Oakland's own Andre Ward wins Fighter of The Year 2011 [boxing]

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
Congratulations!


Andre Ward Named Sports Illustrated Fighter of the Year
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/20...x/12/19/andre.ward.fighter.of.year/index.html



There is a certain rhythm to Andre Ward's game, a musical elegance gifted only to the finest performers. The technical brilliance is there, a product of a 10-year amateur career that culminated with an Olympic gold medal in 2004. There is the strength and power, quickness and speed, a perfect blend of skills that have, thus far, made Ward unbeatable at the pro level. He is, as Carl Froch put it on Saturday night, moments after Ward beat him for the Super Six title, "a slippery eel," hard, if not impossible, to cleanly hit, a fighter without concussive power but, at 168 pounds, physically stronger than the rest. He's something else, too: SI.com's 2011 Fighter of the Year.

It has been a banner year for Ward, one that has seen the Oakland-based boxer emerge as an heir apparent to the aging greats in the sport. In May he stepped in the ring with Arthur Abraham, a feared puncher who began Showtime's vaunted super middleweight tournament as one of the favorites. Over 12 lopsided rounds Ward made Abraham look silly, peppering him with combinations and forcing the fight on the inside, preventing Abraham from stepping back and extending on any power shots. The win advanced Ward to the finals against Froch, a gritty British brawler who came into the fight teeming with confidence. That confidence drained quickly when it became clear Froch, like so many others, could do little with Ward's speed and found that the punches that had rattled Abraham, Glen Johnson and Andre Dirrell earlier in the tournament just bounced off Ward's chiseled physique. "He's not a big puncher but physically, he's quite strong," Froch said. "I lost the fight for sure. I got beat by the better man."

• SI.com's Complete 2011 Boxing Awards

The goal of the Super Six was to brand a champion, to bring clarity to a division that has been muddled since Joe Calzaghe retired and elevate one of the fighters to the loftiest of levels. From the tournament's inception Ward embodied a Super Six fighter, supremely skilled but, outside of Oakland, largely anonymous. He's not a knockout artist, nor is he a brash talker. No, Ward is a quiet family man, loyal -- he has trained with Virgil Hunter since he was 9 years old -- and honest, always believing his talent would carry him to the top.
Alone, Ward might have struggled finding opportunities. His style isn't always fan-friendly and European fighters like Mikkel Kessler (whom Ward beat in 2009 to claim his first world title), Abraham and Froch would have, under normal circumstances, been unlikely to travel stateside to face him. It was the Super Six that brought them here, guaranteeing them lucrative paydays and premium U.S. television exposure in exchange for taking their act on the road.

Ward got the opportunities, and has taken advantage of them. His wins have been decisive, leaving no room for doubt. Ask people before the tournament who the No. 1 super middleweight was and the answers would vary. Ask them today, and there is only one.

Winning the Super Six is a high point for Ward, but it's unlikely to be his highest. He's a unified champion now, one with myriad opportunities. There is titleholder Lucian Bute, the moneyman in the division because of his drawing power in Canada. There is Kelly Pavlik, a popular American trying to reclaim a flagging career. If Ward moves up in weight, which he has said he is not opposed to, there are lucrative matchups with Jean Pascal or Bernard Hopkins. At 27, Ward is accomplished but, as he says, "I'm nowhere near my best."

"There are a lot of areas I'm still improving in," Ward said. "I'm not in my prime yet."

Scary, but probably true. Indeed, this has been a memorable year for Ward. But it likely won't be his last. With each win he gains more fans, his profile grows. There will come a time when Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather walk away, leaving a gaping void in the sport. Who knows if Ward will ever generate the same buzz. Mayweather and Pacquiao didn't become gold pay per view attractions until they fought Oscar De La Hoya, and there simply is no De La Hoya out there for Ward to fight. But the foundation of Mayweather and Pacquiao's popularity is their talent, and in that category Ward has proven he can measure up.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#4
The winner of the super six deserved to be Fighter of the year.
absolutely. Plus none of the super stars deserved it this year.

Floyd only fought once, Pacquiao didn't have a good year, Martinez didn't do much and Khan lost to Peterson. Hopefully this elevates Ward's status amongst boxing fans even more, he deserves some big paydays in the near feature.

Honorable mentions I think are Nonito Donaire, Brandon Rios & Lamont Peterson
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
42
#7
props to ward but bute would end that kids career.
lol, are u crazy? Bute already successfully avoided Ward through 2012. Ward makes every fighter look bad yet some how Bute whos fought absolutely noone worth talking about is gonna beat Ward. Kessler would destroy Bute, just sayen. And obviously Ward ran through Kessler
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#9
I know I'll probably catch heat for this, but I don't think he deserved fighter of the year.
He only fought twice, and one was a win over Abraham in which Abraham lost 2 of his last 3 fights. His win over some bum. Then he beat Froch in the US.

Even Rios fared better in 2011.
Beating Acosta (KO), Antillon (KO) & Murray (KO).

I just don't think Ward put on some stunning performance. He beat Froch who lost to Dirrell and Kessler. He beat Abraham, whoopee.
Seems like they are giving him credit for the entire Super 6 in the year of 2011.
 

WXS STOMP3R

SENIOR GANG MEMBER
Feb 27, 2006
6,313
1,454
113
48
#13
WARD IS A SOLID BOXER...AND AN INTELLIGENT FIGHTER...THERE'S OTHER BOXERS WHO COULD HAVE LANDED THIS AWARD...BUT WARD'S PAID HIS DUES... SO IT SHOULDN'T BE A SHOCKER HE GOT IT...

I THINK HE'S GONNA HAVE A HARD TIME GETTING FIGHTS WITH BIG PAY DAYS...YOU GOTTA BE A FAN OF PUGILISM TO ENJOY HIS STYLE OF BOXING...
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#14
I know I'll probably catch heat for this, but I don't think he deserved fighter of the year.
He only fought twice, and one was a win over Abraham in which Abraham lost 2 of his last 3 fights. His win over some bum. Then he beat Froch in the US.

Even Rios fared better in 2011.
Beating Acosta (KO), Antillon (KO) & Murray (KO).

I just don't think Ward put on some stunning performance. He beat Froch who lost to Dirrell and Kessler. He beat Abraham, whoopee.
Seems like they are giving him credit for the entire Super 6 in the year of 2011.
Rios had a good year but none of those guys mentioned were top pound 4 pound fighters. Carl Froch was top 10 or 15 pound 4 pound.

The main reason is because no one else had an incredible year. Pacquiao had a bad year, Floyd only fought once, Martinez didn't do much of anything. Which leaves Donaire, who beat a pound 4 pound fighter in Montiel in stunning fashion, but then sat out the rest of the year and had a lackluster performance over Narvaez. So that leaves Ward, who barely lost a round in two fights.

So really there are only three people in this discussion - Ward, Donaire & Rios. Ward & Donaire beat Rios out by beating higher quality opponents.
 
Feb 3, 2006
3,426
855
113
43
#15
I know I'll probably catch heat for this, but I don't think he deserved fighter of the year.
He only fought twice, and one was a win over Abraham in which Abraham lost 2 of his last 3 fights. His win over some bum. Then he beat Froch in the US.

Even Rios fared better in 2011.
Beating Acosta (KO), Antillon (KO) & Murray (KO).

I just don't think Ward put on some stunning performance. He beat Froch who lost to Dirrell and Kessler. He beat Abraham, whoopee.
Seems like they are giving him credit for the entire Super 6 in the year of 2011.
You can't lose your belt at the scales a be the fighter of the year. I want to see how Rios looks at 140lb.
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#16
I think it should be measured on how much you propelled.
From where Rios (or even Martinez for that matter) started at the beginning of the year to where they both are at now, is a greater gap than from where Ward started the year to where he is now. You really have to take into consideration that the trophy doesn't exist. That isn't even a recognized award. If it wasn't for that total failure of a tournament, it would have just been Ward beating an already beaten up Abraham, then yes getting a nice win over Froch.

I don't think Rios looks so good at 140. He drains himself to make weight. I really believe it will take him a full year to get in with the top contenders at 140.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#17
The trophy is just a trophy, however Ward unified the 168 pound division by winning WBA & WBC belts, along with The Ring belt, left absolutely no doubt he's the best fighter in the division and launched himself inside the top 5 pound for pound rankings everywhere (including The Ring).

Rios, as good as a year he's had, he's not even the best 135 pound fighter. He has the "regular" WBA belt, while Marquez owns the "super" WBA belt & The Ring Belt, meaning Rios's belt is a paper belt, it's not real considering JMM is the true champ of the division. Further despite the good year Rios had, it still didn't propel him into the top 10 pound for pound fighters in the world.
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#18
Ward had the belts. He just gained Froch's belt this year.
Then he beat a 160 lb. Abraham who moved up just for the tournament so you can't really credit that towards proving anything at 168. Whether anyone feels it will be competitive or not, Bute is a true 168 and at the very least can be given the number 2 spot without a fight.

So basically, Ward beat Froch.
FOY award?

I just see it differently.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#19
Ward had the belts. He just gained Froch's belt this year.
He gained Froch's belt and the most important belt by winning The Ring belt. When the #1 fights the #2 the Ring Belt is awarded, which is what happened.


Then he beat a 160 lb. Abraham who moved up just for the tournament so you can't really credit that towards proving anything at 168.
Abraham was ranked top 10 at 168, despite having bad fights prior. It's a win.

Whether anyone feels it will be competitive or not, Bute is a true 168 and at the very least can be given the number 2 spot without a fight.
Froch was #2, Ward was #1. At the time of the tournament, Bute was rematching Andrade because of his contraversial win where Bute was basically knocked out in the 12th round but saved by the hometown ref.

So basically, Ward beat Froch.
FOY award?

I just see it differently.
Froch is a solid fighter and better pound 4 pound than anyone rios beat. I mean to me it was between Ward & Donaire with Rios being an honorable mention. Again it's more of what other people didn't do (pac, floyd, martinez) then necessarily what ward did. All three of them had great years though.
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#20
All Donaire did was beat Montiel.
So did some guy named Victor Tarrazas (who?) last month in Mexico.

Oh and some 112lb 5'3 midget from Argentina who went the full 12 in a super boring fight.

Not his fault, since he is going through legal battles, but even Miguel Cotto did more than that. He's just up in the scene more than usual because of his photography hobby. That's really why we see him so much. If it wasn't for him taking photos most people would probably just forgot about him, like they have for the last 5 years.

I don't see Froch as being that great. He got schooled by Dirrell. Came back to KO Taylor (who hasn't?). Lost to Kessler. Lost to Ward. Froch is slow as hell. My Mom literally used to slap my face faster than that.

I have to give credit on how sloppy Ward made Froch look.
I agree in Froch being better than Acosta, Antillon and Murray but these guys aren't pushovers.
I would hold Rios's 3 massacre fashion KO's over them in higher regards than Ward (I never leave my backyard) 115-113 x2 win over Froch, any day.