R.I.P Ted Kennedy
- Thread starter coondogg26
- Start date
when did i ever say that the government pays for these things? Of course we the taxpayers pay for it. But its the government that facilitates it
All these "small government conservatives" talk a good game, but whenever they get in power, they grow the government like no ones business
all these dudes also want to get rid of social security and medicare
All these "small government conservatives" talk a good game, but whenever they get in power, they grow the government like no ones business
all these dudes also want to get rid of social security and medicare
NEVER MIND THE COST GAP BETWEEN WHAT WE PAY FOR MILITARY THAN WHAT WE PAY FOR WELFARE ,WHEN PEOPLE CALL IT WELFARE OR GOVERNMENT ASSITANCE PEOPLE WILL HAVE A DIFFRENT OPIONION ON THE ISSUE DEPENDING ON WHAT YOU'RE CALLING IT. THE AMOUNT OF OUR MONEY THAT GOES TO THOSE PROGARMS ARE LAUGHABLE COMPARED TO MILITARY SPENDING.
WE NEED MORE BOMBS THAT WAY MORE CHILDREN CAN DIE
WE NEED MORE BOMBS THAT WAY MORE CHILDREN CAN DIE
Poorly
http://www.hoisingtonmgt.com/pdf/HIM2009Q2NP.pdf
http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~cromer/RomerDraft307.pdf
In case you don't want to read those here is an excerpt;
"The most extensive research on tax
multipliers is found in a paper written at the
University of California Berkeley entitled The
Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates
Based on a new Measure of Fiscal Shocks, by
Christina D. and David H. Romer (March 2007).
(Christina Romer now chairs the president's
Council of Economic Advisors). This study found
that the tax multiplier is 3, meaning that each dollar
rise in taxes will reduce private spending by $3."
OK
Not being a small government conservative I could care less what they do. It takes a special person to be a politician. Am I surprised that "small government conservatives" don't do as they say once elected? Not at all. They are equally as destructive, corrupt, and incompetent as "big government liberals"
Good riddance.
Social Security is government forced retirement planning. The government doesn't think you are capable of managing your own life so they force you to do so. I fundamentally disagree with that ideology.
The government should not have the authority to force you to do anything. The function of the government is to protect your civil liberties from being violated by other people, not to violate them in and by itself.
http://www.hoisingtonmgt.com/pdf/HIM2009Q2NP.pdf
http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~cromer/RomerDraft307.pdf
In case you don't want to read those here is an excerpt;
"The most extensive research on tax
multipliers is found in a paper written at the
University of California Berkeley entitled The
Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates
Based on a new Measure of Fiscal Shocks, by
Christina D. and David H. Romer (March 2007).
(Christina Romer now chairs the president's
Council of Economic Advisors). This study found
that the tax multiplier is 3, meaning that each dollar
rise in taxes will reduce private spending by $3."
OK
Not being a small government conservative I could care less what they do. It takes a special person to be a politician. Am I surprised that "small government conservatives" don't do as they say once elected? Not at all. They are equally as destructive, corrupt, and incompetent as "big government liberals"
Good riddance.
Social Security is government forced retirement planning. The government doesn't think you are capable of managing your own life so they force you to do so. I fundamentally disagree with that ideology.
The government should not have the authority to force you to do anything. The function of the government is to protect your civil liberties from being violated by other people, not to violate them in and by itself.
