State officials weigh in on new weight classes
A wise man once said "to change and change for the better are two different things."
The Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) last week found itself toeing that fine line when the group released its newly revamped recommendations for the Unified Rules of Mixed Martial Arts. While there were several issues addressed in the new form, only one has caused an uproar: the changing of MMA's traditional weight classes to a new 14-tier system.
Several of the country's most influential athletic-board directors also disagree with the new weight class standards, and a few shared their thoughts with MMAjunkie.com (
www.mmajunkie.com).
As part of the new guidelines, existing weight classes would be totally revamped. For example, the currently popular light-heavyweight division (185.6-205 pounds) would become a "middleweight" division (185.1-195) and a "super middleweight" division (195.1-205). Likewise, the current 170-pound welterweight class would instead be 165.1-175 pounds, and a new "super welterweight" division would run from 175.1 to 185 pounds.
Additionally, a current heavyweight class (205.1 to 265 pounds) already light on talent would be further diminished under the new system, which would change the weight class from 225.1 to 265 pounds.
"I know that in Ohio, we are not going to go with the weight-class rules," Bernie Profato, executive director of the Ohio State Athletic Commission, said. "That's affirmative."
Nick Lembo, legal counsel for the New Jersey Athletic Control Board, agreed.
"The weight classes in New Jersey are going to stay according to the original unified rules," Lembo said.
The issue of uniformity
The standards issued by the ABC are simply a guideline of recommendations that each state is free to adopt in whole or modify as it sees fit. However, every one of the directors that spoke with MMAjunkie.com stressed the importance of uniformity in regards to MMA regulation.
In fact, one of the co-author's of the new standards, legendary MMA referee "Big" John McCarthy, said that's exactly why the changes are needed.
"We (in the MMA community) say that we go by the unified rules," McCarthy said. "Well, there are too many places that change them. Every commission starts to change those rules the way they want.
"It should be that [the state athletic commissions] all follow one set of rules. Wherever you go, it's the same. That's what you need to have -- consistency for not only the fighters, (but also) the officials and the fans of the sport."
Unfortunately, the only unity created thus far appears to be the united front of several of the commissions against the new codes. The primary argument against the weight-class adjustments has been the lack of a need for change.
"Where did it need to be fixed?" Profato asked. "I've had over 300 MMA fight (cards) in the state of Ohio. ... Not one time have we ever heard, 'Hey, we've got to change these weight classes."
A need for change?
McCarthy, whose days in MMA lead back to nearly the birth of the sport in the U.S., said that type of reactionary attitude could eventually lead to currently unforeseen issues within the sport.
"(UFC President) Dana White's a guy who's saying ... that this is going to be the biggest sport in the world," McCarthy said. "So do you wait until that point, or do you say, 'Hey, you know what? We're getting more and more athletes getting into this sport all the time.'
"Why should you wait until you have too many people with these few weight classes? It's silly; start to look at things from the beginning."
McCarthy also said he considers the new weight classes the next logical step in the evolution of a sport that began as an open-weight affair.
"Look at where the UFC came from; there were no weight class," McCarthy said. "Then there were two. Back at UFC 12, which Dana wouldn't know about anyway, but back at UFC 12, there was a change where we had lightweight and heavyweight. There was a lightweight that was up to 199.9 pounds, (and) heavyweight was 200-plus.
"Then [UFC officials] decided, 'No, that's going to be our middleweight.' At UFC 16, they brought in the lightweights and said that was up to 170 pounds because, 'Look, weight does make a difference in the sport.' When you start talking about people with good technical abilities, the big guys are going to beat the small guys. If you have two guys of different sizes, and they have the same technical ability, the big guy usually has the advantage.
"It's the evolution of the sport, and there are more guys getting involved in it."
But several of the commissioners explained there wasn't a reason to expand or even define weight classes, as current rules allow promoters to make a fight at any weight they want. We have seen several recent examples of this situation, with a number of "catch weight" fights in both the UFC and EliteXC. A UFC 60 main event between 170-pound champ Matt Hughes and Royce Gracie -- which was held at 175 pounds -- is one such example.
"I'm not even sure if commissions need to be that involved in what the weight classes are," Keith Kizer, executive director of the Nevada State Athletic Commission, said. "What matters is the weight, not what you call them. ... Any promoter can come in and say, 'These two guys are going to fight. Maximum weight 225 (pounds).'
"They don't need a separate weight class."
More data needed
State executives also expressed concern over the lack of data collected before the ABC decided to make such a change.
"When it came to the weight classes, we needed to have a more detailed discussion," Lembo said. "When I wrote the first draft of the (original) unified rules in New Jersey, it involved comments from the fans, the media, fighters, managers, promotions and other commissions and doctors. And to just go to such a drastic change with the very limited amount of discussion that we had on the topic, I'm not in favor of it."
Profato echoed Lembo's sentiments that more study was needed before making such a radical change to the current system.
"I think we have to sit down and kind of look at the direction we're going," Profato said. "Set up a committee, a strong committee, with the big states -- Nevada, Ohio, California, New Jersey -- and get eight or 10 people on that committee. Take these things one little piece at a time. Decipher it. Study it."
The UFC's best interest
As with any change in MMA, the support of the sport's largest promotion -- the UFC -- is paramount for the adjustment to gain any real traction. White, who oversees the day-to-day operation of the world's largest MMA promotion, has already gone on record vehemently opposing the changes, and he's been adamant that the UFC won't adopt them.
McCarthy said he expected as much from his former employer. However, he said that White was not considering the best interest of the sport, or its competitors, as a whole.
"Dana White is a promoter," McCarthy said. "If he doesn't like something, he's going to lash out about it. Dana's a guy with power right now. He promotes the biggest promotion there is in the sport, and he truly has a lot of control over the sport right now because the UFC is so powerful.
"He promotes the UFC. The UFC is what he cares about. Does Dana truly care about fighters that are fighting in EliteXC? Does he truly care about fighters in a TFA event in California -- or in the Backwoods Brawl, or whatever? He doesn't care because it's not the UFC."
Overhaul of the ABC itself?
Many commissioners also felt that beyond setting aside the weight-class changes for the time being, the result of the proceedings highlight the need for changes in the way the Association of Boxing Commissions is run, especially in regards to its treatment of MMA.
"What happened [at the ABC conference] should be tabled," Lembo said. "I think the ABC, if they're going to get involved in MMA, should change the name of the organization. I think they should change their bylaws to include MMA, and I think you need a full MMA committee. And all these issues need to be vetted through the committee and studied with all of the interested parties, and then the committee presents a document to the ABC membership at the convention, and it's voted upon with justifications and reasons for the changes."
Kizer also felt the new rules were drafted under less-than-ideal circumstances.
"The whole point of uniform rules is to make them unified," Kizer said. "Nobody was using these weight classes. Now if some people were using these weight classes and some people weren't, that might make some sense. This wasn't a unification. This was to create a whole new set of rules on short notice that no one had any input in drafting other than (Canadian commissioner Dale Kliparchuk) and John McCarthy.
"Usually we do committees and things like that, so it's just very disturbing. I definitely want John McCarthy's input on it, but it seems like more so he wrote them and said, 'These aren't the unified rules. These are the John McCarthy rules.' And they may have some validity to them, but that's not how we get things done at the ABC. Or at least, that's not how we used to, and I'm very unhappy."
McCarthy denied being solely responsible for the drafting of the new weight classes.
"It wasn't like I came about wanting to change weight classes," McCarthy said. "This is not about what John McCarthy wants. I wish I could make things the way that I wanted, but I can't do that. This is a bunch of different people from different commission that end up coming together and saying they need changes in something, or they want to make changes, and that's how it all comes about."
With commissioners throughout the country obviously opposed to the new set of weight classes, it appears that the ABC's decision new guidelines will be quickly tossed aside. The earliest the ABC can revisit the issue is at its 2009 conference in New Orleans.
"Since the meeting, I've been contacted by several other states, and I have their support," Lembo said. "I would anticipate that the ABC is going to be reviewing this matter and possibly amending that guideline."