Iran Threatens To Destroy Dimona Nuclear Reactor

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
2,856
0
0
41
www.Tadou.com
#21
A1Yola415 said:
iran has some of the most advanced technology in the world when it comes to weapons, they could easily take out all the aircraft carriers in the gulf and basically blow up every US military base in iraq, and ever since ww2, no country has tried to obliterate another country, u know how the US works, occuppy and set up a puppet gov;t
Your memory must be really short. In the opening days of the war, the Iraqi government was PISSED that we obliterated them. They kept calling on us to "fight them on the ground"(paraphrase)

I mean, for fucking goodness sakes, you act like Iran's anti-missle technology even comes REMOTELY CLOSE to our aircraft technology. Even the weapons Iraq bought with corrupt French/German/Russian Oil for Food money, were no use. Most of the planes that went down, went down from small arms fire.

You really are on one.
 
Jun 24, 2004
2,268
0
0
38
#22
A1Yola415 said:
iran has some of the most advanced technology in the world when it comes to weapons, they could easily take out all the aircraft carriers in the gulf and basically blow up every US military base in iraq, and ever since ww2, no country has tried to obliterate another country, u know how the US works, occuppy and set up a puppet gov;t


Whos side our you on? And btw your making Iran out to be a bit too powerful, there are reasons why some country's are called super powers, they either have the tech or man power to back it up. Iran has none. They wouldnt be a pushover, but there not gonna stand head to head with us.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,856
0
0
41
www.Tadou.com
#23
Indeed. Having 500,000 soldiers means nothing when your technology is shit. And against Iran, it would be almost all desert combat anyways. Obviously, our weakness in Viet Nam and the reason we "lost" was because it was a jungle war, one we're not used to.

I swear, some of you act like this is Medieval Europe or Rome all over again, and we're fighting with swords and Greek fire.
 
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
42
#26
The Taliban, Mujahadeen, and others still exist because they are in the mountainous region of Afganistan. Heat seeking missiles dont mean shit over there.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,856
0
0
41
www.Tadou.com
#28
That was 1979 USSR technology (shortly before they collapsed...by the way), not 2004 U.S. technology....come the fuck on, you're living in a dream world.

And we would not need a single helicopter to utterly destroy Teheran, one of the only cities in Iran that means something. With Teheran destroyed (and i dont just mean, strategic bombing....i mean fucking DESTROYED), the Iranians themselves would throw their government out of power.
 
Aug 7, 2003
623
994
93
47
Pittsburg/Bay Point
#30
tadou said:
the Iranians themselves would throw their government out of power.

Which I think really needs to happen. The Mullah's kill people just for saying something about/against the government. Most of the population in Tehran screams for another revolution. 70% of the people in Iran are a young generation that wants freedom. I talk to a lot of people from Tehran and Isfahan that said it was much better when the Shah had the power. That is why (if you were to go) you would see huge populations in places like Los Angeles, Vancouver B.C., New York, Toronto, Germany and Dubai because nobody wants to go back until the government is changed. So, that’s why I think it should happen. And when it does, Iran would be a beautiful place to retire.


The Satanist!!!
 
Sep 28, 2002
1,124
4
0
#37
Israel (which is a bullshit country) wants war. It would be another land grab. It would be Iran, lebanon & Syria vs Israel and when it was over there would only be Israel and Iran with syria and lebanon divided between the two. Its funny to me how a country the size of vermont gets so much power for no reason. The entire arab/jew conflict has been cooked up for centuries to distract the people on both sides from the evils that their governing bodies enact on a daily basis. What do you think? If israel didn't have the arabs to point at would they get so much in aid, would their population accept the degradation of their neighbors? Would Iranians/Syrians/Saudis accept political bodies who's only role is the matinance of the status quo in which a small number of priviledged individuals and their families control millions with brutality and open air murder?

As far as Israel bombing Iran and Iran bombing Israel I think it won't happen unless its cleared by the whitehouse. Which won't happen until the us pulls out of Iraq which won't happen for a long ass time.

Who would win in a fight a well armed vermont or California?