HUMAN BEINGS
- Thread starter I AM
- Start date
i never thought of that,thats,simply.....brilliant. I can already see people droppin like flies,rippin off the matress tickets only to have the bed fall on them and suffacate them,people drying there hair by shoving there heads in microwaves,lil kids tryin to swallow knives with penut butter on them,and fat people eating mcdonalds untill there knees snap
what are you talking about apes cant use there thumbs like us?give a couple examples,and nothing about how they cant write cause thats a mental thing.look at otters,they use there hands,they pick up a rock and smash open oyster shells,and yes they have thumbs.oh and apes have some what hands for feet,can you hold your self up on a branch by your feet?actually now that i think about it,apes could probably use there thumbs better then we can,since we need our thumbs to grab things,im pretty sure apes can race through a forrest grabin branches way faster then any human
Essentially, yes. And how is this strange? Every animal uses what it has to survive and defend itself, moving itself up on the chain. We use our brains to advance. With our brains comes technology. With technology comes advanced weapons, so on and so forth.
This is all circumstantial. Penguins can withstand much colder tempratures than humans, does this mean they are ahead of us in the chain? NO. They can simply withstand colder tempratures, thats all. Some animals have advantages over us, some do not. Whatever the case may be, and with whatever potential advantage they have over us, it is simply not enough.
Again this is circumstantial. What if this, and what if that. The world as it is today, with it's current conditions is what determines the "chain".
We are not in the middle of the food chain. We ARE living in nature and we are dominant over every animal in the world. A single animal treads onto a city street we quickly dispose of it. We on the other hand, roam their land to hunt them for fun.
I understand where you are coming from, really I do. However, you are trying to incorporate certain conditions where one animal would have a better chance at survival than we would, but as I have said before that is circumstantial. I could say a jelly fish without it's sting would be nothing more than a jelly fish, but what have I really said?
This is all circumstantial. Penguins can withstand much colder tempratures than humans, does this mean they are ahead of us in the chain? NO. They can simply withstand colder tempratures, thats all. Some animals have advantages over us, some do not. Whatever the case may be, and with whatever potential advantage they have over us, it is simply not enough.
Again this is circumstantial. What if this, and what if that. The world as it is today, with it's current conditions is what determines the "chain".
We are not in the middle of the food chain. We ARE living in nature and we are dominant over every animal in the world. A single animal treads onto a city street we quickly dispose of it. We on the other hand, roam their land to hunt them for fun.
I understand where you are coming from, really I do. However, you are trying to incorporate certain conditions where one animal would have a better chance at survival than we would, but as I have said before that is circumstantial. I could say a jelly fish without it's sting would be nothing more than a jelly fish, but what have I really said?
According to your logic can you answer me two questions:
1. What percent of the population (or land mass) did Hitler make up of Germany?
2. Did Hitler "run" Germany?
Point being that humans need only the position of control to run the planet, not a gun to each animals head.
You claim we do not run the world because of how small we are (percentage wise) to the rest of the world's species, but that is not the criteria. We can and will complicate the well being of any animal that roams this planet if we need to. We do not need to be at the side of every organism to determine their fate. We know where animals roam, which ones are endangered, those with threatening defenses etc. We have thoroughly studied all known animals down to their fucking DNA. And until the day comes where animals unite against humans, we will always be superior.
1. What percent of the population (or land mass) did Hitler make up of Germany?
2. Did Hitler "run" Germany?
Point being that humans need only the position of control to run the planet, not a gun to each animals head.
You claim we do not run the world because of how small we are (percentage wise) to the rest of the world's species, but that is not the criteria. We can and will complicate the well being of any animal that roams this planet if we need to. We do not need to be at the side of every organism to determine their fate. We know where animals roam, which ones are endangered, those with threatening defenses etc. We have thoroughly studied all known animals down to their fucking DNA. And until the day comes where animals unite against humans, we will always be superior.
DECEPTEKHAN,
YOU STRESSED, "what are you talking about apes cant use there thumbs like us?"
JUST LIKE YOU READ IT.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "give a couple examples,and nothing about how they cant write cause thats a mental thing."
I ALREADY HAVE. SCROLL BAK AND LEARN TO READ BETTER. NOW I SEE WHY YOU CONSIDER YOURSELF AN ANIMAL. AND WRITIN' IS JUST NOT MENTAL. APES THUMBS AIN'T THE SAME AS OUR THUMBS. THEY SHIT IS FURTHER APART AND ARE USED FOR BIgKER THANgS. THEY gRIP AIN'T THAT CLOSE.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "look at otters,they use there hands,they pick up a rock and smash open oyster shells,and yes they have thumbs."
BUT CAN THEY MAKE WEAPONS AND HOLD WEAPONS?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "oh and apes have some what hands for feet,can you hold your self up on a branch by your feet?"
WOULD THAT MAKE ME SUPERIOR? HOW IS IT AN ADVANTAgE?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "actually now that i think about it,apes could probably use there thumbs better then we can,since we need our thumbs to grab things,im pretty sure apes can race through a forrest grabin branches way faster then any human"
AND? YOU POINTIN' TO THE OBVIOUS. BUT AS I SAID, THEY gRIP IS NOT AS TIgHT AT ALL. ARES WERE CREATED TO HAVE THUMBS LIKE THAT FOR gRABBIN' BRANCHES. HAVE YOU SEEN HOW AN APE HOLDS A PENCIL? PEN?
YOU STRESSED, "what are you talking about apes cant use there thumbs like us?"
JUST LIKE YOU READ IT.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "give a couple examples,and nothing about how they cant write cause thats a mental thing."
I ALREADY HAVE. SCROLL BAK AND LEARN TO READ BETTER. NOW I SEE WHY YOU CONSIDER YOURSELF AN ANIMAL. AND WRITIN' IS JUST NOT MENTAL. APES THUMBS AIN'T THE SAME AS OUR THUMBS. THEY SHIT IS FURTHER APART AND ARE USED FOR BIgKER THANgS. THEY gRIP AIN'T THAT CLOSE.
THEN YOU STRESSED, "look at otters,they use there hands,they pick up a rock and smash open oyster shells,and yes they have thumbs."
BUT CAN THEY MAKE WEAPONS AND HOLD WEAPONS?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "oh and apes have some what hands for feet,can you hold your self up on a branch by your feet?"
WOULD THAT MAKE ME SUPERIOR? HOW IS IT AN ADVANTAgE?
THEN YOU STRESSED, "actually now that i think about it,apes could probably use there thumbs better then we can,since we need our thumbs to grab things,im pretty sure apes can race through a forrest grabin branches way faster then any human"
AND? YOU POINTIN' TO THE OBVIOUS. BUT AS I SAID, THEY gRIP IS NOT AS TIgHT AT ALL. ARES WERE CREATED TO HAVE THUMBS LIKE THAT FOR gRABBIN' BRANCHES. HAVE YOU SEEN HOW AN APE HOLDS A PENCIL? PEN?
Humans don't rule the world. There's like 1 million ants for every 1 human. We think we control shit because we kill anything that we deem more superior than ourselves, which is all subjective anyway.
Half of this thread is good, and the other half is people talking out of their ass...Humans have egos, all the other animals don't. We THINK we are superior. Key word is THINK. Humans THINK a lot. Doesn't make what they THINK anymore real.
Half of this thread is good, and the other half is people talking out of their ass...Humans have egos, all the other animals don't. We THINK we are superior. Key word is THINK. Humans THINK a lot. Doesn't make what they THINK anymore real.