New Monetary System, New World Order is Here!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#4
Limiting the exposure of credit default swaps, the easy access to higher credit rankings by piggybacking on large firms, and curtailing what basically amounted to a free A rating for any firm or group whose services are deemed essential to national market interests != NWO Amero coins

More know-nothing speculation by the tinfoilers
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,002
86
48
#15
lol god damn.....

and one economy with one currency is a shitty idea.

miro....use another source that's no wikipedia....cause i can edit those pages if i want, and there's not really anyone to cross reference that shit. my only point is, i was told in college that wikipedia is a shitty unreliable source and it wasn't allowed.....so, for the sake of fact, i gotta say the same thing here....

and who gives a fuck if the human species dies off? the human species is like a fucking virus on thsi planet.....won't stop spreading and won't stop causing irreversible damage....sounds like cancer to me. lol....i'd rather have different cultures, religions and everything with people CONFLICTING than have one happy ass brainwashed faggot ass society. there is no utopia.
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#16
the human species is like a fucking virus on thsi planet.....won't stop spreading and won't stop causing irreversible damage....sounds like cancer to me. lol

Seriously!

I am following this shit about the Auto bailout and I read that part of what was holding up this last attempt at legislation was that the Republicans didn't like some of the stipulations such as;

A breakthrough came when Democrats agreed to scrap language — which the White House had called a "poison pill" — that would have forced the carmakers to drop lawsuits challenging tough emissions limits in California and other states.
I mean are you fucking kidding me? You are STILL arguing against tougher emissions laws? Holy shit, what the fuck don't you understand about pollution=bad? You want the carmakers to CONTINUE thier lawsuits against higher emissions standards? :dead:

It's like we are all subconsciously suicidal and when someone tell us we are on our way to killing ourselves, we say thanks and just keep right on going.
 

Miro

Sicc OG
Sep 20, 2006
195
4
0
74
#17
miro....use another source that's no wikipedia....cause i can edit those pages if i want, and there's not really anyone to cross reference that shit. my only point is, i was told in college that wikipedia is a shitty unreliable source and it wasn't allowed.....so, for the sake of fact, i gotta say the same thing here....
you're instructor might have been an aging professor with no email account or probably a computer, so when he first heard that anybody can edit wikipedia articles, without any opposing thought he ruled that wikipedia was not an accurate source.

the idea behind wikipedia is an fairly new one, a huge collaboration of people that want to make something work without getting paid or compensated, and without the internet it would be impossible for such an idea to work.

Its the same idea thats behind open source programs, firefox, linux OS, and makes them good alternative for software than the software you pay for, firefox is consider to be the leading Web browser, technologies that show up there migrate to other browsers, Linux is used in major computer systems that i'm sure has an effect in your life. Both technologies were created by people for free!!

As i type this your professor might have been somewhat correct, you should NOT use an encyclopedia as a source for a college paper!!!

Wikipedia survives research test
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4530930.stm

The Rise of Crowdsourcing
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html

and who gives a fuck if the human species dies off? the human species is like a fucking virus on thsi planet.....won't stop spreading and won't stop causing irreversible damage....sounds like cancer to me. lol....
you might not give a fuck, but i do, so does my family, my kids, my friends, my co workers. So yea, people are not going to go back and live fairly on the planet like how animals do, every year our species consumes vast amounts of energy, and in order for that energy to be present we need to have some type of unification.


.i'd rather have different cultures, religions and everything with people CONFLICTING than have one happy ass brainwashed faggot ass society. there is no utopia.
i really dont think you believe that.

humans are getting more and more logical, and we're losing our basic instincts/subconscious mind.
 

I AM

Some Random Asshole
Apr 25, 2002
21,002
86
48
#19
you're instructor might have been an aging professor with no email account or probably a computer, so when he first heard that anybody can edit wikipedia articles, without any opposing thought he ruled that wikipedia was not an accurate source.




you might not give a fuck, but i do, so does my family, my kids, my friends, my co workers. So yea, people are not going to go back and live fairly on the planet like how animals do, every year our species consumes vast amounts of energy, and in order for that energy to be present we need to have some type of unification.




i really dont think you believe that.

humans are getting more and more logical, and we're losing our basic instincts/subconscious mind
.
Actually she wasn't, she was pretty young. And I actually found some good info, but knowing that I can personally go onto the "Uncle Tom" definition page and insert a picture of Dirty Shoez aka Tadou (from here) then it's not a very reliable source. LOL.....

And I know the idea behind it. Wikipedia isn't some magical new thing that happened yesterday.

And HUMANS ARE ANIMALS.....don't get that shit twisted. HUMAN SPECIES.....just like other SPECIES of animal.

In regard to the bold, YES I do believe that. I'd rather that the human species be erased off the face of the planet than killing and destroying all the wild life and the entire planet as a whole--and I'd rather have humans be erased that be in ONE unified RELIGION, CULTURE, or ANY OF THE ABOVE. Humans have been here for a fraction of a second in relation to the rest of the universe, and HUMANS have already fucked the planet up BEYOND ANY REPAIR.....

No ONE thing is right for everyone--and I"m not talking abotu science.

But....as a rebuttal to your comment about humans using more logic.....WHERE THE FUCK DO DUMB ASS RELIGIOUS PEOPLE FIT INTO USING LOGIC? RELIGION IS NOT LOGICAL. Believe in something you cannot prove or see--that's not logic, that's BLIND FAITH.....completely different.
 
Feb 23, 2005
367
0
0
#20
you're instructor might have been an aging professor with no email account or probably a computer, so when he first heard that anybody can edit wikipedia articles, without any opposing thought he ruled that wikipedia was not an accurate source.

the idea behind wikipedia is an fairly new one, a huge collaboration of people that want to make something work without getting paid or compensated, and without the internet it would be impossible for such an idea to work.
Ever teacher I've had since 2005 have ruled out Wikipedia as a resource. I've been to 3 different colleges. I'm an IT student. And guess what, they won't allow you to use any Wiki sites.

The sheer fact that anybody can edit a post on Wikipedia makes it un-reliable. I can edit it while doing a paper just to prove my point.