Iran stops selling oil in U.S. dollars -report

[Formaldehyde Rx]

............

 

[2-0-Sixx]

do some of you make an actual effort to be this stupid? speaking of brainwashed some of you actually make me sick, because i know you are not the only ones this completely fucking dumb.

let me get this straight, the same agencies and intelligence community that told you there were WMD in iraq (you railed on bush saying he was full of shit and lying even though the democrats based their approval for the war on this information) comes and says Iran stopped trying to produce warheads and you all come out misinterpret it and you still take it as the gospel and use it to rail against the administration again. lmfao. here if any of you bipolar jackasses can even read, see what henry kissinger said about the report...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy.../12/12/AR2007121202331.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

What is it that you're trying to prove and getting all worked up about? The CIA says one thing, Bush says the opposite. To me, this only suggests one thing which is there is a split in the ruling elite and an internal struggle. What have you proved here??

Then, you source Henry Kissinger (which is LAUGHABLE) to back your statements up, which is the same as anyone else using the CIA as a source! Then you post an article by Thomas Friedman (which is void of any real information btw), who happens to be another neo-liberal, a writer for the NY times who has constantly defended the Iraq invasion and used his columns to defend the policies of Bush Co. You my man are a hypocrite.

 

[nhojsmith]

What is it that you're trying to prove and getting all worked up about? The CIA says one thing, Bush says the opposite. To me, this only suggests one thing which is there is a split in the ruling elite and an internal struggle. What have you proved here??

Then, you source Henry Kissinger (which is LAUGHABLE) to back your statements up, which is the same as anyone else using the CIA as a source! Then you post an article by Thomas Friedman (which is void of any real information btw), who happens to be another neo-liberal, a writer for the NY times who has constantly defended the Iraq invasion and used his columns to defend the policies of Bush Co. You my man are a hypocrite.

haha im not trying to prove anything, im pointing out the faults in some peoples reasoning when saying "ok, i accept what they say when they disagree with bush, see bush is a liar" "ok i reject what they say when they agree with bush, because bush is a liar".

thats it. its impossible to be a hypocrite in this context, im only feeding you more information, more conflicting information from your "sources". you pick and choose what you want to believe based on your constant bush scapegoating. listen to yourself, if something supports bush, you admit you reject it. in fact the only info you accept is that which is against him. dont pretend to be objective here champ.

 

[2-0-Sixx]

haha im not trying to prove anything, im pointing out the faults in some peoples reasoning when saying "ok, i accept what they say when they disagree with bush, see bush is a liar" "ok i reject what they say when they agree with bush, because bush is a liar".

Alright, no worries then comrade

t im only feeding you more information, more conflicting information from your "sources". you pick and choose what you want to believe based on your constant bush scapegoating. listen to yourself, if something supports bush, you admit you reject it. in fact the only info you accept is that which is against him. dont pretend to be objective here champ.

Using Tadou terminology, aye? When did I ever offer any of my personal opinions in this thread regarding Bush, etc.? I didn't. Maybe you have me confused with someone else. The only thing I did was post an article (Reuters), and then question your two articles (Kissinger & Friedman (two neo-liberal Jews)) and their motives, as well as your personal motives.

 

[nhojsmith]

Using Tadou terminology, aye? When did I ever offer any of my personal opinions in this thread regarding Bush, etc.? I didn't. Maybe you have me confused with someone else. The only thing I did was post an article (Reuters), and then question your two articles (Kissinger & Friedman (two neo-liberal Jews)) and their motives, as well as your personal motives.

youre right, it was the heat of the moment, telling me what your heart meant. lol. i projected the other peoples feelings and opinions on to you since you came to their aid. i should be better than this.

 

[I AM]

^^MAN, THERE I JUST TOO FEW PEOPLE GOVERNING TOO MANY PEOPLE NOWADAYS....SHIT, SWAER EVERY OTHER DAY ANOTHER DUDE TAHT WORKS FOR THE GOVT POPS UP ON ONE OF THESE TALK SHOWS, AND I GO WHO THE FUCK IS THIS DUDE AND WHAT AGENCY IS HE WORKING FOR....IT GETS DOWN TO WHERE YOU DONT KNOW WHO THE GOVT IS, AND WHO THE PEOPLE ARE WORKING IN GOVT ANYMORE....

big gov't is NOT a good thing.

so you saying you want more people governing the masses, is fucking stupid. or that there's not enough people governing governing the masses, either way, big gov't is a bad thing, imo. that's probably the ONLY conservative view point that i hold, besides the fact that i want the right to fucking bear arms.

the masses, just need to be fucking SMARTER about how they live, what they do, what they say, WHY they say and do the things they do, etc.

it's NOT about the gov't. it's about the people not taking the fucking innitiative to make their lives better and TAKING BACK WHAT IS RIGHTFULLY THEIRS IN THE FIRST PLACE (this country is ours, not the fucking gov'ts).