JEFF HARDY UPDATE

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Oct 3, 2006
5,631
1,842
113
39
#41
yeah i dont think taker would win the belt if he did it would be for a short run...his career is more to just push younger talent now
 
Nov 14, 2002
15,455
537
113
41
#42
They defend the tittle too much thats why the champ always gets hurt. They should do it like back in the days where the world champ only defends the belt at ppvs(since theres one every month) only instead of defending it at every house shows and weekly shows. Thats what makes the belts more prestiges and champs more powerful
I keep hearing people say this, but if your champ never fought then what's the point of having him as the champ at all? I doubt you'd be on here talking about how great WWE was if Randy Orton just carried the belt around and only wrestled once a month at a PPV. The end result of that is a guy with a belt that you only see for run-ins...
 
Nov 14, 2002
15,455
537
113
41
#44
To the best of my knowledge, Randy Orton never lost the belt on TV so I don't know what the difference would be. I get your point but i think that at this point in time if they started holding back their champs people would be doing more complaining about it than they are now.
 
Jan 2, 2004
3,168
2
0
39
#45
They need to do shit like the old days where you actually thought there was a chance that the champion would lose a belt on Raw and not only at a PPV.. They may defend it all the time on Raw and everything, but when was the last time there was actually a world title switch on Raw?
 
May 6, 2009
2,506
617
0
42
#47
They need to do shit like the old days where you actually thought there was a chance that the champion would lose a belt on Raw and not only at a PPV.. They may defend it all the time on Raw and everything, but when was the last time there was actually a world title switch on Raw?
I completely agree. Been thinking the same thing for a long time. Shits becoming too predictable. Never any surprises like the old days.
 
Nov 14, 2002
15,455
537
113
41
#48
I def didn't see that RKO coming on Dusty Rhodes the other week. Lol.

I think I've been more surprised with the results of Hells Kitchen than I have been with wrestling lately.
 
Feb 8, 2003
22,839
1,850
0
#49
To the best of my knowledge, Randy Orton never lost the belt on TV so I don't know what the difference would be. I get your point but i think that at this point in time if they started holding back their champs people would be doing more complaining about it than they are now.
Unless they do what they did with bret, hbk, yoko back in the days and have them just defend the belt against midcarders on television bc it will also help build the midcarder up at the same time.

Dont get me wrong Orton is a good champ(im glad he got it and not HHH) i like him better now since he stepped it up and won the strap but they should have him drop to a new face right now for atleast a month or two i wouldnt mind seeing mark henry, cena or kofi with the belt for a lil bit.


I got a feeling though either rhodes or dibease gonna have a big push coming soon when they split they group up also I wonder what tehy gonna do with teh other dibease son..
 
Nov 14, 2002
15,455
537
113
41
#52
Unless they do what they did with bret, hbk, yoko back in the days and have them just defend the belt against midcarders on television bc it will also help build the midcarder up at the same time.
Those people weren't even mid-card wrestlers. They were all developmental jobbers and that was a completely different time in wrestling. I would not watch that product at all.

they should have him drop to a new face right now for atleast a month or two i wouldnt mind seeing mark henry, cena or kofi with the belt for a lil bit.
Wow I hate all those people. Maybe MVP or some shit.

I thought taht was pointless they did that unless they was gonna have cody turn face bc of it. but they didnt.
They will. Or maybe not... Isn't it Debiasi that has the movie coming out?

When in doubt, RKO seems to be the best policy these days.
 
Jan 2, 2004
3,168
2
0
39
#53
a few months ago when orton beat HHH & big show in that triple threat match to get the belt on that raw 3 hr show
That wasn't really a title switch though.. There was no champion since Batista got hurt and couldn't lose it, so they decided to be nice and give the title away at a Raw.. But its not like there was a surprise title switch there.
 
Feb 8, 2003
22,839
1,850
0
#55
Those people weren't even mid-card wrestlers. They were all developmental jobbers and that was a completely different time in wrestling. I would not watch that product at all.



Im not talking about the jobbers on superstars of wrestling. Im talking about when they had for example Bret Hart defend the belt against crush, doink or hbk defend against gold dust or yoko defend against savage on raw.