No Oil, No liberation
- Thread starter 2-0-Sixx
- Start date
zzzzzz...phil how about you try and contribute to this board instead of sitting around whining and talkin bullshit? Post an article. Do you even read? I mean, honestly...your only comments on this board are either shit talking or backing something tadou or Hatch says.
"I agree 100%!"
Typical republican troll.
"I agree 100%!"
Typical republican troll.
i didnt dodge anything. i could sit here and cut and paste numerous posts of yours that go far beyond whining, and not only that, posts where i agree with 206, yourself, heresy, and the rest of you not so fond of america types, but what would that accomplish. yeah i talk shit, but you make it too easy. the tone of every one of your posts reeks of arrogance. you come across as a know it all and a liberal blowhard just like rush does for the right. ill try to post more articles so that the white devil doesnt feel like im not bringing enough thought to the table.
See but liberal biberal fiberal all that fuckin Fox News label shit I'm beyond...there's more than just "republican" and "Democrat"...that's such a simplistic G.I Joe vs. Cobra worldview.
Just because Fox News stuck it in your head that someone has to be exactly halfway between "Republican" and "Democrat", does not mean that everyone who isn't is a fanatical headcase. It cracks me up how people constantly slang the "far left" and "far right" labels...someone's views are their views....who gives a shit how "far left" they are. And all this "liberal" shit cracks me up....if I had a choice I'd have Nader or McCain in office, not Kerry or Gush.
Just because Fox News stuck it in your head that someone has to be exactly halfway between "Republican" and "Democrat", does not mean that everyone who isn't is a fanatical headcase. It cracks me up how people constantly slang the "far left" and "far right" labels...someone's views are their views....who gives a shit how "far left" they are. And all this "liberal" shit cracks me up....if I had a choice I'd have Nader or McCain in office, not Kerry or Gush.
youre right, there is so much more. i dont think either one of us fits the mold of republican or democrat but thats not to say you dont lean to the left or i dont lean to the right. you seem like a fairly intelligent human being, thats why it throws me off when you defend such blatant morons as michael moore, who is an intellectual fraud. by the way you see the fahrenheit movie yet?
Phil, you're basing the "intellectual fraud" label on the "exposing BFC" article right? Well I read that article and it was complete crap. The author assumes what he thought dude meant in one part, and he put words in his mouth in the next part. The dude who supposedly "debunked" BFC was straight up wrong in 90 percent of his article. The other 10 percent I agreed with, but you need to re-read that article. And why the fuck shouldn't I see F911? What, it's going to brainwash me? Is it going to shoot liberal rays into my mind? lmao.
And you see it as "leaning to the left" or right. I saw the left and right are phony ass labels used by people who don't want to take a comprehensive look at politics...so you can define yourself by them if you want.
And you see it as "leaning to the left" or right. I saw the left and right are phony ass labels used by people who don't want to take a comprehensive look at politics...so you can define yourself by them if you want.
Moore never "edited the shit out of Heston". He showed clips of Heston talking.
Did he say "This is what Heston said at a rally after Columbine"?
No. He said "The NRA held a rally at columbine"...then spliced in Heston talking. Could you say that he had the intent of saying that is what Heston said? Possibly. But since in the "exposing BFC" thread you are so big on the facts...we will go with the facts. Moore never lied in the movie. He never claimed the Heston speech was at the Columbine rally.
He simply put in clips of Heston talking. And what someone says is what someone says no matter when they say them.
Did he say "This is what Heston said at a rally after Columbine"?
No. He said "The NRA held a rally at columbine"...then spliced in Heston talking. Could you say that he had the intent of saying that is what Heston said? Possibly. But since in the "exposing BFC" thread you are so big on the facts...we will go with the facts. Moore never lied in the movie. He never claimed the Heston speech was at the Columbine rally.
He simply put in clips of Heston talking. And what someone says is what someone says no matter when they say them.
i didnt in any way suggest you shouldnt see it. im eager to do so myself, i just refuse to put a dollar in his pocket thats all. i was just curious of your opinion of it. i havent got to see it yet.
like i said im neither republican or democrat, but i lean to the right on more issues than the left and vice versa for you. you can cut it up any way you want its still what it is. phony label or not,
like i said im neither republican or democrat, but i lean to the right on more issues than the left and vice versa for you. you can cut it up any way you want its still what it is. phony label or not,
Americans don't care about this. Although it would be the moral and ethical thing to do, intervene and help these people out. But Americans think that we are doing enough just by putting $5 a month in an envelope to help a starving child.
Because of the Iraq situation, the American population is going to be more hesitant to send troops somewhere else. And who is to say that these people will accept us with open arms? We thought Iraq would accept us with open arms. Americans are very uneducated on this topic and probably don't even know what continent Sudan and Chad are located on. But we've had all of this Iraq propaganda fed to us for years. There is nothing of value there and we don't want to fight someone elses battle unless there is something in it for us.
Because of the Iraq situation, the American population is going to be more hesitant to send troops somewhere else. And who is to say that these people will accept us with open arms? We thought Iraq would accept us with open arms. Americans are very uneducated on this topic and probably don't even know what continent Sudan and Chad are located on. But we've had all of this Iraq propaganda fed to us for years. There is nothing of value there and we don't want to fight someone elses battle unless there is something in it for us.
I supported taking out a dictator who had sights set on us. These people doing the ethnic cleansing want nothing with us. That being said, I also support the aftereffect of what we did (the liberation of Iraq). Ideally, we could liberate these people, but obviously on the ladder of priorities, Iraq would be higher up than this situation.
HAHSHAHSHAHSHAHHASAH
Even the white house and the Bush administration has admitted Saddam had nothing whatsoever planned against the US. They even interred military experts including Tom Clancy who basically told them all of their sci-fi scenarios based on not intelligence but feasibility including floating a tanker all the way out to the US and sending a UAV with chemical weapons were absolute crap. Saddam had absolutely no intentions of attacking the US. None.
Even the white house and the Bush administration has admitted Saddam had nothing whatsoever planned against the US. They even interred military experts including Tom Clancy who basically told them all of their sci-fi scenarios based on not intelligence but feasibility including floating a tanker all the way out to the US and sending a UAV with chemical weapons were absolute crap. Saddam had absolutely no intentions of attacking the US. None.