Kissinger

[Mcleanhatch]

Mcleanhatch If Kissinger did those things he did to Cambodia, Bangledesh, Vietnam, Chile, East Timor, but in Mexico would you still support him?

TonganSaV let me put it this way. i am an american first and always will be.

 

[Mcleanhatch]

Mcleanhatch If Kissinger did those things he did to Cambodia, Bangledesh, Vietnam, Chile, East Timor, but in Mexico would you still support him?

did you check out the link that i posted earlier. because i find that other link that 2-0-sixx posted as very bias. i mean read the wwwaddress

 

[nefar559]

did you check out the link that i posted earlier. because i find that other link that 2-0-sixx posted as very bias. i mean read the wwwaddress

but if the information is true...its still bias?

 

[nefar559]

TonganSaV let me put it this way. i am an american first and always will be.

apparently u'r anestors weren't patriotic to mexico.

 

[Mcleanhatch]

apparently u'r anestors weren't patriotic to mexico.

both my parents and born and raised patriotic americans, 3 of my grandparents were born and raised american patriots, and my lone grandfather that was born in Mexico came to america LEGALLY when he was merely 3 years old, became a citizin and fought for America in WWII. does that answer your question???????

 

[Mcleanhatch]

but if the information is true...its still bias?

if the writer is bias that his material has a high chance of being tainted. compared to the link that i posted that came from a Central down the middle author.

 

[nefar559]

both my parents and born and raised patriotic americans, 3 of my grandparents were born and raised american patriots, and my lone grandfather that was born in Mexico came to america LEGALLY when he was merely 3 years old, became a citizin and fought for America in WWII. does that answer your question???????

somewhere down the line u'r roots show up in mexico...since
you'r ethnicity is mexican right?
neither way, they weren't patriots of that country.

 

[nefar559]

if the writer is bias that his material has a high chance of being tainted. compared to the link that i posted that came from a Central down the middle author.

you said "if" the writer is bias...still doesn't prove the site is bias.

just cuase they in the center doesn't mean they can't be bias.

 

[Mcleanhatch]

somewhere down the line u'r roots show up in mexico...since
you'r ethnicity is mexican right?
neither way, they weren't patriots of that country.

of course i am of mexican decent.....

but i am only an american where it boils down to it. and so were they the day they left mexico to come to america

 

[Mcleanhatch]

you said "if" the writer is bias...still doesn't prove the site is bias.

just cuase they in the center doesn't mean they can't be bias.

the www adress is called www.trialofhenrykissenger.

what if i posted a webpage called

www.nefar559theultimateliberalthatsacommunist.com do you think that it will be fair ( maybe if fair means fair as in FAIR.org) lol

 

[nefar559]

the www adress is called www.trialofhenrykissenger.

what if i posted a webpage called

www.nefar559theultimateliberalthatsacommunist.com do you think that it will be fair ( maybe if fair means fair as in FAIR.org) lol

lol, still doesn't prove anything.....u'r logic...lol...what logic!?..lol

just cuase its trialofhenrykissenger.com doesn't mean its bias.
if the facts stack up against him, then its not bias.

 

[Mcleanhatch]

just cuase its trialofhenrykissenger.com doesn't mean its bias.
if the facts stack up against him, then its not bias.

1. was he ever tried?

if no then it just makes him look bad for no reason

if yes? then was he found guilty.

 

[nefar559]

1. was he ever tried?

if no then it just makes him look bad for no reason

if yes? then was he found guilty.

if the facts stack up against him, then its not bias.

 

[Mcleanhatch]

i just gonna throw the towl in on this one it isnt important anyway.

all i was saying is consider the chance the source could be bias. the same way you say the mainstream media is bias.

 

[nefar559]

i just gonna throw the towl in on this one it isnt important anyway.

all i was saying is consider the chance the source could be bias. the same way you say the mainstream media is bias.

yea, but time and after time, i post articles that prove that.
unlike you, you tell us it "could" be bias.

so its not the same way.

 

[Mcleanhatch]

yea, but time and after time, i post articles that prove that.
unlike you, you tell us it "could" be bias.

so its not the same way.

i watch the news on T.V. i cant come and post my television on here. and i tell you it could/is bias because i hear otherwise on the cable channels, who in turn are for the most part neutral or a bit to the left, while most of your sources are wayyyyy far to the left.

 

[nefar559]

i watch the news on T.V.

enough said

 

[ToNgAn_SaV]

TonganSaV let me put it this way. i am an american first and always will be.

Alright coo'. Just asking out of curiousity, and no other reason.

did you check out the link that i posted earlier. because i find that other link that 2-0-sixx posted as very bias. i mean read the wwwaddress

No, I didn't.

If a website has a bio with ALL his accomplishments with out mentioning ALL his fuck ups, then that's SUSPECT!

If a website has a bio with ALL his Fuck ups with out mentioning ALL his accomplishments, then that's SUSPECT!

I waste no time with any of that.

 

[Mcleanhatch]

If a website has a bio with ALL his accomplishments with out mentioning ALL his fuck ups, then that's SUSPECT!

If a website has a bio with ALL his Fuck ups with out mentioning ALL his accomplishments, then that's SUSPECT!

I waste no time with any of that.

as i said earlier i posted a fair article that talks about both his accompishments and his fuck-ups im not going to post some bias bullshit. if you got time check it out

 

[StillHustlin]

LMAO

Kissinger & your boy Putin are buddies.

OOPS.GOV/WORLDORDER

:dead: