Pro Bowl Snubs! Check the list

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#24
LOL... I know huh.. he's getting wide open because of Moss and Stallworth being doubled on the outside so that's leaving Welker with one on one coverage
 
Mar 18, 2006
819
259
0
41
#25
Surprised that Winslow,Williams and Burress were overlooked....and to a lesser degree Nnamdi....Fred Taylor looks like he got snubbed now, but I don't remember him standing out at all at the beginning of the season....He is a durable player and will be known as one of those players who was always overlooked....maybe eventually he'll get a ring to get what really matters
 
Nov 7, 2006
7,383
36
0
39
#31
derek anderson should probably have gotten in over big ben
not really. big ben had more td's and is more accurate not sure about the other stats but those are pretty important. and big ben beat anderson's squad twice so i dunno what that does for ppl voting for anderson over ben. welker is probowl quality this year but the ppl who made it had a more productive year over him easily so i dont think he got snubbed. the only ppl who i honestly think who got snubbed is Fred Taylor (regardless what y'all say) and Charles Woodson. he deserved more than his fellow cb and he does more for the team with the returns and still has the better numbers to bACK it up. oh well what can ya do, still gonna watch
 
Oct 31, 2003
4,485
824
0
47
SAN DIEGO
SOUTHEASTSANDIEGO.COM
#34
THATS VERY VALID TO ME
that could also work against him, like someone else said taylor started running wild recently. unfortunatley the pro bowl voting has been going on for some time. so by the time his votes started adding up, was a little too late. and the 5 yd avg could be decieving. he is getting less carries, the more carries you get the harder it is to maintain that avg. so, less carries is actually in his favor