Trainer takes blame for Marquardt's recent defeat, promises fireworks at UFC 128
Perennial UFC middleweight contender Nate Marquardt (30-10-2 MMA, 9-4 UFC) has been to the top of the mountain. Unfortunately, he's just never been able to set foot on the summit.
Those days are over, said Marquardt's trainer, Trevor Wittman.
After Marquardt was defeated at this past November's UFC 122 event – a result for which Wittman takes full responsibility – the Grudge Training Center head said "The Great" is re-energized, refocused and ready to turn some heads at this weekend's UFC 128 event.
"In this next fight, Nate is a new dude," Wittman told MMAjunkie.com (
www.mmajunkie.com). "He's risen so many times to No. 1 contention and then let it fall out of his hands. Not anymore.
"Nate is to the point where he doesn't care about winning or losing. It's time to perform. When he talks like that, it's a different Nathan Marquardt."
Marquardt faces late-replacement Dan Miller (13-4 MMA, 5-3 UFC) on the main card of UFC 128, which takes place at New Jersey's Prudential Center.
A former King of Pancrase, Marqaurdt made his way to the UFC in 2005. After rattling off wins over Ivan Salaverry, Joe Doerksen, Crafton Wallace and Dean Lister, Marquardt was granted a shot at the belt against Anderson Silva. Like every other opponent to step into the octagon with "The Spider," Marquardt was defeated.
Marquardt has pined for a rematch ever since.
Twice in 2010, Marquardt knocked on the door, only to be turned away. First, it was against a streaking Chael Sonnen, who grinded his way to decision win at UFC 109. Then, it was the oft-forgotten Yushin Okami, who edged out Marquardt at UFC 122.
While Sonnen must be credited for a virtuoso performance, Wittman takes the blame for the loss to Okami.
"I take full blame on the last fight," Wittman said. "I felt the gameplan that I had put together and built, I don't think I structured it correctly for Nate to go out there and do what he had to do to win the fight. It's one of those things where I thought Nate's counter-punching was stronger and more precise and well-timed. But we got outworked.
"Our gameplan was to completely counterpunch and fire off shots when Okami was in the exchanges because he punches pretty much from his holsters and doesn't bring his hands back. I wasn't working on a lot of having Nate finish combinations with extra shots to the head or the body. It was just petty much counterpunching: When he throws the left hand, look for this counter, when he throws the jab, this is the counter we're looking at, When he leaps in with a powershot, we're grabbing his hips and getting a takedown. It was more of an issue of not going on to Plan B. I take full responsibility for him not going out and getting the finish in that fight."
It was a performance that drew criticism not only for Marquardt, but also his Greg Jackson-led team, as UFC president Dana White openly questioned the wisdom of the between-round advice offered by the corner.
"Marquardt is such a talented guy, and what I'm seeing is stuff from the Greg Jackson camp," White stated at the UFC 122 post-event press conference. "This camp continuously – when these guys fight, their corner is either telling them they're ahead or they're winning.
"I mean, Nate Marquardt sat here tonight and said that he thought he won the fight. Where the [expletive] is his corner? You go into the last round and you're getting outstruck by a wrestler, and you think you won the fight? And this is consistent with the Greg Jackson camp."
Wittman believes White was well within his rights as UFC boss to question the coaching. However, he insists White was mistaken as to the team's intentions.
"It's one of those things where Dana had talked [expletive] about us doing the right thing in the corner, but I don't think he heard that right," Wittman said. "We were miked up. It's not what we said.
"I actually told Nate that I thought he lost the fight. Greg Jackson said the same thing going into the third round. I thought we needed a knockout to win the fight. We told him that."
But that's all in the past now. Gone is the 1-2 stretch of 2010. Marqaurdt brings a new mindset to this weekend's card, and Wittman said it's Miller who will be the unfortunate opponent forced to deal with the change.
"The loss to Okami awoke Nate like it did when he lost Silva," Wittman said. "You can really expect fireworks in this next fight."