Although he makes a really good point. Some of his "origins" can probably also be traced in other directions. Some of his reasoning was a bit biased to the point. Which is what making a point is supposed to do, but although I HAVENT RESEARCHED IT, it does seem like a bit of molding of ideas is going on. Im sure you could find some way shape or form that most or some of those origins were changed, and more appropriately fit to what we use now by europeans. But I cant really say shit since I wont take the time to do the research.