@Mcleanhatch......examining Glick's words

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#22
Snubnoze said:
STILL no answer.... I guess he just gave up :\
Snubnoze said:
When I say he didn't deserve it, I don't say "because thats my opinion" I say BECAUSE HE MADE NO FALSE CLAIMS AND WAS ACTING CALM AND LIKE A GENTLEMEN...
come on he was spinning out of his ass. no normal person would think the way he was unless he had an obvious agenda. i would have had more respect for him had he said that he was against war for personal reasons. but he didnt he gave some bullshit excuse that all the anit-war guys are using. he has also signed all those anti-war ads that were run in newspapers. thats ads were anti-bush ads not anti-war ads "IN MY OPINION"

and what does acting calm like a gentleman have to do with anything??

i remember Clinton acting calm like a gentleman when he went before the nation and said "i did not have sexual relations with that woman monica lewinski" and lied to our faces,
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#23
Mcleanhatch said:




come on he was spinning out of his ass. no normal person would think the way he was unless he had an obvious agenda. i would have had more respect for him had he said that he was against war for personal reasons. but he didnt he gave some bullshit excuse that all the anit-war guys are using. he has also signed all those anti-war ads that were run in newspapers. thats ads were anti-bush ads not anti-war ads "IN MY OPINION"
no spin zone!? LMAO

he was just trying to state to O'Reilly why he's is holding the position that he's in....so if someone spins on this "no spin zone"
O'Reilly can yell at you to "SHUT UP!!!!"?

O'Reilly couldn't control his show so he told him to shup up
hmmm i htink O'Reilly an his buddies have an agenda...the right
wing media.

You never hear anything that Glick said to O'Reilly on tv, becuase
the media leans right!...yet another example for the the following
thread: THE ILLIBERAL MEDIA http://siccness.net/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=44225&highlight=chomsky


Mcleanhatch said:


and what does acting calm like a gentleman have to do with anything??
JA JA, rightwinger can't be tolerant......LMAO!!!


to have good reporting, u can't have people yelling at each
other when debating...aah i forgot this isn't news, its entertament


Mcleanhatch said:

i remember Clinton acting calm like a gentleman when he went before the nation and said "i did not have sexual relations with that woman monica lewinski" and lied to our faces,
ok
 
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#24
come on he was spinning out of his ass. no normal person would think the way he was unless he had an obvious agenda.
Nothing he said was false... No normal person would think that way because THEY DON'T GET THE REAL NEWS. THEY GET THE BULLSHIT NEWS THAT YOU EAT UP....

i would have had more respect for him had he said that he was against war for personal reasons. but he didnt he gave some bullshit excuse that all the anit-war guys are using. he has also signed all those anti-war ads that were run in newspapers. thats ads were anti-bush ads not anti-war ads "IN MY OPINION"
LOL, how do you know his stance is anything but personal reasons? What "bullshit" everything he said was correct... So what if he signed "anti-war" adds? He's taking a stance just as your taking a stance for "PRO-war".... How do you figure their just "anti-bush" and not "anti-war"? he's OBVIOUSLY against war, and if bush is the one pushing for it, he's OBVIOUSLY gonna be against Bush. you say "anti-bush" like its a bad thing, ROFL...

i remember Clinton acting calm like a gentleman when he went before the nation and said "i did not have sexual relations with that woman monica lewinski" and lied to our faces,
I'd rather a President lie about getting a blowjob than murdering people in other countries...
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
115
#25
if what we're about to do is murder then you can say that bill clinton was murdering people WHILE lying about getting his dick sucked.
 
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#26
I'm not saying what we are about to do, I'm sayin what we have DONE under presidents like George Bush Sr and Reagan in regards to secret CIA operations in other countries as well as the training of Para Military Forces who killed families in other countries to create terror and opress the people for US interest........
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#27
Snubnoze said:
He's taking a stance just as your taking a stance for "PRO-war"....
who ever said that i am pro-war???

i dont think that any rational person wants a war. wars are ugly and lives are lost (even innocents). war is the last option. but it should always be an option.

i am anti-sadam wether it be him going into exile, disarming, or by force.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#28
Snubnoze said:
I'm not saying what we are about to do, I'm sayin what we have DONE under presidents like George Bush Sr and Reagan in regards to secret CIA operations in other countries as well as the training of Para Military Forces who killed families in other countries to create terror and opress the people for US interest........
you say that as if clinton, carter, kennedy and johnson have never done anything wrong.

because of carters weakness hostages were taken under his watch. he fucked up the economy BIG_TIME

under clinton he bold face lied to the country over a bitch, obstructed justice(this sounds like alote worse than what Nixon did), (who knows how many of those suicides related to whitewater were not suicides), he gave unreasonably pardons to FBI most wanted. he AXED the military and the CIA. he turned down 2 offers to hand deliver Osama bin Laden to him. he and carter gave N. Korea the nukes they have today.

bush41 was a decent president.

and Reagan will go down as one of the best president this country has ever had
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#29
phil said:
if what we're about to do is murder then you can say that bill clinton was murdering people WHILE lying about getting his dick sucked.
Clinton launched more cruise missiles at Iraq during his impeachment trial than were launched in the entire Gulf War.
yet i dont recall seeing any protesters.

that is why i say most of the protestort are anti-bush not anti-war
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
115
#30
you hit it on the head mclean. anti bush. you didnt see any protesters in bosnia either. not a fuckin one. they were all too busy spreading the news of the vast right wing conspiracy.
 
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#31
Ya thats It, everything is partison politics ROFLMAO. You think all these protesters out there are running for office? Keep eating up what the media tells you sheep....
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#32
yes,^^^ they are upset that republicans control 3 0f 4 brances of government.

but thats ok with me i think all that protesting is going to backfire in their faces after the war begins, WMD are found and destroyed, we are sucessful, and bush wins another tern in the oval office
 
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#33
LOL, whether they have WMD or not doesn't matter because what do you think bush will do if he finishes off the war and finds nothing? That would be political suicide, he's obviously gonna plant something. Would you atleast agree if they found nothing they would plant something? Its a no brainer...
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#34
Snubnoze said:
LOL, whether they have WMD or not doesn't matter because what do you think bush will do if he finishes off the war and finds nothing?
he has WMD destruction. that is a fact.

Snubnoze said:
Would you atleast agree if they found nothing they would plant something? Its a no brainer...
maybe i dont know.

Snubnoze said:
Would you atleast agree if they found nothing they would plant something? Its a no brainer...
can i assume by that statement that when they do find the weapons you wont believe them??? and that you have already made up your mind that when they show the confiscated WMD they would have been planted???
 
May 5, 2002
2,241
4
0
#35
he has WMD destruction. that is a fact.
WHERE ARE THEY!?

YOU'VE already made up your mind that they do....

Do I think theirs a posiblity that he has some? Sure theirs a possiblity, But I don't think he's gonna USE any. He's contained like a motherfucker right now he'd be stupid to try somethin.... now if we start a war tho, he got nothin to loose, so bombs away!