to get back to the original point of the thread, what exactly are the damages here? why is the priest not allowed to voice his opinion that dude is wrong in his conclusion that christ is fictional?
as far as the reality of it, i think most serious scholars that study biblical hiostory would say that there probably was someone, or possibly a bunch of somones that the literary figure of christ was based on, there was a good series of articles in slate on this right before xmas, if your interested in the topic i recommend them.
and as far as dude who was arguing that becasue christianity has been around for a while it must be true, i have rarely heard a poorer justification for a belief. lots of people have believed lots of bullshit for long periods of time, my friend. faith is necesary for chritianity because theere is no empirical evidence. as far as reality is concerned, god, ghosts, aliens and the monster under my bed are all on the same level. if you wanna believe, eat your heart out, but dont think you believe becasue your right.
as far as the reality of it, i think most serious scholars that study biblical hiostory would say that there probably was someone, or possibly a bunch of somones that the literary figure of christ was based on, there was a good series of articles in slate on this right before xmas, if your interested in the topic i recommend them.
and as far as dude who was arguing that becasue christianity has been around for a while it must be true, i have rarely heard a poorer justification for a belief. lots of people have believed lots of bullshit for long periods of time, my friend. faith is necesary for chritianity because theere is no empirical evidence. as far as reality is concerned, god, ghosts, aliens and the monster under my bed are all on the same level. if you wanna believe, eat your heart out, but dont think you believe becasue your right.