Ron Paul's incendiary past revealed by Wisconsin Historical Society

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#21
It was in his news letter! Who has a news letter to print shit that they don't support?

If I had the ColdBlooded weekly that I sent out it wouldn't include articles speaking highly of KKK members, etc. But that's cuz I'm not racist and don't support the KKK. Ron Paul on the other hand . . .
 
Nov 10, 2006
2,124
2
0
48
#22
The educated people I spoke with this is supposed to offend say this is BS similar to accusing someone of molesting a child to get them arrested the day before an election; and the unethical will promote the lie even when they know it to be, but this time around everyone who tries to play that BS will be branded the little boy who cried wolf with a permanent brand.
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#23
Nah, it is more like letting someone molest a child in your home with your concent, but then when you get busted out on it saying "I just own the house! Just because I knew he was going to molest kids and I said he would use my house to do it doesn't mean I think it is ok for people to molest kids!"
 
Aug 1, 2004
392
0
0
#25
Nah, it is more like letting someone molest a child in your home with your concent, but then when you get busted out on it saying "I just own the house! Just because I knew he was going to molest kids and I said he would use my house to do it doesn't mean I think it is ok for people to molest kids!"
Not exactly......your infering that Dr. Paul knew ahead of time that racist shit would be printed in a news letter baring his name and then said it wasnt his fault.

In reality he took moral resposibility by saying that he should have paid closer attension to what was being printed, which is a respectable thing to do because you know any other politician would have tried to weasle thier way out of it.

Heres the link to the leader of the NAACP in Austin (a black man), who has know Dr. Paul for over 20 years stating that he has never heard Paul use any such language or shown any racist tendencies....

http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...12&start=50&num=10&so=1&type=search&plindex=1
 

mouth_my_nuts

🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻
Feb 16, 2006
4,988
11,885
113
#26
Someone who post's regularly in the GOM was talking about Ron Paul and this exact newsletter along time ago in here, WD maybe?...somebody was saying that they would never vote for Ron Paul because of basically everything that was mentioned in cold blooded's first post
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#27
Even if he isn't racist or in support of the KKK, etc . . . you guys are still saying you support a candidate who is dumb enough to put his name on that shit and not pay close enough attention to what was being printed and distributed under his name. He put the Ron Paul stamp of approval on that shit. Like he's Krusty the Klown sellin fire hazard toys to kids.

And since when is the NAACP the litmus test for racism?
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#28
Even if he isn't racist or in support of the KKK, etc . . . you guys are still saying you support a candidate who is dumb enough to put his name on that shit and not pay close enough attention to what was being printed and distributed under his name. He put the Ron Paul stamp of approval on that shit. Like he's Krusty the Klown sellin fire hazard toys to kids.

And since when is the NAACP the litmus test for racism?

LOL, since 1992 man.

Maybe since the NAACP and Al Sharpton/Jesse Jackson will call you racist if you sneeze wrong.

Having the support of a leader from the NAACP is obviously NOT indisputable proof that RP is in fact not racist, and no one said it was the definitive litmus test, but it is a pretty solid testament nonetheless. It deserves mentioning without a doubt.

Plus what was the guy suppose to do, get the Republican Party to give him the PC Seal of Approval?

On the other hand, suppose that RP actually did know about what was being published, and even supported it at the time. Why could he have not seen the error of his ways over the last 20 years and changed his opinion. I know I sure don't feel the same way about many issues that I did 20 years ago lol.
 
Nov 10, 2006
2,124
2
0
48
#29
Racism is simply and ugly form of collectivism, the mindset that views humans strictly
as members of groups rather than individuals...By encouraging Americans to adopt
a group mentality, the advocates of so-called diversity actually perpetuate racism. Their obsession with racial group identity is inherently racist...We should understand that racism
will endure until we stop thinking in terms of groups and begin thinking in terms of individual liberty
Ron Paul April 18 2007
I guess when he referred to MLK and Gandhi as heroes that's some kind of secret racist code.

we should conduct a little experiment and go through the siccness and see if any of the above mentioned is practiced in any way throughout the forums
 
Nov 21, 2005
5,793
5
0
42
www.revver.com
#30
So what? You must have a lot of hate in you, to constantly hate on the man.

He is the only one beside.. Kucinich and Gravel. .who give a damm about freedom in this country... and all you can do it try to digg up dirt on him?

So what Hillary is a one world government supporter.. She attended the Bilderberg Group Meeting, and She is even on a video clip praising world government.

Mitt Romney is an aristocrat.. so he is not only rascist.. but he thinks he's better than everyone else..

Are you still mad Fred Thompson.. is out of the race.. Ron Paul is doing so much better than him...

Keep hating.... you must love tyranny Cold Blooded
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#31
Are you still mad Fred Thompson.. is out of the race.. Ron Paul is doing so much better than him...
More proof you have no clue as to what you are talking about:


Candidate Delegates
Rudy Giuliani 1
Mike Huckabee 21
Duncan Hunter 1
John McCain 19
Ron Paul 2
Mitt Romney 42
Fred Thompson 6
Total 92

Thompson got a larger percentage of the primary voters in N.H. than Ron Paul AND he has more delegates so far than Ron Paul.

In SC he will trounce Ron Paul.