Illuminati gets revenge on wikileaks?
- Thread starter M BUTCHER 206
- Start date
Nah I've seen the whole "reptilian" thing so I know what he's talking about. I saw ONE video of a guy on CNN or some shit where I was like... "WTF?"
I've looked into that a lot. Not because I believe it but because the videos (the one's that aren't completely off the wall) are kind of interesting. At least... they're done well. The only thing I have interest in, in that subject, is when a 2nd set of "eyelids" seem to "blink".
Back on topic though, the "molestation" charge is a completely different charge from the rape charges. To his credit, the Swedish laws refer to "molestation" as being inappropriate contact with another adult. I guess it would be like if you groped a bitch or cupped a dudes balls or some shit. I doubt that it had anything to do with the US government just trying to "get revenge". They dropped the rape charge but Sweden is still holding the molestation charge against him, though it seems to be pretty much a misdemeanor.
That shit isn't hard at all. Get the guy drunk/high while he's still alive, push his ass down some stairs, set up a suicide... something. I can't believe that the CIA is "getting lazy".
And why is it so suspicious for a dude who doesn't do much but run a conspiracy website to be a rapist? Public figures including BILL CLINTON have been accused or faced charges, and some times been convicted of sexual harassment and rape.
The guy is considered a nomad. He has no legal residence. If that's because of just this one website, he can stay somewhere to hide. IMO he comes off as a shady character.
I've looked into that a lot. Not because I believe it but because the videos (the one's that aren't completely off the wall) are kind of interesting. At least... they're done well. The only thing I have interest in, in that subject, is when a 2nd set of "eyelids" seem to "blink".
Back on topic though, the "molestation" charge is a completely different charge from the rape charges. To his credit, the Swedish laws refer to "molestation" as being inappropriate contact with another adult. I guess it would be like if you groped a bitch or cupped a dudes balls or some shit. I doubt that it had anything to do with the US government just trying to "get revenge". They dropped the rape charge but Sweden is still holding the molestation charge against him, though it seems to be pretty much a misdemeanor.
That shit isn't hard at all. Get the guy drunk/high while he's still alive, push his ass down some stairs, set up a suicide... something. I can't believe that the CIA is "getting lazy".
And why is it so suspicious for a dude who doesn't do much but run a conspiracy website to be a rapist? Public figures including BILL CLINTON have been accused or faced charges, and some times been convicted of sexual harassment and rape.
The guy is considered a nomad. He has no legal residence. If that's because of just this one website, he can stay somewhere to hide. IMO he comes off as a shady character.
Nah man, what I'm saying is that if the CIA wanted him to disappear it wouldn't be difficult to do so.
I doubt the CIA would conjure up a master plan to ask Sweden really politely to hold a guy on rape charges if it were as serious as everyone seems to make it out to be. And if it were, then why would they immediately drop the charges?
I doubt the CIA would conjure up a master plan to ask Sweden really politely to hold a guy on rape charges if it were as serious as everyone seems to make it out to be. And if it were, then why would they immediately drop the charges?
because simply it makes him looks bad. hell, take a look at what you said earlier. if he didnt have anything to hide why would he live so 'suspiciously', shit, he even looks like he could do it right? like he has something to hide? thats what you said, and if in fact this was bullshit meant to tarnish his name, well it worked on you, and think of all of the other people across the world it likely worked on. all it took was some accusations and then withdrawing them, the damage is done.
theres a reason why we have laws against this in the u.s., and you can sue for having your name defamed and tarnished with false info
theres a reason why we have laws against this in the u.s., and you can sue for having your name defamed and tarnished with false info
You're putting words in my mouth. I don't think that a person of such stature having "no known residence" is a normal thing. I never said anything about his appearance and I never said I thought he did shit.
The fact is, if the US government really wanted this guy to miraculously disappear then they wouldn't fake some dumb bullshit just so the internet could come up with conspiracy theory bullshit.
I don't know shit about the charges. For all I know, the guy paid some women to come up with bullshit to protect himself. If you ask me, he had a ton more to do with his own charges than the CIA. It's not like the US told the guy to go to Sweden just to trick him so that he couldn't file defamation charges. He's there by his own accord. Suspiciously so.
Now that he has the majority of the internet conspiracy theorists paying attention to the case, he feels like he can't be touched by the US government without people noticing. It's logical on his part, I suppose. But lets face it, this stupid "rape" case got more publicity than him "leaking" documents that nobody will bother to take the time to read. It's a fuckin' stunt.
The fact is, if the US government really wanted this guy to miraculously disappear then they wouldn't fake some dumb bullshit just so the internet could come up with conspiracy theory bullshit.
I don't know shit about the charges. For all I know, the guy paid some women to come up with bullshit to protect himself. If you ask me, he had a ton more to do with his own charges than the CIA. It's not like the US told the guy to go to Sweden just to trick him so that he couldn't file defamation charges. He's there by his own accord. Suspiciously so.
Now that he has the majority of the internet conspiracy theorists paying attention to the case, he feels like he can't be touched by the US government without people noticing. It's logical on his part, I suppose. But lets face it, this stupid "rape" case got more publicity than him "leaking" documents that nobody will bother to take the time to read. It's a fuckin' stunt.
this got more publicity than the leak, that the president addressed personally himself and was the hot topic for weeks?
lol i feel like a tool just for being in this discussion, whether it was this dude or whether it was some shadow organization or government organization that was responsible for it, bottom line is this is a distraction and we're all falling for it. i feel kind of ashamed to have brought it up, im just going to back out of this thread now, i dont want to argue about it
lol i feel like a tool just for being in this discussion, whether it was this dude or whether it was some shadow organization or government organization that was responsible for it, bottom line is this is a distraction and we're all falling for it. i feel kind of ashamed to have brought it up, im just going to back out of this thread now, i dont want to argue about it
