Redskins want Lance Briggs for #6 overall draft pick

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
By Len Pasquarelli
ESPN.com


PHOENIX -- While a proposal has yet to be formalized, the Washington Redskins will make a trade offer to the Chicago Bears aimed at acquiring two-time Pro Bowl weakside linebacker Lance Briggs, agent Drew Rosenhaus and two league sources told ESPN.com late Monday night.

Washington will propose a swap of first-round draft picks in this year's draft -- the Redskins own the sixth overall selection and Chicago has the 31st choice in the lottery -- in exchange for Briggs. The potential deal, which is expected to pick up steam on Tuesday morning as the annual NFL meetings continue here, would be contingent on the Redskins signing Briggs to a long-term contract.

Having failed last spring to consummate a long-term contract with Briggs -- reportedly a seven-year, $33 million deal on which both sides worked for several weeks before the negotiations collapsed-- the Bears employed the franchise tag last month to keep the four-year veteran off the open market.

Briggs, 26, told ESPN.com three weeks ago that he preferred to be traded or have Chicago rescind the franchise tag and make him a free agent rather than return to the Bears. He said he would "not play one more day" for the Bears. He subsequently told Fox Sports that he would sit out the entire 2007 season rather than play for Chicago under terms of the franchise marker.

On Monday afternoon, Briggs arrived at the resort hotel where NFL owners are meeting and met briefly with Bears general manager Jerry Angelo.

"It was good in the sense that we talked man-to-man," Briggs said. "But not much changed [during the meeting]. But it was good, a positive step, in that we both know where each other stands in this thing."

Subsequent to that meeting, Briggs spoke with representatives with a few teams, including the Redskins. The standout linebacker spoke with Washington owner Dan Snyder, coach Joe Gibbs and general manager Vinny Cerrato. At some point in the evening, the Washington brass determined to make a play for Briggs, and there were discussions with Rosenhaus about potential contract parameters.

Rosenhaus, who has struck several deals with Snyder, said later Monday that reaching a contract agreement with the Redskins was "a strong likelihood." But he also acknowledged that Washington still had to formalize a trade proposal and the Bears had to accept.

"But it's a win-win situation," Rosenhaus said. "Chicago only wants to sign Lance to a one-year contract anyway. If they made the trade, they would move up 25 spots in the first round and be able to choose one of the premier players in the draft. And Lance, obviously, would get the long-term deal he wants [from the Redskins]. It's a good resolution for everyone."

By using the franchise marker on Briggs, the Bears ostensibly made him a one-year qualifying offer worth $7.206 million. Briggs has the right to negotiate with any team and to sign an offer sheet. If the Bears decline to match the offer sheet, the team which signed Briggs would have to send Chicago a pair of first-round draft choices as compensation. But such compensation is considered prohibitive, and pretty much precludes an offer sheet.

The kind of trade the Redskins will propose makes more sense for all of the parties involved. There have been rumors for much of the offseason that the Redskins wanted to trade out of the No. 6 slot in the first round. And a deal for Briggs, one of the NFL's top young linebackers, would represent the kind of big splash Snyder likes to make. It would also allow Chicago to get value for Briggs and to rid itself of an unhappy player.

A former University of Arizona standout, Briggs was chosen by the Bears in the third round of the 2003 draft. He earned a starting job as a rookie, emerged by his third season as one of the NFL's top young weakside linebackers, and was chosen for the Pro Bowl in each of the past two seasons.

Even playing in the lengthy shadow of middle linebacker Brian Urlacher, with whom he has become close friends, Briggs is regarded leaguewide as a top defender and playmaker.

Len Pasquarelli is a senior NFL writer for ESPN.com
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#4
I think its probably a better deal for da bears. Redskins will be stuck paying this asshole hella money and there is no telling if he can really help their defense or not. What happened with Archuleta? Didn't they make him the highest paid Safety last year? How'd that turn out?

Snyder will pay just about anybody any insane amount of cash. But it just doesnt work out
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#5
Yeah, you've got a good point. I think the Bears got the better deal because they get to move up in the draft....
 
May 2, 2002
1,131
6
0
52
#6
Snyder loves to spend hella cash.

I like Briggs as much as Urlacher. I'd do this deal in a hearbeat if i were the Skins.
I thinks its a good deal for both teams especially considering Briggs' unhappiness.

The last 5 number 6 NFL draft picks aren't shit compared to Briggs.

06- Vernon Davis
05- Pac Man
04- Winslow
03- Johnathon Sullivan
02- Ryan Sims
 
May 18, 2005
187
3
0
#8
2-0-Sixx said:
Snyder is an idiot :dead:
I agree when you talk about success of a football team win/lose wise, however Snyder made more money off the Redskins then any franchise in sports history last year and thats fact (lil over a billion).

He wins with the constant buzz around the team, new star players, etc, but the fans lose.
 
May 18, 2005
187
3
0
#9
Solitary 1 said:
SOLID DEAL FOR BOTH TEAMS.
I think it would be a dumb move for the Skins for what they have to give up and nothing but positive for the Bears because the guy is done playing there and will sit out the year. He will become a unrestricted free agent next year, so the Bears get something out of it.

Skins shouldn't offer no more then a 3rd round...in 08 since they don't have one this year :(
 
Aug 9, 2006
6,298
56
48
36
#12
big D said:
Snyder loves to spend hella cash.

I like Briggs as much as Urlacher. I'd do this deal in a hearbeat if i were the Skins.
I thinks its a good deal for both teams especially considering Briggs' unhappiness.

The last 5 number 6 NFL draft picks aren't shit compared to Briggs.

06- Vernon Davis
05- Pac Man
04- Winslow
03- Johnathon Sullivan
02- Ryan Sims

pacman and veron are both solid....you cant compare players in diffrent postions....winslow is getting there....the other two hmmmm
 
Aug 9, 2006
6,298
56
48
36
#17
Jesse fuckin' Rice said:
Pacman is overrated as FUCK. I know he is young, but WOW does he get lost some times.

his numbers beg to differ......hes one of the best young corners in the leauge (i know you could say im biased).....our Defense cord is the worst in the leauge and pac is a bright spot on our d......hes not overrated......hes one of the better open field taclking corners i have EVER seen....the only time he looks "lost" is in zone and thats because of our poor safety play.....if any thing he is underated...we owe atleast 2 games of our winning record on him ALONE....and i mean alone alone....hes a beast and if you watched all the titans game this year you would know wasup.....
 
Aug 9, 2006
6,298
56
48
36
#18
KAH707KALI said:
^^^^id keep briggs over pacman that fool cant stay away from trouble who knows how long he is gonna be suspended for

thats his only knock but hes never been convicted of a crime.....i see him turning the corner after all this shit pans out (if it ever does)....i personally think hes innocent in the LV case (there trying to get money from him i think personally just like the case where supposebly pacman spit on a chick....which was thrown out and she tryed to sue him for 75,000....).....the georgia incident is up in the air......he will be suspended just because people are going to make a example out of him.......whether thats right or not is your own opinion
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#19
What about the money showers with strippers? Is that fake? What about those people that got shot, were they fake too?

Him not being convicted of a crime says nothing about him being innocent and everything about how our legal system works in our society ($$$). It's just odd too me that wherever he goes, problems follow. It doesn't take a genius to figure out the dude is a knucklehead.

You're not going to find too many people that hive like 8-9 charges brought against them all to be dropped or are still pending and that person is 100% innocent. No way. Wishful thinking comrade.

Talented player, no doubt, and I honestly kinda like the guy, I just think he is a stupid ass motherfucker.

If I'm a coach, GM, whatever, that's too risky for me. How many times have we seen talented ass players in the NFL go down the wrong path? Too many to list.
 
Aug 9, 2006
6,298
56
48
36
#20
2-0-Sixx said:
What about the money showers with strippers? Is that fake? What about those people that got shot, were they fake too?

Him not being convicted of a crime says nothing about him being innocent and everything about how our legal system works in our society ($$$). It's just odd too me that wherever he goes, problems follow. It doesn't take a genius to figure out the dude is a knucklehead.

You're not going to find too many people that hive like 8-9 charges brought against them all to be dropped or are still pending and that person is 100% innocent. No way. Wishful thinking comrade.

Talented player, no doubt, and I honestly kinda like the guy, I just think he is a stupid ass motherfucker.

i just find it hard to believe that pacman had something largely to do with it when they had him at the jail with video survalince over night......but after 500 hours of "investagation" they try to charge him? sounds like a whole lot of mouthing off (snitching) not saying THAT makes pacman innocent but pacman is allready guilty in the public's eye....thanks to the owner of the club....

im not saying pacman is a great person he may kick it with a lot of people but a lot of the shit he gets in troulbe for is bullshit....


i do believe he will be gone for the whole season most likely