On Mosques and Madison

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Timm

Banned
Sep 16, 2008
5,632
7
0
104
It's as accurate as a BBC source, besides there's a kid from south korea who goes to my school, I'll ask him what the fuck is up tuesday for you guys since you seem to be so concerned with my sources, yet instantly accept CNN and BBC as accurate. Every time you guys get owned in an argument youjust say "your sources blow". No, fuck your garbage ass sources, I should just do that in every liberal thread now. Instead of making an intelligent comeback I'll just criticize your source. Faggot tried to run up on me with a liberal BBC article and I fired back with an actual video of North Korean telivision. Even without the words you can see how they edited the video. I win, suck my dick
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
It's as accurate as a BBC source,
Timm, with BBC we can actually contact them via email, phone, fax, etc and call them on their BS. With your video, just like some of the other material you've posted, we don't even know if it is real.

besides there's a kid from south korea who goes to my school, I'll ask him what the fuck is up tuesday for you guys since you seem to be so concerned with my sources
Timm, part of the rules of this forum are to cite your sources. You passed the information off as fact without even knowing what they were saying, and this is something you shouldn't do. For all we know the subs/captions could be correct but what if they aren't? What if they're actually saying, "Buy more water to support our fatigued team" or "Don't those uniforms look great?" What if they're saying, "Fuck Timmy with wa rusty knife and dump his corpse in the water"?

yet instantly accept CNN and BBC as accurate.
Who has done this?

every time you guys get owned in an argument youjust say "your sources blow".
Who has done this? This is probably my first time speaking with you, so you need to be specific and not make generalizations because I haven't done such a thing.

No, fuck your garbage ass sources, I should just do that in every liberal thread now.
And you'll probably be banned. BTW, I couldn't care less about liberal or conservative.

Instead of making an intelligent comeback I'll just criticize your source.
Timm, you made a claim and EverReadyT9X posted something to refute your claim. You then posted a vid to refute his claim and I then asked you about your source. Your source was not criticized it was questioned and there is a difference. Moreover, in questioning your source, I said it could very well be accurate, but if you're going to provide a source and cite the info as fact, people need to be able to verify it. This is debate 101.

Faggot tried to run up on me with a liberal BBC article and I fired back with an actual video of North Korean telivision.
Yet we don't know why the subs are in the video or who put them there.

Even without the words you can see how they edited the video.
How do we know the person who created the subs didn't edit the video?

I win, suck my dick
Not once have I came at you faulty, called you a name, told you to suck dick, etc. If I'm giving you that much respect you should do the same. If not, I can go there as well...
 
Jun 27, 2005
5,207
0
0
OK HERSHEY BAR.

SOURCE: NORTH KOREA'S 1 TV STATION
Actually, your source is a clearly edited (you said it yourself) youtube clip of a Korean TV broadcast which was edited by an unknown source.

This was also taken from a news broadcast and posted on youtube:


I'm pretty sure this clip didn't air on TV in this form