Sagging pants, 'droopy drawers' to be illegal?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
Fines for 'droopy drawers' backed

US politicians fed up with catching an eyeful of underwear want to fine those who won't hitch up their trousers.
The Virginia state house has voted to outlaw the trend of wearing trousers so low that underwear hangs over the top.

Delegates said the habit, popular across the US and in other Western countries, was "coarsening" society.

But others hit back, urging legislators to remember their own "fashion follies" and saying the law would be used mostly against black people.

The house adopted the "droopy drawers" bill by a margin of 60-34.


If the state senate also approves, youngsters in Virginia showing too much of their boxer shorts or G-strings could be fined $50 (£26).

The habit, apparently picked up from rap and skateboarding culture, has become popular among boys and girls of all races, but particularly black youngsters.

Democrat Delegate Algie T Howell proposed the bill.

"It's not an attack on baggy pants. It's not about Janet Jackson. It's not about Randy Moss," he said, referring to the American footballer recently fined for pretending to "moon" opposing fans.

"To vote for this bill would be a vote for character, to uplift your community and to do something good not only for the state of Virginia, but for this entire country," he added.

Faux pas

Others were similarly offended by the current trend.

"Most of us would identify this as the coarsening of society," said Delegate John Reid, a Republican.

"Underwear is called underwear for a reason."

But Delegate Lionell Spruill, a Democrat, objected, calling it "a foolish bill".

He asked fellow politicians to remember their own former fashion faux pas, including Afro haircuts, platform shoes and shiny polyester "shell suits".

"Please, let these kids express themselves," he urged, before warning there could be a sinister side to the bill.

"This is going to be a bill that targets blacks. You know who they are going to stop," he said.
 

Sydal

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
42
www.idealsentertainment.com
#5
Do we not have freedom of expression in this country? That's one of the MOST ridiculous things I've ever heard. They can't say it's indecent exposure, cause no ass and no crotch is showing...so how are they going to pass that without going against our constitutional rights? There's no dress code in this country!!
 
May 16, 2002
1,605
9
38
43
#10
one would think that there are far better laws to come up with than "pant sagging is illegal" imagine goin to court over this one
 
Apr 25, 2002
3,461
542
0
49
#13
MAY BE WEIRD BUT I AGREE WITH THIS IF IT BECOMES LAW...ITS BASICALLY INDECENT EXPOSURE...IF YOU WALK THE STREET IN YOUR DRAWERS YOU CAN BE ARRESTED....THERE ISNT MUCH DIFFERENCE....BUT IT SHOULD ONLY BE ILLEGAL FOR GUYS AND FAT CHICKS....
 
Jun 27, 2002
14,470
135
63
#16
AIIGHT SO WOULD WOMEN BE PROSECUTED FOR THONGS AS WELL....WHAT ABOUT OLD PEOPLE THAT WEAR THEIR PANTS UP TO THEIR NIPPLES...?...WE SHOULDNT HAVE TO BE EXPOSED TO THEIR SOCKS....

WHAT ABOUT CLEAVAGE...SHOULD WE SET CLEAVAGE GUIDLINES FOR THE U.S....NO MORE THEN 2 INCHES VIEWABLE CLEAVAGE ?

DAMN IF THIS GET PAST THE BAY IS GOIN TO FALL LIKE ITS PANTS.....
 
Aug 5, 2003
2,607
0
0
42
www.myspace.com
#18
mustynutz said:
AIIGHT SO WOULD WOMEN BE PROSECUTED FOR THONGS AS WELL....WHAT ABOUT OLD PEOPLE THAT WEAR THEIR PANTS UP TO THEIR NIPPLES...?...WE SHOULDNT HAVE TO BE EXPOSED TO THEIR SOCKS....

^^^^ LMAO !!!!!!!! MAN FOR REAL THOUGH I BE SAGGIN' LIKE A DUMB FOOL SOMETIMES, BUT I GOT HELLA LONG ASS SHIRTS THAT HANG DOWN PAST MY ASS, SO CAN THEY STILL FUCK WITH ME OR AM I CLEAN ??