Our calendar system is unconstitutional and MUST be changed.

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Dirty Shoez

Dirty Shoez

Sicc OG
#1
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
41
www.myspace.com
#1
This cannot continue.

A.D. as we all know stands for Anno Domini, the Year of the (our) Lord. And what of those with no Lord, the Lord God? This is unfair to them.

I propose we wipe out this whole unconstitutional, anti-Atheist system and replace it with one that starts on July 4, 1776. That is the only fair way.

We must also change those names on the calendar which are named after Greco-Roman Gods, i.e., March, June, etc.



If you aren't with me on this one, then you must in fact be some crazed, right-wing fundamentalist zealot that will not stand for the removal of God from our calendar system and is trying to impose your beliefs on us. But guess what? If you don't like the Separation of Church and State, then LEAVE! :mad:
 
Fridge

Fridge

Sicc OG
#2
Mar 13, 2003
3,347
53
0
41
www.billythefridge.com
#2
The problem with God is too many assholes have a very distincive impression of him/her and it's going to be a conflict of interest when a teacher who believes in Christianity is supposed to teach to a class that contains Jews, Muslims, Budhists and Agnostics. There's enough other shit that the children must learn, if the parents believe enough in the rule of the church, most of them can find a Sunday school to send their children to.

God is everywhere, that does not mean his word must be everywhere... especially a fallible word that was edited and transcribed through time by rulers that have proved susceptible to corruption. The word of god should be within yourself, or instilled by people you love and trust. Not taught by people who have a base curriculum already at hand.

The taboo of religion is well placed outside of the classroom. Private schools are reserved for those who feel it's neccessary to mix the basic education with belief based learning. We already live in a Christian world, as you've pointed out with A.D. The seperation of church and state simply ensures an equal, non-bias playing field for all religions as far as taxation and representation of our government stands.

These topics however, are only brought about to seperate the huddled masses and cause resentment and cunfusion for the lower classes, to prevent an uprise against the system. Simply fighting these petty wars of belief are keeping us from living our lives to the happiest and fullest capacity.
 
T

TROLL

Sicc OG
#6
Aug 8, 2003
5,360
22
0
42
#6
Dirty Shoez said:
This cannot continue.

A.D. as we all know stands for Anno Domini, the Year of the (our) Lord. And what of those with no Lord, the Lord God? This is unfair to them.

I propose we wipe out this whole unconstitutional, anti-Atheist system and replace it with one that starts on July 4, 1776. That is the only fair way.

We must also change those names on the calendar which are named after Greco-Roman Gods, i.e., March, June, etc.



If you aren't with me on this one, then you must in fact be some crazed, right-wing fundamentalist zealot that will not stand for the removal of God from our calendar system and is trying to impose your beliefs on us. But guess what? If you don't like the Separation of Church and State, then LEAVE! :mad:
Click to expand...
i sense sarcasm
 
Dirty Shoez

Dirty Shoez

Sicc OG
#7
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
41
www.myspace.com
#7
^^ About time!

Seriously. If Under God is unconstitutional, then so is this. If you asshole son of a bitch Atheists want to make shit tough for we God-belivers, then by God, we are going to make shit tough for EVERYBODY. And that includes making our country look like a bunch of PC Retards by eleminating the Calendar and re-naming months of the year.

"When were you born?"
"Oh...Back in 198--I mean, 213."


The shit would be classic!
 
XxtraMannish

XxtraMannish

Sicc OG
#10
Jun 27, 2005
5,207
0
0
#10
Dirty Shoez said:
^^ About time!

Seriously. If Under God is unconstitutional, then so is this. If you asshole son of a bitch Atheists want to make shit tough for we God-belivers, then by God, we are going to make shit tough for EVERYBODY.
Click to expand...
I'm not an athiest, but can I ask you just what the fuck you're talking about? What athiests are making your life so hard?
 
Dirty Shoez

Dirty Shoez

Sicc OG
#11
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
41
www.myspace.com
#11
Just about any fagball Atheist that sees "Under God", Intelligent Design, Boy Scouts refusing non-believer members, et al, as some kind of "threat" to our society, and so-called "proof" we are headed towards a Theocracy.

Its real simple: disagree with this topic, and you better not ever...EVER complain about "Separation of Church and State" again. Not EVER.....NEVER.
 
T

TROLL

Sicc OG
#12
Aug 8, 2003
5,360
22
0
42
#12
Lol.. i dont agree with the athiests who are trying too change things.. imposing your beliefs on everyone else's is hypocritical from an athiests view point.. but hey im not athiest so i cant really say.. but its like treating a burn with gasoline.. heh..
 
T

TROLL

Sicc OG
#13
Aug 8, 2003
5,360
22
0
42
#13
Dirty Shoez said:
Its real simple: disagree with this topic, and you better not ever...EVER complain about "Separation of Church and State" again. Not EVER.....NEVER.
Click to expand...
hehe u trying too quell a loud voice.. just because i dont agree that under god, or in god we trust in our money is what we as a nations should be worried about, i am STILL all for seperation of church and state..
 
XxtraMannish

XxtraMannish

Sicc OG
#14
Jun 27, 2005
5,207
0
0
#14
Dirty Shoez said:
Just about any fagball Atheist that sees "Under God", Intelligent Design, Boy Scouts refusing non-believer members, et al, as some kind of "threat" to our society, and so-called "proof" we are headed towards a Theocracy.

Its real simple: disagree with this topic, and you better not ever...EVER complain about "Separation of Church and State" again. Not EVER.....NEVER.
Click to expand...
So these "fagball athiests" are making your life tough because they believe in separation of church and state? Big fuckin deal, the christians that founded this country believed in it too. I agree that the under god shit is really a non issue, but I would be inclined to think that technically speaking, it should not be there, nor should "In God We Trust" be printed on the money.
 
Dirty Shoez

Dirty Shoez

Sicc OG
#15
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
41
www.myspace.com
#15
^^ One step at a time, sport.

@Troll
If you're "all for" it, then that means all or nothing.


No more In God We Trust, and presto changeo, your new Birthday is the 15th of Franklin, 203.

No more "Under God", and biff boom bam, no more Christmas bonus.



You can't have it every way.
 
Dirty Shoez

Dirty Shoez

Sicc OG
#16
Oct 28, 2005
2,980
25
0
41
www.myspace.com
#16
Oh Yeah...."technically speaking", 'Separation of Church and State' does not appear in the Constitution. It simply doesn't. It does not exist, in whole or in part. It was something that was `discovered' (like the "Right" to Abortion) by crazed, power-hungry Justices that sought infamy and prestige rather than a correct reading of the law.
 
T

TROLL

Sicc OG
#18
Aug 8, 2003
5,360
22
0
42
#18
Dirty Shoez said:
^^ One step at a time, sport.

@Troll
If you're "all for" it, then that means all or nothing.


No more In God We Trust, and presto changeo, your new Birthday is the 15th of Franklin, 203.

No more "Under God", and biff boom bam, no more Christmas bonus.



You can't have it every way.
Click to expand...
"all for it" does not mean all or nothing... i think that the seperation of church and state IMO is best suited for judical decisions and decisions that will effect the well being of society.. the small things like "in god we trust" and "under god" arent doing any harm.. u have too remember tadou, im not athiest, u remember what i follow, i can respect other deities so "under god" and "in god we trust" can be said respectfully, tho i hold my own regards.. i think its a waste of resource's for our government too waste tiime with these issues and worry more about getting more money in the pocketz of the low-income hard worker then to worry about a persons attempt too make the world change to suit their own beliefs..
 
LA Dodgers

LA Dodgers

Sicc OG
#20
Sep 25, 2005
1,281
0
0
49
#20
Dirty Shoez said:
Oh Yeah...."technically speaking", 'Separation of Church and State' does not appear in the Constitution. It simply doesn't. It does not exist, in whole or in part. It was something that was `discovered' (like the "Right" to Abortion) by crazed, power-hungry Justices that sought infamy and prestige rather than a correct reading of the law.
Click to expand...
100% correct
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom