Oh Coy!Ocerto said:
I think he was referring to the fact that...for SUCH a large plane and crash...the debris was still very little...and he even showed SIMILAR crashes where you could seeplenty of debris and even the outter casing of a large plane
And he was saying that the wings and top wing in the rear would ALSO leave marks...enough to make MORE than must a 16 foot hole...i would like you to prove this...as he proved his facts by backing of experts...
And did you see the LAST hole it left?Round...he explained how the TIP of a plane...is the FIRST to go in a crassh...its the softest part of the plane...even softer then the TIRES....yet the hole looks like it was "pierced"
You have to remember the Pentagon was built during WWII on the cheap when steel and other premium building materials were in short supply. Although they just happened to hit the side which was reinforced. Here's a couple links to videos of a F4 fighter crashing into concrete.
link1
link2
link3
link4
Here's a thread on another site which goes in depth into anaylising the 'evidence' at the Pentagon and concludes with a 757 hitting it.
Here's another thread from the same site against a 757 hitting the Pentagon.
I'm still in the I'm not quite sure either way but something ain't right and I know the gov is behind it phase. I still believe the whole Pentagon issue is a honeypot. Which I why I think people ought to focus on the WTC collapses where there is a abundance of evidence.
Either argument I think is moot. Both sides are using "evidence" they obtained from major media which is admittadly controlled by the CIA. And the most highly protected airspace and building were attacked and NO ONE was fired. Either way there is government complicity. The argument serves to distract.
Didnt he document that a flight 93 landed in Cleveland that day?I coulds sworn it even showed it on some airflight document from the AIRPORT
Again...he said that 2 planes landed within 30 minutes of eachother..one took 30 minutes to evacuate(flight 93)...and an hour and a half (Delta 89)...he also notes later inthe film that the 2 planes in the Tower crashes were logged as "destroyed" on flight sheets...but 93 and 11 were listed as something else....as they are still intact AND flying..
Yes 2 flights landed in cleavland. All I see is a wild opinion with no facts to back it up. And I believe I read just in the last week (I think on whatreallyhapped.com) where this specific claim was proven false. All passengers were accounted for from both flights. Now the claim about 2 of the planes not being listed as destroyed until last year was interesting. But it could be a clerical error. But being that all four were so infamous that seems hard to believe.
I found this a bit strange as well...but maybe the explsion had something to do with the carrying away of 320 Billion dollars in gold by a "unmarked covered truck"...
Could be, but I thought the gold was under 8 WTC, but I could be wrong on that. If you wanna hear a really crazy theory the guy behind the 9/11 eyewitness film claims a thermonuclear bomb was used! Kinda complete BS since WTC 1, 2 & 7 came straight down from the top. And radiation would've been detected in the US, UK and EU
but i think my memory stands correct because those things you mentioned were the most shocking....
Remeber just because they're shocking doesn't mean they're true...or false for that matter. In this age with the excellent MiniDV camera and cheap computers/software it is much cheaper and easier to produce a film. Which means you have to scrutinize them much more. Also remember TV and Film are the #1 tool used to form opinion and spread propaganda. I bet half the time you don't even know when you're seeing it. But once you learn what to look for it just jumps off the screen at you.
BTW...im watching the Ruppert speech now....i luv how this guy is exposing the drug/economy thing...something ive been preaching for many moons...its no secret....
FYI he's the guy who first broke the CIA/LAPD/Iran Contra/Crack connection. Along with Gary Webb 20 years later. If you go to
GNN and watch their short on the CIA crack connection 'Crack the CIA' he's in that as well.