Religilous

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Mac Jesus

Girls send me your nudes
May 31, 2003
10,752
54,027
113
40
#3
It's Bill Maher's new documentary about how ridiculous religion can be.



It looks like it could be pretty funny. I saw him the other day on the daily show explaining it.
 
Feb 8, 2006
3,435
6,143
113
#8
I think anyone who judges someone whether it be a religious person or not is in the wrong. Everyone has faults and is a screw up. Believing in Jesus is not an excuse to ignore your own faults, its not a golden ticket also.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#11
I thought bill maher was an atheist.
Nah he's gone on record and said he isn't.

lol, does he believe in the dark side as well?
LOL! Shit if he does he probably can use Choke Force.


GTS said:

I think anyone who judges someone whether it be a religious person or not is in the wrong. Everyone has faults and is a screw up. Believing in Jesus is not an excuse to ignore your own faults, its not a golden ticket also.
Agreed.
 
Aug 6, 2008
10,132
195
0
39
#17
yeah he said he preaches "i dont know"

that was a good ass movie tho, amazing how many idiots there are out there, he didnt even get any really good arguments
 
Mar 9, 2005
1,345
1
0
44
#18
yeah he said he preaches "i dont know"

Ditto, I think agnosticism is the most appropriate stance. I strongly doubt that God exists, but being positive that he doesn't is almost as bad as being positive that he does. I'm happy to remain agnostic, leaving open the possibility that he may exist, but suggesting that the probability of him existing is less than winning the lottery 5 times in a row.

Looking forward to this movie, although richard dawkins, sam harris, pen and teller (to name a few) have already beat down on theists enough, proving the point that religion is ridiculous.
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#19
Ditto, I think agnosticism is the most appropriate stance. I strongly doubt that God exists, but being positive that he doesn't is almost as bad as being positive that he does. I'm happy to remain agnostic, leaving open the possibility that he may exist, but suggesting that the probability of him existing is less than winning the lottery 5 times in a row.


Well said.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#20
Ditto, I think agnosticism is the most appropriate stance. I strongly doubt that God exists, but being positive that he doesn't is almost as bad as being positive that he does. I'm happy to remain agnostic, leaving open the possibility that he may exist, but suggesting that the probability of him existing is less than winning the lottery 5 times in a row.
Strong atheism is a term generally used to describe atheists who accept as true the proposition, "gods do not exist". Weak atheism, is simply the broader concept, "the absence of belief in any gods," someone who lacks theism and who does not happen to believe in the existence of any gods — no more, no less.