Jackson not guilty- whats your reactions.
- Thread starter Rob S4
- Start date
MEDIA HYPE?
THE DUDE ADMITTED SHARING HIS BED WITH LITTLE BOYS. DID YOU SEE THE DOCUMENTARY WITH HIM AND THE LITTLE BOY HOLDING HANDS?
IT WOULD BE ONE THING IF THIS WAS AN ISOLATED INCIDENT. IT'S NOT. REMEMBER THE SETTLEMENT HE MADE BACK IN THE 90'S? WAS HE INNOCENT THEN TOO? MILLIONS OF DOLLARS THAT SICK FUCK PAID TO DUCK THE LAW. THE ONLY REASON HE DIDN'T PAY THAT OUT TO SWEEP THIS CASE UNDER THE RUG IS HE PROBABLY CAN'T AFFORD TO NOW.
OPEN YOUR EYES.
AND MY BAD FOR CALLING YOU HOMIE.
LOL.
THE DUDE ADMITTED SHARING HIS BED WITH LITTLE BOYS. DID YOU SEE THE DOCUMENTARY WITH HIM AND THE LITTLE BOY HOLDING HANDS?
IT WOULD BE ONE THING IF THIS WAS AN ISOLATED INCIDENT. IT'S NOT. REMEMBER THE SETTLEMENT HE MADE BACK IN THE 90'S? WAS HE INNOCENT THEN TOO? MILLIONS OF DOLLARS THAT SICK FUCK PAID TO DUCK THE LAW. THE ONLY REASON HE DIDN'T PAY THAT OUT TO SWEEP THIS CASE UNDER THE RUG IS HE PROBABLY CAN'T AFFORD TO NOW.
OPEN YOUR EYES.
AND MY BAD FOR CALLING YOU HOMIE.
LOL.
SOLITARY 1,
YOU STRESSED, "MEDIA HYPE?"
YUP. LOOK AT YOUR OWN WORDS, "DID YOU SEE THE DOCUMENTARY WITH HIM AND THE LITTLE BOY HOLDING HANDS?"
THEN YOU STRESSED, "DID YOU SEE THE DOCUMENTARY WITH HIM AND THE LITTLE BOY HOLDING HANDS?"
AND?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "IT WOULD BE ONE THING IF THIS WAS AN ISOLATED INCIDENT. IT'S NOT."
SO YOU SAYIN' THAT HE WAS "HOLDIN' HANDS" WITH A LIL BOY MORE THAN ONE TIME? AND THAT'S A CRIME? THAT'S SEXUAL? MIKE IS WEIRD AND NAIVE. THAT'S ALL. YOU JUDgIN' HIM. WHO MADE YOU (gOD)?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "REMEMBER THE SETTLEMENT HE MADE BACK IN THE 90'S? WAS HE INNOCENT THEN TOO?"
HE DIDN'T WANT THE BAD PUBLICITY, DON'T MAKE HIM gUILTY. THE SAME D.A HAD YOUR LOgIC AND COULDN'T PROVE SHIT. SO WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THAT THE SAME DA DOESN'T? WHAT MAKES YOU BETTER THAN THE D.A AND THEY gOT A DEgREE AND EXPERIENCE IN THAT SHIT?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "MILLIONS OF DOLLARS THAT SICK FUCK PAID TO DUCK THE LAW. THE ONLY REASON HE DIDN'T PAY THAT OUT TO SWEEP THIS CASE UNDER THE RUG IS HE PROBABLY CAN'T AFFORD TO NOW."
CONgRATULATE, DON'T HATE. IN OTHA WORDS, THIS MAN QUIT RUNNIN' AWAY FROM HIS DEMONS, FACED THEM AND WON. THE ONLY THANg IS THAT YOU gOT JUDgEMENTAL PEOPLE LIKE YOU THAT HAS A PERCEPTION OF HIM AND DON'T EVEN KNOW HIM BUT JUST THE PERSONA THE MEDIA MADE HIM OUT TO BE. TO YOU HE'S JAKO WAKO. AND THAT'S IT. DON'T MATTER IF HIS INNOCENCE WAS PROVEN.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "OPEN YOUR EYES."
PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH, OR SHOULD I SAY DON'T SUggEST SOMETHIN' YOU AIN'T DOIN'.
YOU STRESSED, "MEDIA HYPE?"
YUP. LOOK AT YOUR OWN WORDS, "DID YOU SEE THE DOCUMENTARY WITH HIM AND THE LITTLE BOY HOLDING HANDS?"
THEN YOU STRESSED, "DID YOU SEE THE DOCUMENTARY WITH HIM AND THE LITTLE BOY HOLDING HANDS?"
AND?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "IT WOULD BE ONE THING IF THIS WAS AN ISOLATED INCIDENT. IT'S NOT."
SO YOU SAYIN' THAT HE WAS "HOLDIN' HANDS" WITH A LIL BOY MORE THAN ONE TIME? AND THAT'S A CRIME? THAT'S SEXUAL? MIKE IS WEIRD AND NAIVE. THAT'S ALL. YOU JUDgIN' HIM. WHO MADE YOU (gOD)?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "REMEMBER THE SETTLEMENT HE MADE BACK IN THE 90'S? WAS HE INNOCENT THEN TOO?"
HE DIDN'T WANT THE BAD PUBLICITY, DON'T MAKE HIM gUILTY. THE SAME D.A HAD YOUR LOgIC AND COULDN'T PROVE SHIT. SO WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE THAT THE SAME DA DOESN'T? WHAT MAKES YOU BETTER THAN THE D.A AND THEY gOT A DEgREE AND EXPERIENCE IN THAT SHIT?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "MILLIONS OF DOLLARS THAT SICK FUCK PAID TO DUCK THE LAW. THE ONLY REASON HE DIDN'T PAY THAT OUT TO SWEEP THIS CASE UNDER THE RUG IS HE PROBABLY CAN'T AFFORD TO NOW."
CONgRATULATE, DON'T HATE. IN OTHA WORDS, THIS MAN QUIT RUNNIN' AWAY FROM HIS DEMONS, FACED THEM AND WON. THE ONLY THANg IS THAT YOU gOT JUDgEMENTAL PEOPLE LIKE YOU THAT HAS A PERCEPTION OF HIM AND DON'T EVEN KNOW HIM BUT JUST THE PERSONA THE MEDIA MADE HIM OUT TO BE. TO YOU HE'S JAKO WAKO. AND THAT'S IT. DON'T MATTER IF HIS INNOCENCE WAS PROVEN.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "OPEN YOUR EYES."
PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH, OR SHOULD I SAY DON'T SUggEST SOMETHIN' YOU AIN'T DOIN'.
Why is everyone suprised?!!! HE DIDN"T DO SHIT! Most of you get your information from the same sources that are trying to take jackson out...
GRANTED
He put himself in harms way talking and acting the way he does, BUT THAT DON'T MAKE HIM A MOLESTER.
PLUS
WHERE WAS THE HUGE CATHOLIC PRIEST TRIAL AND 24/7 COVERAGE ON COURT TV?!?!
The medias controlling alot of your perceptions
GRANTED
He put himself in harms way talking and acting the way he does, BUT THAT DON'T MAKE HIM A MOLESTER.
PLUS
WHERE WAS THE HUGE CATHOLIC PRIEST TRIAL AND 24/7 COVERAGE ON COURT TV?!?!
The medias controlling alot of your perceptions
No,I don't believe a word the media says nowadays.BUT I'M POSITIVE HE'S A CHILMO!!!Too much smoke for there not be a fire.I have to admitt that I agree with the jury,there just wasn't enough EVIDENCE.And about the catholic preists,hmmmmmmm...I wonder how somebody could accuse someone of molesting them 20-30 years ago and have EVIDENCE????Hmmmm,now I'm not catholic,but I am a SKEPTIC.You must be bigoted against christians,just excepting shit.Like I said,Neither one of us were there so we don't know.
I used to priests as an example, because in my opinion, if the same amount of coverage and media frenzy would've surrounded the priests, and everyone on tv villified priests, then most people would probably write catholic priests off as child molesters.
Well, if you weren't molested by Micheal Jackson, what right do you have to call him a child molester?
As I said, I used the comparison strictly to make my point. But this does bring up an interesting thought; if what I said could be used against me (you labeled me a bigot) then calling someone a child molester that you don't know, have never met, and know nothing about could be considered prejudice and ignorant.
Well, if you weren't molested by Micheal Jackson, what right do you have to call him a child molester?
As I said, I used the comparison strictly to make my point. But this does bring up an interesting thought; if what I said could be used against me (you labeled me a bigot) then calling someone a child molester that you don't know, have never met, and know nothing about could be considered prejudice and ignorant.
I guess your right on that...but even a JUROR admitted he is POSITIVE he's a molester!!!The evidence just wasn't there even though they found a picture book of naked li'l boys at his HOME(THAT I BELIEVE!!).I'm surprised that they didn't charge him with that being it's a crime.Anyways I apologize for assuming you were bigoted towards Christians.But I still think he's a chomo.
yeah mjs weird but half the guys who are aganist him are only doing it cus its a trend, if a crowd of 6 is tellin mj jokes not very many people are gonna oppose the idea, IF someone says "maybe hes not guilty" hte majority of people are like 'wtf are you insane' but most people dont even put thought into it
