IMMINENT THREAT???????

Mac Allah · Jan 12, 2004

http://www.blackmustache.com/lies.html

^^click it^^

nefar559 · Jan 12, 2004

miggidy said:

not only that but the Bush administration accused Saddam of working with Al Qaeda, and invovled with 9/11. Accussing it of having WMD. And Saddam's regime alleged ability to strike the United States.

Isn't that an imminent threat????

Mcleanhatch · Jan 12, 2004

nefar559 said:

Ansar Al-Islam

nefar559 said:

can you show proof of that?????

Ethereal · Jan 12, 2004

Mac Allah said:

I really don't know why they (there was a different government then) didn't stop him in 1988 when the Kurds were gassed. Something should have been done, I couldn't agree more. I think Mcleanhatch made a pretty good point in saying that both countries (Iran - Iraq) were our enemies at the time; maybe that's why they didn't intervene, I don't know.

Mac Allah said:

I have a hard time understanding this "we" that some of you guys use redundantly. Are you refering to Reagon, Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., All of them, None of them, or maybe the people of America, I don't get how you can use "we" when the "we" that was responsible in a lot of these cases doesn't exist anymore, or is no longer a serious factor in making decisions.

Mac Allah said:

I hope we can continue to liberate countries in dire need. if however, we stop at Iraq, it is still better then nothing, although it looks pretty bad. Right now focus has been placed on North Korea (they need liberation as well) and there weapons programs. I would rather we worry about famine in North Korea, but if a ruler can watch his country soak in poverty then it would probably be best if we took away his nuclear weapons as well. Because of what has been in the works, North Korea has already agreed to freeze all of it's weapons programs for the time being. Sometimes progress IS a slow process.

2-0-Sixx · Jan 12, 2004

Nitro the Guru said:

The current Bush admin has people that were also in the Bush Sr. Admin, Reagon admin and I believe even the Clinton admin.

WHITE DEVIL · Jan 12, 2004

Bush's cabinet was around when the Constitution was drafted.

Ethereal · Jan 12, 2004

2-0-Sixx said:

I'm sure there are "people" still around.

2-0-Sixx · Jan 12, 2004

Nitro the Guru said:

I should have added, "a lot" of people.

nefar559 · Jan 12, 2004

Mcleanhatch said:

read the report i posted. You just have to read the qoutes. People just made the assumption, becuase that is what Dubya was implying.

nefar559 · Jan 12, 2004

Mcleanhatch said:

maybe but Powell at this moment doesn't beleive saddam had ties with Al queda.

2-0-Sixx · Jan 12, 2004

nefar559 said:

Here's a good link to back that statement up, just incase McNugget says "show me proof!" http://www.nytimes.com/auth/login?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/09/politics/09POWE.html

Mac Allah · Jan 13, 2004

Glad we agree

When i say WE it is because the people in power who are supposed to represent us the people, is who i am talking about. Now it could be REAGON, BUSH SR, CLINTON, BUSH JR. i really don't care cuz all of em are dicks and if i can't trust my past presidents why should i trust any other ones that come my way. thats why i'm glad i got both canadian and american citizenship so i can stay up in canada. and yall don't even know what a trip canada's government is. damn they got this dude jean cretchin i can't even spell his last name right anyways he the prime minister (canada doesn't have presidents) and this dude is a fuckin psyco. this guy Jean chrecthein was out in public and some crazy protester decides to run up on him... he pushes past the body gaurds and the pm put him in a chokehold... then there's this other time when someone broke into the PM's house so he smashed a statue on the guys head. Not only that and i know yall aint' goin be knowin this but jean cretchien said about the whole canadian weed dicriminilazation thing which didn't really end up happening that if it went down he'd smoke a joint with his fine in his hand ready to pay. that' shits hilarious. americans make me sick

sorry for the useless ramblin bout nothing but i'm high as a motheafucker and ain even carin

anyways heres some links yall should check out

Canadian prime minister a pot head:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/975443.asp?0cv=CB20&cp1=1

Few facts about canada's pot head primeminsiter

http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/chretien/funfacts.html

i'm tellin yall it's more fun in canada.

HERESY · Jan 13, 2004

IF IRAQ WAS NOT AN "IMMINENT" THREAT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HAS VIOLATED RULES AND REGULATIONS SET FOURTH BY NATO/U.N.

RIGHT NOW IM LAZY AND I'M LEAVING OUT THE HOUSE FOR A COUPLE OF HOURS. A THREAD EXISTS IN THIS FORUM IN WHICH I LISTED U.N. RESOLUTIONS MANDATES ETC ETC ETC. SOMEONE *PLEASE* FIND THAT THREAD AND LINK IT HERE OR SIMPLY REPLY TO IT AND BRING IT TO THE TOP.

MANDATE, IMMINENT THREAT, NATO AND ILLEGAL ARE WORDS THAT WERE CONSTANTLY USED IN THE THREAD. SOMEONE PLEASE BRING IT UP AND COMPARE THAT THREAD TO THIS MCLEANCUNT THREAD. PEEP HIS REPLIES IN THAT THREAD....

:HGK:

PS LOL@"LIBERATION"

Ethereal · Jan 13, 2004

HERESY said:

What he did to his own people combined with his already proven capacity to inflict harm on other countries (for something such as oil revenues) has proven that he is an imminent threat. I don't know that he was a threat to the U.S. specifically, but to other countries, I believe he was. Im not trying to clear America for any wrong doing, I'm speaking directly on the subject matter at hand, Saddam Hussein and Iraq.

Mac Allah · Jan 14, 2004

Mac Allah said:

This sounds like bush is implying sadam to be an imminent threat to me. And if it's true what bush said he probably is.

HERESY · Jan 14, 2004

Other countries? Thats up for debate. What I'm talking about is the united states of america attacking iraq because iraq was an "imminent threat". Since iraq was NOT an imminent threat why attack? An imminent threat would be a missile that is on its way and about to slam into america. Iraq didn't have the capabilities to launch such an attack. Honestly iraq attacking other countries is irrelevent. America is not the sanctioned world police so why attack iraq?

Find that thread i'm talking about and read it. I listed several things that america did which were basically "illegal" based on rules and regulations set fourth by un/nato.

:hgk:

Ethereal · Jan 14, 2004

I don't need to read the article to know the United States has committed a list of illegal actions against U.N. regulations. I will check it out if I have time, but this is not something I'm even arguing. I'm just glad Saddam Hussein is gone, and I don't care who it was that did the job.

nefar559 · Jan 14, 2004

acutally how can iraq be a threat to its neighbor? it doesnt have US backing as it did before, 10 years of sactions turned the country into a third world nation. Nobody in the region consider him a threat. We all saw the fight his army put up.

Mcleanhatch · Jan 14, 2004

THIS IS WHY I SAY THAT THOSE WHO SAY THAT BUSH SAID THAT IRAQ WAS AN IMMINENT THREAT ARE EITHER LYING OR MISQUOTING HIM.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html
^^^ STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS

Mcleanhatch said:

2-0-Sixx · Jan 14, 2004

2-0-Sixx said:

Well, McLeanFaggot, no one is going to find bush saying "Iraq is an imminent threat" because he never said that sentence...not exactly any ways. All you have to do, McNugget, is read the transcripts from his pre-war speach's, the speach at Cincinnati Museum Center is a good place to start. Bush's speach writers sure did a great job of twisting words around and at the same time making the public believe Iraq poses a threat to Amerika. "The threat comes from Iraq." Not quite "imminent threat" but still a threat. "confronting the threat posed by Iraq is crucial to winning the war on terror"

IMMINENT THREAT???????

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

THE HIDDEN HAND...

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

THE HIDDEN HAND...

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG

Sicc OG