M-PHIVE said:
I AGREE, ALL THESE CATS TALKIN SHIT WOULD HAVE STILL BOUGHT IT IPH IT WAS ONLY 13 TRACS ALL NEW, WITH NO COMPLAINTS OPH IT BEING ONLY 13 TRACS, THEY LOOKIN AT IT THE WRONG WAY...ABA
First of all, listeners expressing their opinions and complaints isn't "TALKIN SHIT". Secondly, I don't give a fuck how you try to, you
can not justify recycling. There is NO valid excuse for it. When people buy a cd, they expect new music, how the fuck do you think that is "LOOKIN AT IT THE WRONG WAY?" You got that backwards, you're the one looking at it the wrong way.
That's neat-o that there are 13 new songs. But it's a 19 track cd, there should be 19 new songs. One of the biggest complaints about bay area rap
is all the recycling. Why do you think people arn't putting "13 NEW SONGS, 6 OLD SONGS" on their album covers? How about "19 TRACKS, 13 NEW SONGS & 6 I DIDN'T FEEL GOT ENOUGH EXPOSURE".
Everybody is entitled to their own opinion and mine isn't going to change. If I buy a 19 piece chicken dinner and 6 of those pieces are already chewed, fuck no you can't justify that. I could care less if 13
are fresh and new. I EXPECT all 19 to be.
I don't respect and won't respect recycling. If you want to sell old music then make a 'greatest hits' album (even though I doubt that title would be appropriate). Whatever you do, just don't try to sell me your recycled bullshit under a new name.