RAIDERS AT MIAMI
- Thread starter WiCkEd
- Start date
Again Garner is coo, but hes not even a top 15 back! He aint doin shit that aint been done before! Now if u wanna talk about a premier back doin rushing and recieveing look at Holmes! He will atleast get 1,500 rushing, while still gettin 1,000 recieving! Thats what Im talkin bout homie!! Your team aint televised like tone said, and your team when on the road and televised is to borin to watch with those DAMN dink passes!! GOT EM!!!
1ST OFF, OUR LAST 4 GAMES HAVE BEEN TELEVISED!! AND SECOND, NAME 14 TIGHTER BACKS THEN GARNER!! I'LL SAY HOLMES IS BETTER, BUT HE AINT GONNA GET 1,000 RECEIVING!! AND FAULK, WILLIAMS, MCCALLISTER, AND TOMLINSON ARE BETTER, BUT AFTER THOSE 5 GARNER IS A PRETTY FUCKIN GOOD WEAPON!! U TELL ME, 1,OOO RUSHING AND RECEIVING, 5YRD A CARRY AVE. AND HE ALREADY GOT 75 CATCHES THAT 'S PRETTY DAMN GOOD AND HE IS 4TH IN THE NFL IN TOTAL YARDS!!!! STOP HATING AND LOOK AT THE NUMBERS!!! UR IGNORENCE IS KILLIN' ME!!
RAIDER NATION BITCHES!!!!!
RAIDER NATION BITCHES!!!!!
Ok I will show u my list and dont say Im hatin!! Just to prove that check it....tone get out of here with that Hearst & Barlow better than Garner, cause it aint happening!! Now here we go....thses backs are all better, and Im not just talkin numbers this, Im talkin bout overall!!
1. M. Faulk
2. P. Holmes
3. R. Williams
4. L. Tomlinson
5. D. McAllister
6. F. Taylor
7. A. Green
8. C. Dillon
9. S. Alexander
10. C. Martin
11. E. James
12. E. George
13. C. Portis
14. T. Henry
15. J. Lewis
Theres 15 right there..there may be a couple more, not sure, but that is in no peticular order, just names them as I thought of them!! But those whiner backs arent as good as Garner! But these are better backs period!! GOT EM!!!
1. M. Faulk
2. P. Holmes
3. R. Williams
4. L. Tomlinson
5. D. McAllister
6. F. Taylor
7. A. Green
8. C. Dillon
9. S. Alexander
10. C. Martin
11. E. James
12. E. George
13. C. Portis
14. T. Henry
15. J. Lewis
Theres 15 right there..there may be a couple more, not sure, but that is in no peticular order, just names them as I thought of them!! But those whiner backs arent as good as Garner! But these are better backs period!! GOT EM!!!
COME ON DOGG!! GEORGE AVERAGES LIKE 2 YARDS A FUCKIN CARRY!! AND F.TAYLOR PLAYS 2 GAMES A YEAR!! S. ALEXANDER ISN'T A STEADY PLAYER AND HALF THEM DUDES DONT CATCH NO PASSES!! I AINT TALKIN BOUT JUST RUNNING, I'M TALKIN ALL AROUND BACK!! BLOCKIN AND CATCHIN PLAYBOY AND GARNER IS IN THE TOP 10 EASY IN ALL AROUND BACKS!!
AND TONE THAT WAS THE FUNNIEST SHIT I EVER HEARD!! BARLOW AND HEARST COMBINED DONT HAVE AS MANY TOTAL YARDS AS CHARLIE!!!
RAIDER NATION!!!
AND TONE THAT WAS THE FUNNIEST SHIT I EVER HEARD!! BARLOW AND HEARST COMBINED DONT HAVE AS MANY TOTAL YARDS AS CHARLIE!!!
RAIDER NATION!!!
If u think Garner is better than Taylor, George or Alexander u are sadly mistaken!! U asked me to name u 15 backs better, well i did!! But if u dont agree thats on u!! I mean shit if these other backs teams just fuckin passed all game, then Im sure they would catch passes!! I mean be serious, these backs are hoggs that get 20 carries plus a game, but if catching passes is needed , then Im sure they could handle it!! But all these guys are more talented than Garner in my eyes, but call it what u want!! GOT EM!!!
Travis Henry is not a better back that Garner...sure, he is tearing it up...but does not have near the experience that garner has....but of course, i like both of them (UT)
...eddie george a few years ago..sure, he would have been better, but now battling with injuries, he is just a shadow of his former self
...eddie george a few years ago..sure, he would have been better, but now battling with injuries, he is just a shadow of his former self
What does experionce have to do with talent?? yes experience is good to get a better feel for the game, but if u rank backs based on what u claim, then Emmitt, Garner, Hearst, would be the best and we know that aint the case! I mean Emmitt used to be the best, but not because of experience! haha, anyway, all those backs have morre talent than Garner and are better to me!! But atleast u could only point out 2 that may not be better on my list!! So Im close!! GOT EM!!
i think it's more that when somebody thats young starts succeeding, i don't like to jump on them really quick and put them above others....to many players, especially running backs, have a problem with longevity.....hopefully henry will be good for a long time, b/c i really like him (UT) ....but next year, he might get hurt and be gone forever.......i dunno....i still think garner is better...but that's all good
Dogg any of these Backs could get hurt at anytime, but that dont make u not better then someone! What Im sayin is right now I think those backs I listed are better than garner! U notice I didnt put Emmitt on that list!! I am bein real, and Emmitt use to be better but not no more!! Thats what Im sayin!! GOT EM!!!
