Will I have to pull out the "Bush over Kerry" posts? And supporting your country means defeating Bush..no doubt. If you want Terror to increase, corporate fraud to continue to go unchecked, the environment to be raped, pillaged, and destroyed, and the office of the presidency to be a sell-off to the highest bidder, by all means, vote Bush.
Am I? And Fox News has everything to do with this. Ever since they made the original "fair and balanced" claim, conservatives and idiots who listen to them all over have harped on ideological differences and delineations. "Well you're ultra-liberal so what you say means nothing." You watch Fox News. You listen to conservative radio. It has alot to do with it, actually. Among educated people interested in political science, never is the lame ass claim made of "ultra-partisanship"...that is a distinctly low-brow idea.
What is so interesting about that? What is so incredible about Michael Moore that he deserves his own documentary? Half of this doc., from what I've read, is lame-ass "uplifting" messages from "everyday Americans". "If we all pull together, we can do it." lmao. Like I need to hear soccer moms telling people to "just have faith." Fahrenheit 9/11 was funny at some points, but unprecedented in the fact that it was a major attack movie against a president, and it showed people a side to press and coverage that they hasn't seen before.
This documentary...uhh...it shows that uhh...Michael Moore has views that people disagree with. Why is that interesting? On one hand you have Dubya, and on the other Michael Moore. Who is a more worthy target/subject? Who is a better person to examine or spend time on? I support my country just as much as you or Mclean do. The difference is, I love it like a grown up. It does good things, and it does bad things. Most people who claim to support America support it like a 2-year old does a mommy. Anything mommy does is good, and anyone who might have something negative to say is bad. This is the kind of political "dialogue" we need to address in this country.
The proof is in the pudding. You refuse to state any of your "moderate" views anyways...all I hear from you is a naysaying voice when people attack Bush or conservatives...like when Mclean pointed out that we call Republican minorities an act of pandering and you said "Good point". Those are pretty much the only "good points" you see on this board, examples of conservatives being attacked "unfairly" or "liberal bias"...
Am I? And Fox News has everything to do with this. Ever since they made the original "fair and balanced" claim, conservatives and idiots who listen to them all over have harped on ideological differences and delineations. "Well you're ultra-liberal so what you say means nothing." You watch Fox News. You listen to conservative radio. It has alot to do with it, actually. Among educated people interested in political science, never is the lame ass claim made of "ultra-partisanship"...that is a distinctly low-brow idea.
What is so interesting about that? What is so incredible about Michael Moore that he deserves his own documentary? Half of this doc., from what I've read, is lame-ass "uplifting" messages from "everyday Americans". "If we all pull together, we can do it." lmao. Like I need to hear soccer moms telling people to "just have faith." Fahrenheit 9/11 was funny at some points, but unprecedented in the fact that it was a major attack movie against a president, and it showed people a side to press and coverage that they hasn't seen before.
This documentary...uhh...it shows that uhh...Michael Moore has views that people disagree with. Why is that interesting? On one hand you have Dubya, and on the other Michael Moore. Who is a more worthy target/subject? Who is a better person to examine or spend time on? I support my country just as much as you or Mclean do. The difference is, I love it like a grown up. It does good things, and it does bad things. Most people who claim to support America support it like a 2-year old does a mommy. Anything mommy does is good, and anyone who might have something negative to say is bad. This is the kind of political "dialogue" we need to address in this country.
The proof is in the pudding. You refuse to state any of your "moderate" views anyways...all I hear from you is a naysaying voice when people attack Bush or conservatives...like when Mclean pointed out that we call Republican minorities an act of pandering and you said "Good point". Those are pretty much the only "good points" you see on this board, examples of conservatives being attacked "unfairly" or "liberal bias"...
