ITS ON O'Reilly VS MOORE tomorrow on the factor

[nefar559]

CIA has been in shambles for years, not to mention we got intill from 3 different country's about Iraq's WMD, which will be found shortly.

CIA on October 10, 2002, stated that Iraq wasnt not a threat to the US ... a few months later with White House pressure, guess what they said?

 

[m.w.merlino]

if a toy kills a kid, and the ceo of mattel claims that his safety department told him it was safe, AND tyco's safety department told him it was ok, but no one ever tests the toy and it kills someone, its the ceo's fault and he would be considered a liar.

 

[DaytonFamily]

if a toy kills a kid, and the ceo of mattel claims that his safety department told him it was safe, AND tyco's safety department told him it was ok, but no one ever tests the toy and it kills someone, its the ceo's fault and he would be considered a liar.

Ok

 

[WHITE DEVIL]

I wanted Moore to fuck O'Reilly up, even though I'm not a big Moore fan. Admittedly, though, Moore came with some weak shit to counter O'Reilly's points...and O'Reilly didn't really hit moore that hard.

I'd say O'Reilly won, but just barely. It was not a clear victory on any side. The debate was Iraq; We kinda won the war, though it will never be over, just as neither O'Reilly nor Moore got their ass beat.

 

[jay deuce]

The only real point I think Moore made was that the President needs to fucking apologize to the nation. Something that he will never do.

 

[tadou]

Did Clinton ever fully apologize for what he did? Without saying "Ken Starr did this" and so on? I think not. Clinton was a proven liar....Bush is only a liar based on opinion.

There is no need to apologize for anything. 5 separate, independent nations with their own independent intelligencia, all said Iraq posessed WMDs. No pre-war intelligence yet has shown anything to the contrary.

 

[DaytonFamily]

LOL.....DAMN MAN WHY EVEN ARGUE YOU WIT YOU???? O REILLY COULD ADMIT HE LOST THE ARGUMENT HIMSELF AND YOU WOULD STILL SAY HE WON I BET... BUSH COULD SAY "I LIED" AND YOUD STILL SAY BUSH WAS RIGHT..... :dead:

Your right, dont argue with me cause its impossible to beat me.

 

[DaytonFamily]

Did Clinton ever fully apologize for what he did? Without saying "Ken Starr did this" and so on? I think not. Clinton was a proven liar....Bush is only a liar based on opinion.

There is no need to apologize for anything. 5 separate, independent nations with their own independent intelligencia, all said Iraq posessed WMDs. No pre-war intelligence yet has shown anything to the contrary.

Shhhhhh no one wants to hear that about Clinton. Not to mention his bigest blunder was not taking Bin Laden into custody when Saudi Arabia offered him to us.

 

[nefar559]

Did Clinton ever fully apologize for what he did? Without saying "Ken Starr did this" and so on? I think not. Clinton was a proven liar....Bush is only a liar based on opinion.

There is no need to apologize for anything. 5 separate, independent nations with their own independent intelligencia, all said Iraq posessed WMDs. No pre-war intelligence yet has shown anything to the contrary.

lol waht do we have here, Little O'Reilly Junior? why you bring up your idol clinton? this is about Bush, and his lies. that took us to war on a false base, to a country that has nothing to with 9/11 ... but at least it has the 2nd largest oil reverses....

 

[DaytonFamily]

lol waht do we have here, Little O'Reilly Junior? why you bring up your idol clinton? this is about Bush, and his lies. that took us to war on a false base, to a country that has nothing to with 9/11 ... but at least it has the 2nd largest oil reverses....

1.Iraq was a threat to world peace
2. Sadaam and his brothers were homicidal manics
3. They killed countless innocent people
4. They had access to WMD in the past and were known to have them now
5. This was not about oil, drop that shit already
6. We still have the chance to find WMD there so its not a false base

 

[Contagious Locc]

There is no need to apologize for anything. 5 separate, independent nations with their own independent intelligencia, all said Iraq posessed WMDs. No pre-war intelligence yet has shown anything to the contrary.

MAN WHO GIVES A FUCC. INTELLIGENCE AIN'T SHIT WITHOUT EVIDENCE. I HAVEN'T SEEN ANY WMD RECOVERED YET. YOU GUYS ARE MISSING THE POINT... THE KEY WORD HERE IS "EVIDENCE" NOT INTELLIGENCE. IF 5 DIFFERENT PEOPLE POINTED ME OUT IN A LINE UP DETECTIVES WOULD STILL HAVE TO HAVE "PHYSICAL EVIDENCE" IN ORDER TO CONVICT ME OF THE CRIME. IF WE JUST WENT OFF WHAT SOMEONE SAID, OR IN THIS CASE INTELLIGENCE, WITHOUT INVESTIGATING WHETHER OR NOT THE INFORMATION IS TRUE THIS WORLD WOULD BE SHIT. I DON'T SEE WHY YALL DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS...IT'S PRETTY CUT AND DRY... BUSH HAD NO EVIDENCE OF WMD BUT HE STILL INVADED IRAQ... DAMN..

 

[DaytonFamily]

MAN WHO GIVES A FUCC. INTELLIGENCE AIN'T SHIT WITHOUT EVIDENCE. I HAVEN'T SEEN ANY WMD RECOVERED YET. YOU GUYS ARE MISSING THE POINT... THE KEY WORD HERE IS "EVIDENCE" NOT INTELLIGENCE. IF 5 DIFFERENT PEOPLE POINTED ME OUT IN A LINE UP DETECTIVES WOULD STILL HAVE TO HAVE "PHYSICAL EVIDENCE" IN ORDER TO CONVICT ME OF THE CRIME. IF WE JUST WENT OFF WHAT SOMEONE SAID, OR IN THIS CASE INTELLIGENCE, WITHOUT INVESTIGATING WHETHER OR NOT THE INFORMATION IS TRUE THIS WORLD WOULD BE SHIT. I DON'T SEE WHY YALL DON'T UNDERSTAND THIS...IT'S PRETTY CUT AND DRY... BUSH HAD NO EVIDENCE OF WMD BUT HE STILL INVADED IRAQ... DAMN..

Read my above post for enough reason to invade Iraq.

 

[nefar559]

1.Iraq was a threat to world peace
2. Sadaam and his brothers were homicidal manics
3. They killed countless innocent people
4. They had access to WMD in the past and were known to have them now
5. This was not about oil, drop that shit already
6. We still have the chance to find WMD there so its not a false base

1. yea saddam's 3rd world shit hole country was on the verge to world domination.

2. LOL, ok, we have tons of countries in this day of time doing the same shit, why did we choose iraq? oil oil oil

3. see 2

4. what was the UN inpectors doing during the 90s? clearing out weapons, thats what. Why was clinton bombing iraq? bombing WMD, thats what. What was Hans Blix saying before the war? IRAQ doesnt have WMDs. get a better argument, (that means go listen to bush)

5. LOL, ok "it was all about the WMDs"...LOL

6. the Bush admin said iraq had them, how did they know they had them? shouldnt they have known? i mean what the fuck was Collin Powel doing with them ariel pictures of iraq at the UN before the war? wasn't he showning the world that iraq had WMDs? u know what those pictures were actually showning? hint..not WMDs...lol

 

[Mcleanhatch]

Shhhhhh no one wants to hear that about Clinton. Not to mention his bigest blunder was not taking Bin Laden into custody when Saudi Arabia offered him to us.

or when Sudan basically said, here he is come get him.

 

[Mcleanhatch]

IF 5 DIFFERENT PEOPLE POINTED ME OUT IN A LINE UP DETECTIVES WOULD STILL HAVE TO HAVE "PHYSICAL EVIDENCE" IN ORDER TO CONVICT ME OF THE CRIME...

not really. its called circumstantial and it is used all the time

 

[Mcleanhatch]

1. yea saddam's 3rd world shit hole country was on the verge to world domination.

he didnt say that, he said "Iraq was a threat to world peace"

2. LOL, ok, we have tons of countries in this day of time doing the same shit, why did we choose iraq? oil oil oil

Originally Posted by DaytonFamily
1.Iraq was a threat to world peace
2. Sadaam and his brothers were homicidal manics
3. They killed countless innocent people
4. They had access to WMD in the past and were known to have them now

 

[L Mac-a-docious]

1.Iraq was a threat to world peace
2. Sadaam and his brothers were homicidal manics
3. They killed countless innocent people
4. They had access to WMD in the past and were known to have them now
5. This was not about oil, drop that shit already
6. We still have the chance to find WMD there so its not a false base

1. Bush started a war based on "bad intel."
2. Bush, and his cabinet are homicidal maniacs.
3. They killed countless innocent Iraqis.
4. They have access to WMD right now.
5. Haliburton, Enron, Exxon, Cheveron, Texaco, OIL ya fuckin dipstick.
6. "I thought that the intelligence I was getting was good intelligence."

-Get a fucking clue...your boy is twisting in the wind. :dead:

 

[jay deuce]

1.Iraq was a threat to world peace

No it was't. Bush is a threat to world peace.

2. Sadaam and his brothers were homicidal manics

Agreed.

3. They killed countless innocent people

Stop trying to make it like you have more points and combine this with 2.

4. They had access to WMD in the past and were known to have them now

WOW you never give up. When are we going to find them?

5. This was not about oil, drop that shit already

You're right. It was about Haliburton getting the no bid contract for this planned war AND oil AND for Cowboy Dumbya to get back at that mean ol Saddaam for attackin his paw. Sorry for the mixup you had.

6. We still have the chance to find WMD there so its not a false base

Shutup and combin this with 4. Jackass

 

[DaytonFamily]

Anyone watching the follow up segment on yesterdays interview?

 

[DaytonFamily]

1. Bush started a war based on "bad intel."
2. Bush, and his cabinet are homicidal maniacs.
3. They killed countless innocent Iraqis.
4. They have access to WMD right now.
5. Haliburton, Enron, Exxon, Cheveron, Texaco, OIL ya fuckin dipstick.
6. "I thought that the intelligence I was getting was good intelligence."

-Get a fucking clue...your boy is twisting in the wind. :dead:

1. More than that
2. No now u need the clue
3. Thats what happens in war, Clinton didnt have a clean slate
3b. Sadaam killed more than we have and would of continued too.
3c. terrorists have killed them too
4. Considering were not a brutal regime, and we wouldnt use them unless struck with them first, I feel safe.
5. And?
6. Clinton would of acted on this too