#50
No shit Sherlock,.....but Iraq had more.

You dont quite understand how it all works.

There is no such thing as "more" in the sense of whats in the ground in certain conttries...its all about pricing and availability. There is actually "more" in Alaska and the Yukon than the middle east.

Again, this is about CONTROLLING more and using OTHERS oil, rather than your own. Why deplete your stash, when you can use/sell someone else's first?

theres actually tons of oil/fossil fuel that will still be pumped out in the future after all of our generations are dead.
Well, no. The idea behind fossil fuel is thats it is going to run out becuase a) we are using it at an astronomical level and b) there are no more "fossils". You do get how it works, right? Its not an endless supply. Not even close. And to think otherwise is extremely naive/stupid.

For someone who is so anti-government and the likes, you are are ignorant in some of these key talking points. You need to go brush up on a bunch of things and how they work. It will make for a better debate.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#53
You dont quite understand how it all works.

There is no such thing as "more" in the sense of whats in the ground in certain conttries...its all about pricing and availability. There is actually "more" in Alaska and the Yukon than the middle east.

Again, this is about CONTROLLING more and using OTHERS oil, rather than your own. Why deplete your stash, when you can use/sell someone else's first?



Well, no. The idea behind fossil fuel is thats it is going to run out becuase a) we are using it at an astronomical level and b) there are no more "fossils". You do get how it works, right? Its not an endless supply. Not even close. And to think otherwise is extremely naive/stupid.

For someone who is so anti-government and the likes, you are are ignorant in some of these key talking points. You need to go brush up on a bunch of things and how they work. It will make for a better debate.
The North is the new frontier. Russia claims half that shit, US/NATO no like.



Around 16,000 soldiers hailing from 16 nations ventured to Nordland, Norway on Wednesday to test their air, land and maritime mettle as part of the UN-approved ‘Cold Response’ training exercise. The purpose of the exercise is to train international troops unaccustomed to extreme weather and cold conditions to perform combat operations in icy temperatures in the case of a crisis situation.

 

Gas One

Moderator
May 24, 2006
39,741
12,147
113
45
Downtown, Pittsburg. Southeast Dago.
#54
You dont quite understand how it all works.

There is no such thing as "more" in the sense of whats in the ground in certain conttries...its all about pricing and availability. There is actually "more" in Alaska and the Yukon than the middle east.

Again, this is about CONTROLLING more and using OTHERS oil, rather than your own. Why deplete your stash, whhttp://www.siccness.net/vb/editpost.php?do=editpost&p=6201847en you can use/sell someone else's first?



Well, no. The idea behind fossil fuel is thats it is going to run out becuase a) we are using it at an astronomical level and b) there are no more "fossils". You do get how it works, right? Its not an endless supply. Not even close. And to think otherwise is extremely naive/stupid.

For someone who is so anti-government and the likes, you are are ignorant in some of these key talking points. You need to go brush up on a bunch of things and how they work. It will make for a better debate.
i hear theyre giving it about 36 more years to burn any fossil fuel before the global temp is increased by 2˚c (around 35-40 fahrenheit?) which is apparently a big ass deal. ive been hearing that its in place for no fossil fuels at all to burn after the year 2050 if we want to continue living on earth as we know it... :siccness::siccness:

fuckin imagine 140 degree summers...ill probably be dead before then but the next generation better pray we dont continue to fuck the earth up..not to sound like a global warming conspiracy theorist either but im hearing theres moves already in place to go towards cleaner power.
 
Last edited:

EVERgREENRIDER

ResidentRocketScientist
Dec 18, 2008
4,464
26,693
113
42
At the Pump
#55
Yet somehow our national deficit is racing at an alarming rate. Remember the good ol' days when war would create all of these domestic jobs and the economy would be booming because of it? Our economy is doing well but these wars aren't helping. We're coming up with new ways to waste an obscene amount of money.
Considering the last time that was the case was in the 40's, no, i dont remember diggidty