I can only speak from experience. I've driven late at night and separating both lanes of traffic is this big median or whatever it's called with trees and bushes. Anyway, some lady was standing in the median, but behind the tree because I didn't see her, till she jumped out into the street and started running and I almost hit her.
I've seen people run through traffic and almost cause an accident because they were trying to catch the buss.
I've seen people with 8 kids trailing behind them walking through major streets like they were walking in their living rooms and just expect people to stop for them.
If that's the way it is now, with jaywalking laws, how would it be without them?
I've seen people run through traffic and almost cause an accident because they were trying to catch the buss.
I've seen people with 8 kids trailing behind them walking through major streets like they were walking in their living rooms and just expect people to stop for them.
If that's the way it is now, with jaywalking laws, how would it be without them?
If someone wants to risk running across the street, who am I (or you) to tell them they can't?
Should swimming pools be illegal? Why not, backyard swimming pools are SIGNIFICANTLY more dangerous to children than firearms, yet people push for controlling weapons based on their perceived threat, in particular to children. You can be punished for not locking a hand gun properly if a child gains access to it, you cannot be punished for not modifying a pool so a child cannot drown in it.
Should owning small uncaged pets be illegal? Why not, more injuries are caused by people tripping over pets than are caused by pet attacks, yet owning some pets is illegal because of the "danger" they pose to people. However the data clearly shows that regular pets actually pose a greater threat.
You can't make the argument that such and such should be illegal because it has been proven to be dangerous, and then subsequently not make the same argument for something else that is even more dangerous than what is illegal.
There is no consistency in these arguments. Again the deterrent should be in the consequences, the decision should be up to the individual.